Do you loose some respect for Spurs 4 using Hack a Shaq.
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Do you loose some respect for Spurs 4 using Hack a Shaq.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,424
- And1: 2,487
- Joined: Sep 01, 2003
Do you loose some respect for Spurs 4 using Hack a Shaq.
Phil Jackson brought this up and after thinking I have to agree. I think using the hack a Shaq makes me think less of Greg Popovich and the Spurs. The idea that a world championship team used the hack a Shaq to advance to the second round makes me really wonder how confident they were in there ability to win that series without. I don't think they win game 1 or game 5 without using it.
- DelaneyRudd
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 104,541
- And1: 9,469
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
-
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,874
- And1: 13
- Joined: Jun 03, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
-
- lukeridenour
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,263
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 19, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
some lose respect, others praise for attacking such an obvious weakness.
the ultimate goal is to win right?
the ultimate goal is to win right?
Manu Ginobili:
* Italian League Championship: 2001
* Italian Cup: 2001, 2002
* Euroleague: 2001
* Americas Championship: 2001
* NBA Championship: 2003, 2005, 2007
* Summer Olympic Games gold medal: 2004
* Italian League Championship: 2001
* Italian Cup: 2001, 2002
* Euroleague: 2001
* Americas Championship: 2001
* NBA Championship: 2003, 2005, 2007
* Summer Olympic Games gold medal: 2004
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,617
- And1: 198
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
- Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !
I just dont like the idea of fouling him off the ball. If he is about to dunk it right next to the basket, then foul him. Or if he has the ball in his hands, and you want to use it, the foul him. But to foul him off the ball numerous times is not good imo.
Before anyone criticizes phil about using hack a shaq in chicago against orlando, he said he didnt do it when he was off the ball, only when he was at the basket ready to dunk.
But it helped the spurs win, and thats all that matters.
Before anyone criticizes phil about using hack a shaq in chicago against orlando, he said he didnt do it when he was off the ball, only when he was at the basket ready to dunk.
But it helped the spurs win, and thats all that matters.
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:
"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,495
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jan 02, 2005
- Contact:
baroidi wrote:I love hack a shaq, it's hillarious when shaq misses FTs. I liked that Eddie Jordan used the Hack a Ben Wallace on a few occasions. Guys who are so poor at a fundamental skillset such as shooting FTs, should be punished and embarrassed.
agreed plus a win is a win no matter what and a lose is a lose no matter what
- Heat3
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,398
- And1: 16,173
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: Where all the children are above average.
- Contact:
-
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,562
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
-
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,124
- And1: 380
- Joined: Nov 04, 2003
Phil's just a hater.. He did the samething in Chicago vs. Orlando.. Just because Shaq had the ball doesn't make a difference. If you're on the court regardless of where you are on the court a foul is a foul. It's not like Shaq was sitting on the bench and the Spurs fouled him and compelled him to shoot FTs.
- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,424
- And1: 2,487
- Joined: Sep 01, 2003
Its not a brilliant tactic. Its really stupid. Off the ball fouls to gain an advantage ruins the spirit of basketball. If it works why not do it the entire game. Use all the fouls at the end of your bench. Use some of the fouls of your starters. You may be able to ruin 30 possessions. You could have an entire quarter of just hack a shaq.
IMO if your the best then go out and show your the best. Its embarrassing to be put in the game just to foul Shaq. The players don't want to do hack a Shaq. You just make them look like there not needed.
Its within the rules and you can't kill them 4 it. That said steroids wasn't against the rules in baseball either didn't mean it was right to take them.
IMO if your the best then go out and show your the best. Its embarrassing to be put in the game just to foul Shaq. The players don't want to do hack a Shaq. You just make them look like there not needed.
Its within the rules and you can't kill them 4 it. That said steroids wasn't against the rules in baseball either didn't mean it was right to take them.
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful." John Wooden
- TMACFORMVP
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,947
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jun 30, 2006
- Location: 9th Seed
It's part of the game, like mentioned they're taking advantage of an opponents weakness, it's just smart.
They didn't lose the series because of this either (they could have just taken Shaq out as well), it was because of the inability to stop dribble penetration and execution in the late stages of a game.
They didn't lose the series because of this either (they could have just taken Shaq out as well), it was because of the inability to stop dribble penetration and execution in the late stages of a game.
Re: Do you loose some respect for Spurs 4 using Hack a Shaq.
-
- On Leave
- Posts: 42,148
- And1: 9,859
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Re: Do you loose some respect for Spurs 4 using Hack a Shaq.
richboy wrote:Phil Jackson brought this up and after thinking I have to agree. I think using the hack a Shaq makes me think less of Greg Popovich and the Spurs. The idea that a world championship team used the hack a Shaq to advance to the second round makes me really wonder how confident they were in there ability to win that series without. I don't think they win game 1 or game 5 without using it.
LOL... Jackson would hack a Bowen in 2003. Hypocrite.