ImageImageImage

Game 4: Mavs Vs. Hornets

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

User avatar
fokker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 14, 2003

 

Post#121 » by fokker » Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:08 am

Its too bad whats happening to the mavs... wait no its not, fokk the Mavs. You can't buy championships the way Cubes has attempted. Trading away Nash so they could sign a "premier" big man like DAMPIER doesn't help the cause. Its a testament to the Lakers of how succesful they have been over the years and how consistently they win year in and year out. Its time to blow this team up. Starting with Dirk.

:wave:
The Laker nation will rise again...

sosafan70 wrote:The Mavs have balls. I like balls.
arkuo
General Manager
Posts: 9,795
And1: 2,291
Joined: Jun 16, 2004

 

Post#122 » by arkuo » Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:22 am

fokker wrote:Its a testament to the Lakers of how succesful they have been over the years and how consistently they win year in and year out. Its time to blow this team up. Starting with Dirk.

:wave:


so dirk has to cry out for a trade request everytime his team loses like kobe does? or does raping a colorado girl help the cause?

oh and fokker, fokk you! :rofl:
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#123 » by JES12 » Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:45 am

fokker wrote:Trading away Nash so they could sign a "premier" big man like DAMPIER doesn't help the cause. Its a testament to the Lakers of how succesful they have been over the years and how consistently they win year in and year out. Its time to blow this team up.

1) We did not trade Nash. If you want to be condescending, at least know what you are talking about.

2a) Mavs and Lakers have nothing to do with each other. Cuban does not blackmail the Grizzlies GM with revealing pictures in order to pull off a lopsided steal the way the Lakers did.

2b) Cuban is not known for having not 1, but 2 superstars demanding to get the hell out of Dallas the way Shaq and Kobe has done in less than a 3 year span.

2c) Year in and year out? Since Cuban bought the Mavericks:
Dallas 51, 67, 60, 58, 52, 60, 57, 53,
LA 57, 42 (sub-50 year), 45 (sub-50 year), 34 (lotto and sub-50 year), 56, 50, 58, 56,

Looks like dallas is the more concistant one. Once again, you don't have your facts right.

Return to Dallas Mavericks