Boston vs. Atlanta - Series tied (2-2)
Moderators: cupcakesnake, infinite11285, Dirk, Harry Garris, ken6199, zimpy27, bwgood77, bisme37, KingDavid, Domejandro
- ubernathan
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,969
- And1: 548
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Under your bed!
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,804
- And1: 578
- Joined: Nov 08, 2004
- Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
ubernathan wrote:Boston in five, Atlanta will steal one game, Joe Johnson will have a huge series.
I hope so, but JJ has struggled this year vs. the Celtics..
BTW how much interest is there for this series?? Would people rather see this series rather than the other EC match ups? This just seems like an interesting series, even though Boston will probably destroy us.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,804
- And1: 578
- Joined: Nov 08, 2004
- Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
dcash4 wrote:boston sweep, double digit wins in all 4.
a 66 win team isn't going to drop a playoff game to a team 8 games under .500. this is going to be a massacre.
Don't let the record fool you, we are a horribly skitzo team that can play with the best on one night and lose to a sorry team the next. That comes with super young teams and a horrible coach. Don't get me wrong, I fully expect Boston to kills us, but we will at LEAST play a few close. I expect us to win one game though.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,785
- And1: 3,346
- Joined: Jan 24, 2003
- Location: Orlando, FL
- wigglestrue
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,124
- And1: 170
- Joined: Feb 06, 2003
- Location: Wiggling, after hitting a four-pointer of Truth
I really couldn't be happier to face the Hawks, not because I think they're an easy matchup, but because Josh Smith is one of the few players I truly enjoy watching, he's never ever boring. Hawks might almost win one of these games, maybe even almost win two. But I still think it's over in 4.
0:01.8 A. Walker makes 3-pt shot from 28 ft (assist by E. Williams) +3 109-108
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9qvmXiEuU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9qvmXiEuU
- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
- b-ball forever
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,737
- And1: 498
- Joined: Mar 17, 2006
- Location: So long Jason Kidd
JoshB914 wrote:The Hawks would be .500 or a bit above if they had Bibby all year. So they are a legit 8 seed. Not that it means that we won't get swept, but we are a 40-45 win team right now based on how we have been playing.
U suck at math, ATL 15-17 since the Bibby trade = under .500
And since u obviously aren't aware of it, Bibby was injured the first 3 months of the season, so that's tarded reasoning right there
- JoshB914
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,889
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Hawks lost their last 3 with Bibby- one was to the C's, the other two were after we had clinched the playoffs. We were a .500 team with him and maybe a bit better and anyone will tell you that. Nice try though.
I know Bibs was hurt, if we had him for 50 games (from day one) instead of 33 we are probably at .500.
I know Bibs was hurt, if we had him for 50 games (from day one) instead of 33 we are probably at .500.
- greenbeans
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,103
- And1: 14,116
- Joined: Sep 14, 2007
- b-ball forever
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,737
- And1: 498
- Joined: Mar 17, 2006
- Location: So long Jason Kidd
JoshB914 wrote:Hawks lost their last 3 with Bibby- one was to the C's, the other two were after we had clinched the playoffs. We were a .500 team with him and maybe a bit better and anyone will tell you that. Nice try though.
I know Bibs was hurt, if we had him for 50 games (from day one) instead of 33 we are probably at .500.
Oh wowzers, so 1 of the games the Hawks lost came against the Celts... what exactly is the excuse of a factor that was supposed to change the outcome of that game? U seriously think that u guys were gonna beat Orlando, the Celts, and the Heat for sure if the playoffs weren't wrapped up yet?
LMAO : "We were a .500 team with him and maybe a bit better and anyone will tell you that".
Wrong choice of words, "Anyone" does not equate to Hawks homers.
15-17 in the Bibby it the Bibby Era was,
15 divided by (15+17) = .468, NOT "above .500", 1 + 1 = 2, and 4 + 0 = sweep
So yes, u do suck at math, and that is tarded reasoning. Yer also an obvious homer
- greenbeans
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,103
- And1: 14,116
- Joined: Sep 14, 2007