Steve Kerr says "Shaq trade was a success"

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

carlos1223
Banned User
Posts: 847
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 23, 2008

Steve Kerr says "Shaq trade was a success" 

Post#1 » by carlos1223 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:06 pm

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/115252

Do you agree that the trade was worth it? Or is Steve just trying to be positive right now?
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#2 » by JoshB914 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:06 pm

lol. If it doesn't win a title it's a failure. So it's a failure thus far. The window of opportunity is closing for the Suns. And they may have in fact closed the door on themselves by not getting KG last summer when they had the chance.
carlos1223
Banned User
Posts: 847
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 23, 2008

 

Post#3 » by carlos1223 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:08 pm

JoshB914 wrote:lol. If it doesn't win a title it's a failure. So it's a failure thus far. The window of opportunity is closing for the Suns. And they may have in fact closed the door on themselves by not getting KG last summer when they had the chance.


Holy crap. They had a chance to get KG and they didn't take it? That's utter stupidity.
theTHIEF
RealGM
Posts: 12,940
And1: 214
Joined: Aug 08, 2003
 

 

Post#4 » by theTHIEF » Thu May 1, 2008 8:10 pm

Steve Kerr - Click Here

honestly though, they needed to move Marion, and this trade helped Amare a lot...was it the best deal that they could have gotten? maybe not, but I dont think it's as bad as some people make it out to be...
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

 

Post#5 » by 5DOM » Thu May 1, 2008 8:11 pm

maybe the suns improved their team with this trade.

but it wasnt a success.
Image
User avatar
Rox_Nix_Nox
Veteran
Posts: 2,887
And1: 26
Joined: Dec 05, 2007
Location: Southernfornia

 

Post#6 » by Rox_Nix_Nox » Thu May 1, 2008 8:11 pm

In their eyes it was a success.

This is coming from an organization that has yet to win a championship.
carlos1223
Banned User
Posts: 847
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 23, 2008

 

Post#7 » by carlos1223 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:11 pm

[quote="theTHIEF"]Steve Kerr - Click Here

honestly though, they needed to move Marion, and this trade helped Amare a lot...was it the best deal that they could have gotten? maybe not, but I dont think it's as bad as some people make it out to be...[/quote]


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

 

Post#8 » by enigmatics » Thu May 1, 2008 8:16 pm

carlos1223 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Holy crap. They had a chance to get KG and they didn't take it? That's utter stupidity.


Minny wanted Amare. All you're doing is swapping out players who are relatively the same. Notice the improvement comes when you get a player to complement the mix (like Gasol to the Lakers), not subtract from it or be a lateral move.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,113
And1: 4,499
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

 

Post#9 » by LAKESHOW » Thu May 1, 2008 8:18 pm

your standards must be set high if you get a guy like shaq. when we picked him up, there was only one goal in mind. TAKE DOWN THE CHAMPIONSHIP!

in that sense, phoenix failed in that endeavor. if that is NOT your goal, then you need to get fired!

so no, the shaq trade was not a success. why? shaq is not going to get better next year.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
User avatar
Deuce33
Pro Prospect
Posts: 897
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 01, 2006

 

Post#10 » by Deuce33 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:18 pm

Rox_Nix_Nox wrote:In their eyes it was a success.

This is coming from an organization that has yet to win a championship.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=5vGzth8cCag
Image
User avatar
shawngoat23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 287
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

 

Post#11 » by shawngoat23 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:22 pm

This guy is in denial. It wasn't just not a success, it was the worst failure I've ever seen. They got rid of Kurt Thomas (and two picks) just to clear out some cap space, and they go on and take on his monstrous contract? When Kurt Thomas could have given them toughness inside and rebounding without being completely inept from the line. At the cost of Marion, and $20 million more next year (plus another $20 M in luxury tax).
penbeast0 wrote:Yes, he did. And as a mod, I can't even put him on ignore . . . sigh.
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#12 » by JoshB914 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:34 pm

There was a Draft Day deal in place between ATL, Phoenix, and Minnesota.

ATL was sending the 3rd and 11th picks and expriings to minny. Minny was sending KG to Phoenix, and Phoenix was sending Amare to Atlanta. The Suns refused to deal Amare.

And then they ended up in the EXACT SAME situation as they could not defend Tim Duncan or play any semblance of low post D. The result of that was the desperation trade for Shaq.

