Jamal Crawford vs. Mike Dunleavy

NyKnicks1714 · Post #1 » by **NyKnicks1714** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:34 am

Dunleavy: 19.0ppg, 5.2 rbs, 3.5 ast, 47.6%fg, 42.4%3pt

Jamal: 20.5ppg, 5ast, 2.6rbs, 41.0%fg, 35.5%3pt

Pacers: 36 wins, Knicks: 23 wins

Post #2 » by **Alfred** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:38 am

All you need to do is look at the shooting percentages. MDJ is shooting very well this season, and they're both awful at defense, so you really have to give it to Mike.

a-rod · Post #3 » by **a-rod** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:45 am

Dunleavy, also hes not that bad on defense.....

Troubadour · Post #4 » by **Troubadour** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:26 pm

Jamal Crawfor di smore talented, but Dunleavy is the better player (Basketball IQ, shot selection).

Post #5 » by **Schad** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:02 pm

Crawford's stats are also inflated by the fact that he plays 40 mpg. On a per-minute basis, Dunleavy outscores him marginally, his additional rebounds outweigh Crawford's edge in assists, and the difference in shooting percentages are night and day.

Dunleavy, without hesitation.

conleyorbust · Post #6 » by **conleyorbust** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:13 pm

agentzerotoTO wrote:Jamal Crawfor di smore talented, but Dunleavy is the better player (Basketball IQ, shot selection).

I don't know that Crawford is more talented.

Anyway, Dunleavy without hesitation... and I dont' think Dunleavy is as good as his numbers.

BirdIsDaKing · Post #7 » by **BirdIsDaKing** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:44 pm

for some reason this thread made me literally sick to my stomach.

RapsVC15 · Post #8 » by **RapsVC15** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:53 pm

Crawford can only dream of shooting percentages like that.

kooldude · Post #9 » by **kooldude** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:00 am

haha @ the people that doubted Dunleavy when he said he'll bring it more this year. YEA MIKE!!

Post #10 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:40 pm

Crawfords numbers are inflated by his ability to be a superstar everytime he plays the Cavs. It's been going on for years and frankly I'm tired of it.