PER Leaders Playoffs (1st Round)

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,349
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

PER Leaders Playoffs (1st Round) 

Post#1 » by JordansBulls » Sat May 3, 2008 1:20 pm

PER Leaders Playoffs

1 Chris Paul, NOR 5 31.96
2 LeBron James, CLE 6 29.40
3 Kobe Bryant, LAL 4 27.93
4 Dwight Howard, ORL 5 27.93
5 Tony Parker, SAS 5 26.59
6 Dirk Nowitzki, DAL 5 26.01
7 Tim Duncan, SAS 5 25.89
8 Pau Gasol, LAL 4 24.23
9 Tracy McGrady, HOU 6 24.09
10 Kevin Garnett, BOS 6 23.70
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
RoxFan08
Veteran
Posts: 2,775
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 14, 2007

 

Post#2 » by RoxFan08 » Sat May 3, 2008 2:50 pm

Nice work by Tony Parker. He's having a monster playoffs.
Image
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,723
And1: 25,576
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#3 » by hermes » Sat May 3, 2008 3:02 pm

no surprise paul is way ahead
User avatar
dacher
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,729
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 20, 2003

 

Post#4 » by dacher » Sat May 3, 2008 3:05 pm

#6 #9 are out
#10 pushed to game 7

:rofl: Luke @ #11


Nash #47 = Suns ftl
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#5 » by dockingsched » Sat May 3, 2008 3:08 pm

the kobe effect in full force with pau at 8 and luke at 11.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,148
And1: 9,859
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#6 » by Blame Rasho » Sat May 3, 2008 3:55 pm

Paul was beastly vs the Mavs...
BROWN
RealGM
Posts: 10,955
And1: 74
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: RealCity - MTL

 

Post#7 » by BROWN » Sat May 3, 2008 5:09 pm

No hawks in the top 10. wow
User avatar
Basileus777
General Manager
Posts: 7,822
And1: 2,051
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: New Jersey
 

 

Post#8 » by Basileus777 » Sat May 3, 2008 5:28 pm

brownwarriors wrote:No hawks in the top 10. wow


Bad performances in Boston probably killed their #s.
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

 

Post#9 » by That Nicka » Sat May 3, 2008 6:13 pm

LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKEE
User avatar
2poor
RealGM
Posts: 11,684
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 17, 2006
Location: I'm from the city in the midwest best city in the whole wide wide world

 

Post#10 » by 2poor » Sat May 3, 2008 6:19 pm

JR Smith at #14 was Denver's highest PER. Speaks volumes.
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#11 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sat May 3, 2008 6:31 pm

dcash4 wrote:the kobe effect in full force with pau at 8 and luke at 11.


?? Is it the David West effect that has Chris Paul first?

Anyway, nice list. Funny how the top performers in PER and who we observe as the best performers in the first round are nothing alike, because PER is a crappy stat. Oh wait...
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#12 » by dockingsched » Sat May 3, 2008 6:33 pm

ILikeTheGrizz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



?? Is it the David West effect that has Chris Paul first?

Anyway, nice list. Funny how the top performers in PER and who we observe as the best performers in the first round are nothing alike, because PER is a crappy stat. Oh wait...


:lol:
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
eatyourchildren
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,501
And1: 11
Joined: Mar 26, 2007

 

Post#13 » by eatyourchildren » Sat May 3, 2008 6:37 pm

ILikeTheGrizz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



?? Is it the David West effect that has Chris Paul first?

Anyway, nice list. Funny how the top performers in PER and who we observe as the best performers in the first round are nothing alike, because PER is a crappy stat. Oh wait...


PER is so good that coaching staffs use it to select their starting lineups Oh wait...
ugkfan2681" wrote: wrote: i dont take **** lightly im from the land of the trill home of the rockets RESPECT OK.
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#14 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sat May 3, 2008 6:42 pm

eatyourchildren wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



PER is so good that coaching staffs use it to select their starting lineups Oh wait...


Nice coherent argument!!!
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
User avatar
eatyourchildren
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,501
And1: 11
Joined: Mar 26, 2007

 

Post#15 » by eatyourchildren » Sat May 3, 2008 6:42 pm

BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG (which took years and years of research, trial and error, and multiple rounds of predictive empiricism to develop):

1. Kobe
2. Lebron
3. TP
4. TMac
5. Dirk
6. Timmeh
7. CP
8. AI
9. Bosh
10. Amare
ugkfan2681" wrote: wrote: i dont take **** lightly im from the land of the trill home of the rockets RESPECT OK.
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#16 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sat May 3, 2008 6:44 pm

eatyourchildren wrote:BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG


Unsubscribe. See ya.
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
User avatar
eatyourchildren
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,501
And1: 11
Joined: Mar 26, 2007

 

Post#17 » by eatyourchildren » Sat May 3, 2008 6:47 pm

Aw, don't run away. Maybe we could debate about appeals to authority again?
ugkfan2681" wrote: wrote: i dont take **** lightly im from the land of the trill home of the rockets RESPECT OK.
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#18 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sat May 3, 2008 6:54 pm

LOL or this!

eatyourchildren wrote:BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG


I think I might have a new sig, actually. Or an addition.

Ya know, on another board I frequent there's a usre named "The Idiot Collector". He never posts anything (clearly a someone else) and every once in awhile just quotes someone and says "Collected". If he were here, you'd have been collected by now.
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
User avatar
eatyourchildren
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,501
And1: 11
Joined: Mar 26, 2007

 

Post#19 » by eatyourchildren » Sat May 3, 2008 7:06 pm

ILikeTheGrizz wrote:LOL or this!

-= original quote snipped =-



I think I might have a new sig, actually. Or an addition.

Ya know, on another board I frequent there's a usre named "The Idiot Collector". He never posts anything (clearly a someone else) and every once in awhile just quotes someone and says "Collected". If he were here, you'd have been collected by now.


Thanks for catching the facetiousness of my argument. Btw, you inspired me for my new sig, too.

I thought you unsubscribed me?
ugkfan2681" wrote: wrote: i dont take **** lightly im from the land of the trill home of the rockets RESPECT OK.
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#20 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sat May 3, 2008 7:07 pm

It's jsut a clever way to say "That was idiotic". You didn't know that? Anyway, tell us more about how PER and PPG are equal in value, I'm dying to hear.
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG

Return to The General Board