Round 2: Spurs VS Hornets

Moderator: G R E Y

Vertical Limit
RealGM
Posts: 11,835
And1: 7,351
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
     

 

Post#81 » by Vertical Limit » Tue May 6, 2008 6:39 pm

Any chance of line up changes for next game?
Image
HarlemHeat37
Banned User
Posts: 6,570
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 14, 2006

 

Post#82 » by HarlemHeat37 » Tue May 6, 2008 6:58 pm

I'd really like for them to make Paul a shooter..put Parker on him, and make him beat us with his jumper..
User avatar
johnnyjohnnyjohnny
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,252
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 22, 2005

 

Post#83 » by johnnyjohnnyjohnny » Tue May 6, 2008 7:37 pm

Vertical Limit wrote:Any chance of line up changes for next game?


Doubtful. If anything, I think we see rotation changes. I think we see Barry in more key minutes during the game. I HOPE we see Barry in more key minutes during the game, he's the second best outside shooter in the gym behind Peja.
*** Having a NICE NAVY DAY ***
User avatar
SD2042
Senior Mod - Grizzlies
Senior Mod - Grizzlies
Posts: 24,772
And1: 2,501
Joined: Mar 05, 2002
   

 

Post#84 » by SD2042 » Tue May 6, 2008 9:54 pm

HarlemHeat37 wrote:I'd really like for them to make Paul a shooter..put Parker on him, and make him beat us with his jumper..


That would be the primary option to do against someone of CP3's calibur. Turn a slasher into a shooter. In the case of TP, he isn't known for his better defense. And even if the Spurs were to close down the interior. He finds a way to dish out to his teammates. The Spurs would have to do a better job rotating on defense in order to keep the pressure on New Orleans.
HarlemHeat37
Banned User
Posts: 6,570
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 14, 2006

 

Post#85 » by HarlemHeat37 » Wed May 7, 2008 3:18 am

I actually find Parker to be a below average defender, so that wasn't the reason I'd put him on him..I think at this point, we're better off putting Bowen on Peja..so put Parker and Paul, and make him shoot jumpers..Tony definitely has the quickness to stay in front of him, so just force him to take the J as much as possible..

honestly though, I'm not even worried about the defense..it has only let us down in the 2nd half, and we wouldn't be talking about this if the offense was showing anything positive..at some point, we just have to score..
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,248
And1: 2,054
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#86 » by Ballings7 » Wed May 7, 2008 3:28 am

Parker when committed and picking his spots, is an above-average defender, though

And overall, not a liability
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
User avatar
D-Weaver
Analyst
Posts: 3,174
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007
Location: Possibly the only simultaneous Warriors-Spurs fan on the planet...

 

Post#87 » by D-Weaver » Wed May 7, 2008 4:01 am

I said it already prior to Game 2. Have Paul try and score 40 on us by shooting from 20 feet and beyond. He had 37% on threes this eason, which is by no means bad, but from what I
Image
ceperez
Ballboy
Posts: 41
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2006

lack of explosiveness in offense 

Post#88 » by ceperez » Wed May 7, 2008 11:18 am

The problem with the Spurs is that they've completely lacked offensive explosiveness this year. They've rarely blown out teams this year.

The problem is that offense is too focused on the big three and nobody else seems to step up.

The first half of game 1 had some good distribution, unfortunately Tim Duncan was completely absent. However, despite having a high percentage on that half, the Hornets were still close.

What's even worse is that they need to have stops. I haven't seen them do this with the Hornets.
User avatar
Donald Kaufman
General Manager
Posts: 8,409
And1: 602
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
 

Re: lack of explosiveness in offense 

Post#89 » by Donald Kaufman » Wed May 7, 2008 11:40 am

ceperez wrote:The problem with the Spurs is that they've completely lacked offensive explosiveness this year. They've rarely blown out teams this year.


Exactly.

07-08 Point Differential +4.79
06-07 Point Differential +8.40
04-05 Point Differential +7.80

Record when we score 100+ = 27-1
Record when opponent scores 100+ = 5-10

Record in playoffs when we score 100+ = 3-0
Record in playoffs when opponent scores 100+ = 1-3

So as long as we score 100, we're fine. Easier said than done, I know.
User avatar
johnnyjohnnyjohnny
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,252
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 22, 2005

Re: lack of explosiveness in offense 

Post#90 » by johnnyjohnnyjohnny » Wed May 7, 2008 12:20 pm

ceperez wrote:What's even worse is that they need to have stops. I haven't seen them do this with the Hornets.