KG changed the culture in Boston. There is no doubt in my mind he would have done the same thing for Phoenix. Not to mention he can run the floor and shoot the j (unlike Shaq) and Phoenix wouldn't have had to change much offensively.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,113
And1: 4,499
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

 

Post#13 » by LAKESHOW » Thu May 1, 2008 8:35 pm

that was actually cool seeing thomas come back and take his old team down.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,113
And1: 4,499
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

 

Post#14 » by LAKESHOW » Thu May 1, 2008 8:37 pm

and oh yeah, it was great seeing them eliminate themselves from the western conference scheme of things. they were a pain in the ass with all their trash talkin.

secondly, the blazers and hornets look to be really tough teams to battle with us for years to come.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

 

Post#15 » by enigmatics » Thu May 1, 2008 8:39 pm

JoshB914 wrote:There was a Draft Day deal in place between ATL, Phoenix, and Minnesota.

ATL was sending the 3rd and 11th picks and expriings to minny. Minny was sending KG to Phoenix, and Phoenix was sending Amare to Atlanta. The Suns refused to deal Amare.

And then they ended up in the EXACT SAME situation as they could not defend Tim Duncan or play any semblance of low post D. The result of that was the desperation trade for Shaq.

KG changed the culture in Boston. There is no doubt in my mind he would have done the same thing for Phoenix. Not to mention he can run the floor and shoot the j (unlike Shaq) and Phoenix wouldn't have had to change much offensively.


You forgot the part where KG turned water into wine and curing cancer.

Look, nobody doubts KG brought a little more passion to the Celtics, but let's not underestimate how the rest of the cards fell for Boston. They aquired Ray Allen and brought on Tim Thibedeaux to work on the defense all the while Rajon Rondo made massive strides.

KG coming to Phoenix wouldn't change the fact that the team has severe defensive limitations and doesn't practice them enough to overcome them, especially with in-game recognition.
User avatar
Milan24
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,300
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 02, 2006
Location: Earth

 

Post#16 » by Milan24 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:40 pm

enigmatics wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Minny wanted Amare. All you're doing is swapping out players who are relatively the same. Notice the improvement comes when you get a player to complement the mix (like Gasol to the Lakers), not subtract from it or be a lateral move.

Are you saying that Amare and KG are the same? It would of been a lateral move? :rofl:

KG is the defensive player of the year, Amare wouldn't even be considered for a 5th team defense if the NBA had one.

On top of that, KG is a LEADER, something Amare will never be.
User avatar
Milan24
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,300
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 02, 2006
Location: Earth

 

Post#17 » by Milan24 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:44 pm

enigmatics wrote:-= original quote snipped =-





KG coming to Phoenix wouldn't change the fact that the team has severe defensive limitations and doesn't practice them enough to overcome them, especially with in-game recognition.


And the Celtics had those same limitations until KG came in and preached work on the defensive end.
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

 

Post#18 » by enigmatics » Thu May 1, 2008 8:49 pm

Milan24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Are you saying that Amare and KG are the same? It would of been a lateral move? :rofl:

KG is the defensive player of the year, Amare wouldn't even be considered for a 5th team defense if the NBA had one.

On top of that, KG is a LEADER, something Amare will never be.


KG's the better defensive player, but not nearly the dynamic game changing scorer Amare is. Albeit, Amare's leadership skills are quite lacking.
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#19 » by JoshB914 » Thu May 1, 2008 8:49 pm

enigmatics wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



You forgot the part where KG turned water into wine and curing cancer.

Look, nobody doubts KG brought a little more passion to the Celtics, but let's not underestimate how the rest of the cards fell for Boston. They aquired Ray Allen and brought on Tim Thibedeaux to work on the defense all the while Rajon Rondo made massive strides.

KG coming to Phoenix wouldn't change the fact that the team has severe defensive limitations and doesn't practice them enough to overcome them, especially with in-game recognition.


I did forget to add the water to wine part. But ESPN talks about that enough already.

I disagree with you on this one. If you replace KG with Amare on your team I think it's a different story this year. You've got a guy that demands defensive hustle out of everyone and can run the floor and shoot the J (so no offensive overhaul like with Shaq). I think that in the Dantoni offense, KG could have become a better version of Amare.
User avatar
enigmatics
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,459
And1: 3,568
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
     

 

Post#20 » by enigmatics » Thu May 1, 2008 8:52 pm

Milan24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



And the Celtics had those same limitations until KG came in and preached work on the defensive end.


Preached? Fine. He preached a little bit..........but the fundementals were taught to them by Thibideaux and I don't know how you can even begin to deny that. Let's not over-exaggerate KG's impact. There's a reason why that franchise is going to be hoisting a "NBA's Top Executive" award this year. Every move they made panned out.

Return to The General Board