Should the playoffs re-seed after each round?

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Should the playoffs re-seed after each round?

Yes re-seed after each round
7
30%
No don't re-seed everything is fine the way it is
16
70%
 
Total votes: 23

T-Mac for MVP
Analyst
Posts: 3,184
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2003

Should the playoffs re-seed after each round? 

Post#1 » by T-Mac for MVP » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:02 am

If anyone is familiar with the NHL they know the playoffs get re-seeded after each round. That is, the team with the most points from the regular season in the playoff round will play the team with the least amount of points in that round. This is NHL's way to avoid the top 2 teams playing each other after round 1 since the division leaders get the top3 seeds like it was with the NBA a couple years back. Then NBA changed it so that division leaders are gauranteed a top4 seed, not top 3. Of course the NBA doesn't use points like the NHL, so it would just be win/loss record rather than points.

The one drawback (or perhaps the way it should be) is that a lower seed will have to continually play the top teams. If you are the 8th seed for example and you beat the 1 seed in round 1, your reward would be you get to play the 2nd seed in round 2 (assuming 2 beats 7) instead of playing the winner of the 4/5 matchup as it is now.

Some of you are probably thinking, "what happens if the 1,2,3, and 4 teams all win"? Well if that happens 1 will play 4 and 2 plays 3 in the 2nd round anyways regardless of which system we use.
User avatar
Texas Longhorns
Banned User
Posts: 4,005
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 08, 2008
Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
Contact:

 

Post#2 » by Texas Longhorns » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:04 am

No, it's fine the way it is.
Image
- Vince Young - Kevin Durant - LaMarcus Aldrige - T.J. Ford - D.J. Augustin
Icefire10304
Veteran
Posts: 2,940
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 19, 2005

 

Post#3 » by Icefire10304 » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:34 am

Its fine the way it is...the top teams usually advance to the later rounds anyway
User avatar
dacher
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,729
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 20, 2003

 

Post#4 » by dacher » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:36 am

Nah. Basketball upsets are comparatively rare. If you got extremely lucky/played awesome/ enough to upset a much higher seeded team, you deserve a break.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

 

Post#5 » by _SRV_ » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:42 am

Nope, big upsets should be rewarded.
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Kobe gets bailed out more than Wall Street.
arrpy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,220
And1: 5
Joined: May 05, 2007
Location: N.L

 

Post#6 » by arrpy » Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:52 am

It's more exciting the way it is now.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

 

Post#7 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:35 am

_SRV_ wrote:Nope, big upsets should be rewarded.


Exactly, if you reseed after every round you penalize teams for having the big upset. That's just ridiculus.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
T-Mac for MVP
Analyst
Posts: 3,184
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2003

 

Post#8 » by T-Mac for MVP » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:54 am

We would be penalizing the team for having a bad regular season record.
User avatar
CITYOFANGELSX3
RealGM
Posts: 13,011
And1: 151
Joined: May 31, 2007
Location: Southside, Ca
       

 

Post#9 » by CITYOFANGELSX3 » Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:20 am

No, its fine the way it is.
Image
User avatar
Teen Girl Squad
Head Coach
Posts: 7,044
And1: 3,191
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Location: Southern California
       

 

Post#10 » by Teen Girl Squad » Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:32 am

Also works in reverse. With the upset, you are just giving the higher seed an easier path to through the playoffs, which except for maybe this year out west, usually isnt necessary. I mean if say philly upsets detroit, do we really need to let the Cs avoid Lebron in round two?
Image
CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,572
And1: 4,202
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

 

Post#11 » by CBS7 » Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:34 am

NFL does that too, I believe.

But it is fine the way it is.
User avatar
Teen Girl Squad
Head Coach
Posts: 7,044
And1: 3,191
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Location: Southern California
       

 

Post#12 » by Teen Girl Squad » Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:38 am

CBS7 wrote:NFL does that too, I believe.

But it is fine the way it is.


The NFL is different in that the 2 best teams in each conference get a bye week. They reseed to reward the 1 seed over the 2 seed.
triplet1984
General Manager
Posts: 8,356
And1: 177
Joined: Jan 18, 2006

 

Post#13 » by triplet1984 » Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:49 am

i swear the only reason reseeding came up is because of Dal/GS. if Dallas had won nobody would have been whining about SA/Phoenix being in the semis because the best (regular season) team would still be in it and probably in the Conf Finals.
asdfgh
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,623
And1: 755
Joined: Jan 23, 2003
   

 

Post#14 » by asdfgh » Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:35 am

No, I prefer things the way they are now.
Ern III
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,274
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 12, 2007
Contact:

 

Post#15 » by Ern III » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:33 am

Don't mess with the NBA Playoffs.

Re-seeding, best sixteen records, mixing conferences... it's all baloney, pushed by a self-concerned media.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,148
And1: 9,858
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#16 » by Blame Rasho » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:38 am

Ern III wrote:Don't mess with the NBA Playoffs.

Re-seeding, best sixteen records, mixing conferences... it's all baloney, pushed by a self-concerned media.


I have to agree with you... leave it as it is...

I in fact liked it when it was 4 divisions...

Pacific
Midwest
Central
Atlantic.

Return to The General Board