Who is the better PG? Isiah "Zeke" Thomas or Chris

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

carlos1223
Banned User
Posts: 847
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 23, 2008

Who is the better PG? Isiah "Zeke" Thomas or Chris 

Post#1 » by carlos1223 » Sun May 4, 2008 7:04 am

I have noticed this comparison being brought up quite a few times. It is a valid comparison. Who is better Zeke or CP3?
richboy
RealGM
Posts: 25,424
And1: 2,487
Joined: Sep 01, 2003

 

Post#2 » by richboy » Sun May 4, 2008 7:26 am

I think CP3 will be better than Isiah when its all said and done.
User avatar
Heat3
RealGM
Posts: 20,398
And1: 16,173
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: Where all the children are above average.
Contact:
   

 

Post#3 » by Heat3 » Sun May 4, 2008 7:48 am

one guy has won multiple championships and is in the hall of fame. the other guy is having a pretty good season...
Pat Riley wrote:There are only two options regarding commitment. You're either IN or you're OUT. There is no such thing as life in-between.

James Johnson wrote:The culture is REAL.

Image
Aboozer
Sophomore
Posts: 147
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Location: Europe

 

Post#4 » by Aboozer » Sun May 4, 2008 8:12 am

Isiah is better as a player, but we might need to reevaluate this quite soon.
Chris Paul is definitely better as GM. Really, could you find any worse? :)
jab
Starter
Posts: 2,321
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 25, 2004
Location: Detroit: Where only the strong survive cause the weak are eaten alive!

 

Post#5 » by jab » Sun May 4, 2008 10:01 am

Heat3 wrote:one guy has won multiple championships and is in the hall of fame. the other guy is having a pretty good season...
User avatar
gavran
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 8,953
Joined: Nov 02, 2005
Location: crossing the line

 

Post#6 » by gavran » Sun May 4, 2008 10:37 am

Isiah, by a mile. I really like Paul, but this comparision is just too early. He had a historocal season, but Thomas had several similar seasons, and a few better. He's on the same level as Isiah was in his 3rd year though, but don't forget that in his 4th year Isiah averaged 21 and 14 for Christ sake, with 2.3 steals and 4.5 rebounds. If Paul has a similar season next year, then it'll make this comparison valid.
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

 

Post#7 » by Point forward » Sun May 4, 2008 10:44 am

Zeke is a legend, Paul still a young buck. Paul CAN be as great as Zeke, but he has a LONG way to go.
Harmless
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 11, 2004
Location: Philippines

 

Post#8 » by Harmless » Sun May 4, 2008 10:51 am

ZOMG another "young superstar player who hasn't proven much" vs "old retired superstar player who finished his career already" poll.

Can't we wait until they finish their careers before comparing? I mean, I hate Isiah and I think he's overrated and all, but I think this is a little premature.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,088
And1: 20,040
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#9 » by NO-KG-AI » Sun May 4, 2008 10:53 am

"pretty good season"

Yea rly.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
writerman
Banned User
Posts: 6,836
And1: 5
Joined: Sep 02, 2002

It just kills me... 

Post#10 » by writerman » Sun May 4, 2008 12:49 pm

how many posters here are all too ready to make favorable comparisons between their flavor of the month and the true legends.

I hate Thomas. I hated him as a player because he was the leader of the worst bunch of scumbags to ever infest the NBA, I hated him when he was the coach of the Pacers, and he's shown in his life since his playing days that he's a total jerk.

The Paul kid may be talented, but he's got light years to go and a hell of a lot to prove before he'll measure up to Thomas.
User avatar
GoBobcats
Veteran
Posts: 2,780
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Location: Switzerland

 

Post#11 » by GoBobcats » Sun May 4, 2008 1:01 pm

richboy wrote:I think CP3 will be better than Isiah when its all said and done.

:nod:
Image
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#12 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sun May 4, 2008 2:41 pm

If you only wanted one season, it's pretty clearly Paul this year. If you wanted a career, it's pretty clearly Isiah because who knows what Paul will do.

Really not that hard to answer that way.
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
Copperhead
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,060
And1: 55
Joined: Dec 28, 2005

 

Post#13 » by Copperhead » Sun May 4, 2008 5:30 pm

Everytime people compare Chris to a guy who's retired or has had a long 'career', they want to compare that guys long career to CP's 3 years. At least statistically, CP in his 1st 3 years, was better than Isiah's first 3 years. How about comparing them to what each of them did in their 1st 3 years rather than comparing CP's 3 years to Isiah's 12 or 13.

But then again, most younguns here didn't even see Isiah in his first 3 years.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,529
And1: 18,041
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

 

Post#14 » by Schad » Sun May 4, 2008 6:12 pm

If one assumes that Paul's '07/'08 season will be his standard for the next decade, then he will surpass Thomas when all is said and done. But it is still way too early to assume that to be the case.
Image
**** your asterisk.
carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

 

Post#15 » by carrottop12 » Sun May 4, 2008 7:14 pm

In a situation like this we should take CP3's best season, and compare it to either the final year of the opposing players career, or just their worst statistical season, that way Paul is always better, which most people think anyways.
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#16 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sun May 4, 2008 7:16 pm

Batronuj wrote:In a situation like this we should take CP3's best season, and compare it to either the final year of the opposing players career, or just their worst statistical season, that way Paul is always better, which most people think anyways.


Cry more.
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
Prop
Veteran
Posts: 2,841
And1: 34
Joined: Jul 16, 2004

Re: It just kills me... 

Post#17 » by Prop » Sun May 4, 2008 7:41 pm

writerman wrote:how many posters here are all too ready to make favorable comparisons between their flavor of the month and the true legends.

I hate Thomas. I hated him as a player because he was the leader of the worst bunch of scumbags to ever infest the NBA, I hated him when he was the coach of the Pacers, and he's shown in his life since his playing days that he's a total jerk.

The Paul kid may be talented, but he's got light years to go and a hell of a lot to prove before he'll measure up to Thomas.


???
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#18 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sun May 4, 2008 7:48 pm

writerman hates everyone that's not from the Pacers or the 60s, don't mind him, he's seriously senile and needs a nurse to find the computer to type his billshut.
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG
Prop
Veteran
Posts: 2,841
And1: 34
Joined: Jul 16, 2004

 

Post#19 » by Prop » Sun May 4, 2008 8:51 pm

ILikeTheGrizz wrote:writerman hates everyone that's not from the Pacers or the 60s, don't mind him, he's seriously senile and needs a nurse to find the computer to type his billshut.


if he's alluding to how dirty and physical they were, i'm a little confused. this is the same guy who fawns over how rough and tough and full of cheap shots basketball used to be.

"if you threw down a huge dunk you'd get your eye socket broken next time you came in the lane, the game used to be so pure, there's nothing but prissy little wimps now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
User avatar
ILikeTheGrizz
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2008

 

Post#20 » by ILikeTheGrizz » Sun May 4, 2008 8:57 pm

He's full of so many hypocrisies that there's really no point in reading his posts. I've learned that now. In TrueLAFan's thread about the average NBA player year-by-year (adjusted for pace) he gave a pretty convincing argument for NBA play and players being pretty even throughout eras. writerman got a big boner for it and said that's what he's been talking about. Since then, I've called him out three times saying play in the 60s was way better than now, or the 90s or whenever, and asked him how that makes sense wth what he said in TrueLAFan's thread.

Three times he's ignored me because he knows he can't, he knows he's hypocritical, and he knows the more he talks the deeper he digs his grave.
eatyourchildren wrote: BTW, PER is also as good a stat as PPG

Return to Player Comparisons