Who will it be: Carlisle or Skiles?
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 107,033
- And1: 41,521
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,533
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 17, 2006
smauss wrote:It is somewhat ironic however Hammond had to take the word and/or get assurances from a historically meddling, control freak, politican owner; rather than a coach having to take Hammond at his word, which appears to be a much safer bet..........
Not sure I can agree with that. Hammonds ability to stick to his word is only as good as Kohls. Once Kohl reneges on his promises then Hammonds promises mean little.
Das ist nümberwang!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,710
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
I'm really hoping that Hammonds previous working relationship with Carlisle is able to seal the deal. He mentioned that he needs to work closely with the coach on personnel decisions. I don't see Skiles really liking much of what we have for a roster. Not that, that would cause him to not take the job.
I just hope that this Skiles talk is posturing by his agent to get him a quick deal in NY. Or this could be posturing from the Bucks side to motivate Carlisle to sign on with the Bucks.
Either way, I think the fan base would be almost unanimously ecstatic if we hit the home run and got Carlisle. If we land Skiles, Bucks Nation will be torn.
I just hope that this Skiles talk is posturing by his agent to get him a quick deal in NY. Or this could be posturing from the Bucks side to motivate Carlisle to sign on with the Bucks.
Either way, I think the fan base would be almost unanimously ecstatic if we hit the home run and got Carlisle. If we land Skiles, Bucks Nation will be torn.
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
- Cold Crush 24
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,978
- And1: 151
- Joined: Nov 25, 2007
- Location: Major Goolsby's
- Contact: