Bgil wrote:I simply pointed out that your original assertion is/was incorrect, but apparently it was too complex for you to understand. The Nuggets do NOT need Iverson to drop 48 in 3 quarters to stay in the game based on the FACT that they've also stayed in the game in both of the other ones (one without Melo) up to the 4th quarter and some change without Iverson dropping that many.
Learn to read. I didn't say you need Iverson to drop 48 (as in every game all the time). I said you "needed it". As in that game. You probably would have been blown out (for a third time) had he not had an outburst
Getting blown out in two games and putting up your absolute best to hang in another one is not a good thing.
the regular season is not a good indicator of results in the playoffs.
two of the laker wins during the season were in november--melo was in a slump at that time and kenyon was a non-factor.
the other laker win was with melo injured for three quarters.
bynum is more important to the lakers than gasol because of what he contributes on the defensive end. he was averaging a solid 2.1 blocks per game prior to injury and was altering plenty of shots. while gasol contributes a lot offensively (not that bynum wasn't averaging 12 ppg on 64% FG)...the lakers are going to hurt without bynum on the floor.
if the nuggets can see any sort of results from nene...we will dominate the interior of this series on both ends of the court.