ImageImageImage

More talent, 95 Celtics with 35 wins or 08 Hawks with 37

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Celtics_History_Lesson
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,983
And1: 6,269
Joined: Jul 10, 2003

More talent, 95 Celtics with 35 wins or 08 Hawks with 37 

Post#1 » by Celtics_History_Lesson » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:51 am

Maybe the Hawks are better than their record indicates. Compare them to the Celtics who just got into the playoffs a while ago with 35 wins for the season. Dino was a superstar, X-Man was good, Dominique shot the ball a lot, Montross was big but wasn't passed the ball, Wesley and Brown were a very short backcourt and Sherman Douglas was also there.

The Hawks do have a lot of lottery picks. A lot more talent than many 37 win teams. Bibby, Williams and Horford know how to win, at least at the college level. Pachulia is a strong player that is useful for playoff basketball. Is Claxton on their roster, he brings some knowledge like Cassell should for Boston.

Comparing the Hawks of now to the Celtics of then, the Hawks would sweep them like the Magic did in 1995. The Hawks of 2008 may have underachieved during the regular season, so while the standings say 37 wins they are really a lot better than that, and if a coach that is poor in their knowledge underestimates the Hawks it could be very bad.
User avatar
betta1
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,547
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Varies

 

Post#2 » by betta1 » Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:04 am

Agreed 100%
anorexorcism
Banned User
Posts: 7,286
And1: 10
Joined: Oct 19, 2007
Location: Enjoying life.

 

Post#3 » by anorexorcism » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:11 am

The problem with these first round upsetters (still potential in this case, but looking more and more likely) is that once they get to the next round, they almost never advance. They're "happy to be there."

The only exception, ever, was the Knicks of '99. And that was a weird season anyway with the lockout and all.
User avatar
Adobozz
Junior
Posts: 491
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 05, 2006
Location: ATL

 

Post#4 » by Adobozz » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:22 am

Yes we underachieved, but we also got Bibby at the trade deadline.
Potato Head!
User avatar
Ed Pinkney
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,067
And1: 5,215
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Australia
 

 

Post#5 » by Ed Pinkney » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:26 am

I agree on the talent comparison.

But for anyone who might care, in '95 the Magic won 3-1 and Boston gave them a serious scare, it was a pretty close series. From memory Orlando won Game 1 by like 40 points or something, then Boston won game 2 in Orlando. Games 3 and 4 both came down to the last possessions of the game with Boston easily could have won them both. Plus I think Wesley, Fox and Montross all injured. I remember Derek Strong having to guard Shaq in game 4.
User avatar
MagicMadness
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,808
And1: 3,394
Joined: Jan 24, 2003
Location: Orlando, FL

 

Post#6 » by MagicMadness » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:47 am

I remember when the Celtics won the second game. I will never forget the next day's Orlando Sentinel newspaper front page headline:

TRAGIC KINGDOM

Local media ripped the Magic for that loss.

Return to Boston Celtics