ImageImageImage

Childress Would Look Good In Green

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
Datruth345
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,903
And1: 442
Joined: Nov 25, 2005
 

Childress Would Look Good In Green 

Post#1 » by Datruth345 » Sun May 4, 2008 9:17 pm

...Just Saying

Atlanta has the qualifying offer in 08/09, free agent in 09/10

i'd put a haircut cut clause in his contract though, fro has got to go
"...That, Mr. James, is etched in stone.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
Al n' Perk No Layups!
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,532
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2006

Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green 

Post#2 » by Al n' Perk No Layups! » Sun May 4, 2008 9:31 pm

SuperDeluxe wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Either the fro or the face. The fro is fine and the face is fine too, but for some reason the combination doesn't look right.


I agree, Livingston has the same thing. He looks very awkward with a fro.
User avatar
SuperDeluxe
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,954
And1: 23,611
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
   

Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green 

Post#3 » by SuperDeluxe » Sun May 4, 2008 9:32 pm

Datruth345 wrote: fro has got to go


Either the fro or the face. The fro is fine and the face is fine too, but for some reason the combination doesn't look right.
User avatar
SonicYouth34
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,575
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by SonicYouth34 » Sun May 4, 2008 10:16 pm

Childress' fro looks fine, if anything it should get bigger like Big Ben's
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
1,2,3 Ubuntu.
Big Baby
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,336
And1: 656
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

 

Post#5 » by Big Baby » Sun May 4, 2008 10:20 pm

Shoot. Forget Childress. I'd be thrilled if we had gotten the #3 pick last year and got Horford to go with Big Al. I hated his ass in the series, but would be pumped if we had him. With him and Big Al, we would've been SET for 15 years.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,063
And1: 9,041
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

 

Post#6 » by ParticleMan » Sun May 4, 2008 10:26 pm

childress would be a nice posey replacement in a couple of years. but he seems to be one of those guys who always plays his best against us. not so good against the rest of the L.
User avatar
SonicYouth34
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,575
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Contact:

 

Post#7 » by SonicYouth34 » Sun May 4, 2008 10:29 pm

Big Baby wrote:Shoot. Forget Childress. I'd be thrilled if we had gotten the #3 pick last year and got Horford to go with Big Al. I hated his ass in the series, but would be pumped if we had him. With him and Big Al, we would've been SET for 15 years.


I was thinking the same thing, if our frontline was PP, AJ, AH we'd have the best balance of defense and offensive, IMO, the entire league
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
1,2,3 Ubuntu.
Pats19andO
Banned User
Posts: 1,721
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 19, 2007
Location: Mr.Ferguson, meet Donovan. Donovan, Robert's neck.

 

Post#8 » by Pats19andO » Sun May 4, 2008 10:46 pm

The real question: Tony or Childress?
DelMonte West
Veteran
Posts: 2,945
And1: 685
Joined: Jan 10, 2006

Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green 

Post#9 » by DelMonte West » Sun May 4, 2008 10:55 pm

Datruth345 wrote:
i'd put a haircut cut clause in his contract though, fro has got to go


It's (most likely) there because the guy has really big ears...the fro takes the attention away.

Reminds me of one of the guys on ESPN's "Sports Reporters" show...has long, badly cut hair to cover up his gigantic ears...don't know his name though.
Gomes3PC
General Manager
Posts: 7,701
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

 

Post#10 » by Gomes3PC » Sun May 4, 2008 11:01 pm

SonicYouth34 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I was thinking the same thing, if our frontline was PP, AJ, AH we'd have the best balance of defense and offensive, IMO, the entire league

If we got the 3rd pick we'd likely have traded Pierce and gone for a full blown rebuilding mode.
sox839
Senior
Posts: 575
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 12, 2003

childress howabout someone else 

Post#11 » by sox839 » Mon May 5, 2008 12:26 am

I thought after johnson and horford the guywhoplayed best for atlanta was pachulia. He brought them lots of energy. It is crazy that he played for two otheer teams he would be a nice pickup because we do lack some height and we are thin at center PJ and Pollard are both washed up. Maybe we draft a young guy to backup perk for some minutes.
User avatar
kmgarnett21
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,868
And1: 398
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
       

 

Post#12 » by kmgarnett21 » Mon May 5, 2008 2:14 am

i think he has the fro b/c he's self concious about his HUGE ears. if u notice his ears, they like dumbo's ears, but its hidden due to his fro. if he had a fade or was bald, he'd prolly float up in midair b/c his ears would get caught in the wind.
User avatar
SmoothLikeButta
Sophomore
Posts: 203
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 05, 2006

 

Post#13 » by SmoothLikeButta » Mon May 5, 2008 5:12 am

agreed^

Image
Image
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 16,968
And1: 10,631
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

 

Post#14 » by return2glory » Mon May 5, 2008 5:27 am

Pats19andO wrote:The real question: Tony or Childress?


Tony who? Allen? I'd take Childress without question. Tony Allen is pretty much done. He might be out of the league in a 1 or 2 if he doesn't recovery mentally and physically fro the 2 knee injuriers.

Childress is a great young talent, something that TA was before he got hurt. Childress is one of the best bench players in this league. I would love it if we had him.
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

 

Post#15 » by GuyClinch » Mon May 5, 2008 10:51 am

TA has looked good in garbage time of late.. I'd like to see him get more minutes. He can get in there and hack Lebron a few times. Though he is smaller he has the quickness to try to keep him out of the lane.

Pete
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green 

Post#16 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon May 5, 2008 3:45 pm

Datruth345 wrote:...Just Saying

Atlanta has the qualifying offer in 08/09, free agent in 09/10

i'd put a haircut cut clause in his contract though, fro has got to go


You beat me to it, his fro looks (Please Use More Appropriate Word). Maybe it was "HaHa" funny in college, but it's lame now.

Also, dude needs to work on his shot...ugliest shot in the league!
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Childress Would Look Good In Green 

Post#17 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon May 5, 2008 3:46 pm

DelMonte West wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



It's (most likely) there because the guy has really big ears...the fro takes the attention away.

Reminds me of one of the guys on ESPN's "Sports Reporters" show...has long, badly cut hair to cover up his gigantic ears...don't know his name though.


Mitch Albom.

That guy has HUGE ears...they are Ferengi ears (anyone here watch Star Trek).
It's still 17 to 11!!!!

Return to Boston Celtics