Weltman officially aboard
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,710
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
- steger_3434
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,419
- And1: 5,649
- Joined: Mar 05, 2005
- Location: Getting Rowdy in Section 212 with Squad 6
-
wichmae wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Who said Hammond's first choice is Carlisle?
If it does happen to be that Skiles is his first choice, our new GM has put a sour taste in my mouth right from the start.
yiyiyi wrote:give rockets Redd ,houston give you T-MAC in return .please help rockets!
i dont want see that woman anymore !
- wichmae
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,762
- And1: 1,060
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
steger_3434 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
If it does happen to be that Skiles is his first choice, our new GM has put a sour taste in my mouth right from the start.
I really have no idea what everyone has against Scott Skiles...
That mess in Chicago had nothing to do with him.
The most overrated GM in the NBA made that mess....
- bango_the_buck
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,429
- And1: 173
- Joined: May 11, 2006
wichmae wrote:I really have no idea what everyone has against Scott Skiles...
That mess in Chicago had nothing to do with him.
The most overrated GM in the NBA made that mess....
It seems everyone gets on Skiles because they think the players eventually get feed up with his demanding style. But in that respect, he is very much like Jerry Sloan, one of the most successful coaches in NBA history. The only difference is Sloan has had (for the most part) the full support of his organization and they only bring players in that fit his system. I for one, wouldn't mind seeing the same sort of continuity with the Bucks. Carlisle himself isn't the easiest person to get along with and if he's not Hammond's first choice, I think there will probably be good reason for it...
Scott Skiles on being compared by reporters to Hall of Fame coach Pat Riley: "If I thought you guys knew anything, I'd be flattered."
- wichmae
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,762
- And1: 1,060
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
All the candidates that are being looked at have the same persona - tough, demanding, defensive minded - and none of them come with no baggage..
There is no perfect available coach.
All the guys that are being looked at have worn out there welcome once and some more once.
That being said the same arguments that some make against one candidate others can say the same against another one. JH is a brilliant basketball mind and will make the proper choice no matter what. Look at it in the same way some others are. The guy knows winning and how to win. His decision whatever it may be is probably in our best interest as a franchise. Thats why he was hired and why Jeff was brought with.
We finally get someone in here that isnt afraid of making moves and going after his guys no matter what and people still find a way to complain.
There is no perfect available coach.
All the guys that are being looked at have worn out there welcome once and some more once.
That being said the same arguments that some make against one candidate others can say the same against another one. JH is a brilliant basketball mind and will make the proper choice no matter what. Look at it in the same way some others are. The guy knows winning and how to win. His decision whatever it may be is probably in our best interest as a franchise. Thats why he was hired and why Jeff was brought with.
We finally get someone in here that isnt afraid of making moves and going after his guys no matter what and people still find a way to complain.
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
wichmae wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I really have no idea what everyone has against Scott Skiles...
I don't get it either. It's very possible he may be a head coach who has a short shelf life wherever he goes - just like Karl has had in his career. But even if that's the case I still would be happy to get him. Why? Simple. There are three things Scott Skiles' teams tend to do:
1. They play hard.
2. They defend.
3. They win.
How often have we been able to say any of those things about the Bucks in the past two decades?
I'd prefer Carlisle over Skiles but if those are the two choices I view it as a win-win for the Bucks.
Nothing will not break me.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,042
- And1: 8,369
- Joined: Apr 22, 2002
-