So much for the Jazz not being able to win on the road.

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

User avatar
RaoulDuke79
RealGM
Posts: 11,947
And1: 5,220
Joined: Jul 31, 2006
Location: purchasing stunning amounts of pudding.

 

Post#61 » by RaoulDuke79 » Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:32 pm

erudite23 wrote:I actually, literally, loled at that. Their interior defense has been significantly better WITHOUT him than with him, actually. In fact, after we beat Houston last year, I seem to remember everyone discounting that victory by saying that Yao was a huge liability defensively because he couldn't keep up with Boozer. Before these playoffs started, the reasoning was that now Booze wouldn't be able to run circles around Yao, and Deke would give him trouble, so it was going to be a whole different story.
The double talk is blowing my mind.

Bottom line, say what you want, the Jazz have the best road record in the league right now.


I never said that personally. I felt they would struggle without Yao(regardless of Boozer being a mismatch for him defensively) simply because they would lack a post player that can actually demand a double team as well as score(therefore taking pressure of T-Mac and providing more open shot opportunities for the rest of the scrubs).

And stats might "prove" me wrong on the Rockets interior defense being better without Yao(do they? I'm curious about that) but from what I've seen it's the opposite. Dikembe is not a better defender than Yao, he's a better shotblocker and a slightly better rebounder perhaps, but not a better defender(unless we're talking specifically about guarding Boozer in which case that could be true).

I seem to recall seeing many-a-game of us giving up easy layup after layup after Yao went down, but then again I do live in Imagination Land.

:lol:
We watched the tragedy unfold. We did as we were told, we bought and sold. It was the greatest show on Earth...but then it was over.
Cal_Hoops
Sophomore
Posts: 157
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Location: Cali

 

Post#62 » by Cal_Hoops » Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:47 pm

[quote="erudite23"][/quote]

Well said, and I agree with you on all points! Sometimes, it's just a matter of matching up. The Jazz have pretty much held their own against pretty much all teams, and so far have just seem to have problems with the Lakers. Even though SA may arguably be a better team than LA, I would rather face SA than LA (if I were Utah). However, don't think that LA is going to take you guys lightly. (They better not, or they'll be in for a big surprise.) Utah is really the dark horse in the Western conference. Everyone says LA and SA are the favorites, but I think that Utah is right up there as well. They are so versatile, have so many weapons, have a deep rotation, etc. The fact that your team is so young is just another plus. There is plenty of time for the Jazz to be contenders in the packed West.

(Being a Warriors fan first, I can't believe I even said that. You guys have pretty much owned us.) :banghead:

Return to The General Board