Exactly! That's why we need to figure out 'who' to contain and 'how'. When we score, they score. When we don't score, they score. I don't recall them going into any significant scoring draughts.

However, over the last few weeks of the season we became notorious for having a 'dead quarter' in each game, usually occuring in the 2nd half.
*** Having a NICE NAVY DAY ***
EZGOIN
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,687
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 19, 2002

 

Post#91 » by EZGOIN » Thu May 8, 2008 3:06 am

bbfan_1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Heh, you look foolish at this point no matter what happens in the end.


Exactly how do I look foolish? I'm not sure if you are aware of this but this is a basketball forum. So I log on and throw out my opinion on basketball related topics. At the beginning of this series I thought the Spurs would beat the Hornets in 5-6 games (Normally I would have said 5 but the Hornets had home court advantage). So as crazy as this sounds, I decided to post this.

Here's the bottom line - So far I've been WRONG. I'm big enough to admit this. Right now the Spurs look old and a little too confident/arrogant.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,324
And1: 10,095
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#92 » by Blame Rasho » Thu May 8, 2008 3:30 am

Do or Die time... we have to win the next game.
User avatar
Donald Kaufman
General Manager
Posts: 8,409
And1: 602
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
 

 

Post#93 » by Donald Kaufman » Thu May 8, 2008 3:39 am

EZGOIN wrote:Right now the Spurs look old and a little too confident/arrogant.


I disagree. I think we look shaky and lacking in confidence altogether, which is part of the problem. I don't buy for a second that the Spurs are an arrogant team.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,324
And1: 10,095
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#94 » by Blame Rasho » Thu May 8, 2008 3:43 am

Turnover King wrote:I disagree. I think we look shaky and lacking in confidence altogether, in the 2nd half of games which is part of the problem. I don't buy for a second that the Spurs are an arrogant team.
User avatar
Donald Kaufman
General Manager
Posts: 8,409
And1: 602
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
 

 

Post#95 » by Donald Kaufman » Thu May 8, 2008 3:52 am

^^^ Yeah true. Our 1st halves have actually been good.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,324
And1: 10,095
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#96 » by Blame Rasho » Thu May 8, 2008 3:54 am

Turnover King wrote:^^^ Yeah true. Our 1st halves have actually been good.


You can't half ass your way to a W vs a team with Chris Paul.
User avatar
Donald Kaufman
General Manager
Posts: 8,409
And1: 602
Joined: Aug 10, 2004
 

 

Post#97 » by Donald Kaufman » Thu May 8, 2008 3:57 am

Def not. The poise of this guy is just unbelievable. He has a chance, when it's all said and done, to be the best of all time at PG. He's that good.
EZGOIN
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,687
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 19, 2002

 

Post#98 » by EZGOIN » Thu May 8, 2008 4:18 am

Turnover King wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I disagree. I think we look shaky and lacking in confidence altogether, which is part of the problem. I don't buy for a second that the Spurs are an arrogant team.


I don't see how there could be a lack of confidence. They played brilliantly late in games against the Suns and never showed any signs of being nervous or lacking in confidence.

I think they're overconfident right now. They beat a team that many people had winning that series as well as the championship. They did it by executing down the stretch and overcoming double digit deficits. They came into this series expecting the Hornets to roll over and fall on their faces late in games. There was a lack of urgency in both of the games. An urgency that was there in 4 of the 5 games against the Suns.

I don't think the Spurs are an "arrogant team" but I do think that they came into this series with an arrogant attitude or a feeling that they didn't have to put forth the same effort against the Hornets that they did in the Suns series (which to me is the same thing). Just look at NOH offensive rebounding from game 1. It was ridiculous. That's what cost them that game IMO (along with the 5,000 3's they put up) and it had nothing to do with Chris Paul or David West or any other matchup problem.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,248
And1: 2,054
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#99 » by Ballings7 » Thu May 8, 2008 4:27 am

I'll be shocked if Pop doesn't put Bowen onto Peja primarily...
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
HarlemHeat37
Banned User
Posts: 6,570
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 14, 2006

 

Post#100 » by HarlemHeat37 » Thu May 8, 2008 4:59 am

Pop better not be stubborn tomorrow..

Return to San Antonio Spurs