OT: I know, I know, I know

ermocrate · Post #41 » by **ermocrate** » Wed May 7, 2008 10:49 pm

hiphop1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

And how good was the rest of the team?

Maybe that's the reason he scores? As said he's a Ricky Davis.

Datruth345 · Post #42 » by **Datruth345** » Thu May 8, 2008 4:33 am

hiphop1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

And how good was the rest of the team?

not very good obviously

4HISDAMNSELF ENT. · Post #43 » by **4HISDAMNSELF ENT.** » Thu May 8, 2008 6:17 am

Hmm.. interesting.

Well if anything.. I still feel like we need help on PG and C despite how well Rondo and Perkins have been playing as of late.

How about a trade for Baron Davis?

Boston trades:
Ray Allen and Rajon Rondo

Boston receives:
Baron Davis and Andris Bendrins

Starting Lineup after the trade:

PG - B. Davis
SG - T. Allen
SF - P. Pierce
PF - K. Garnett
C - A. Bendrins

Nice!

But then again, I didn't check the trade checker on this one..

Datruth345 · Post #44 » by **Datruth345** » Thu May 8, 2008 6:38 am

Lol....no

hiphop1 · Post #45 » by **hiphop1** » Thu May 8, 2008 10:44 am

4HISDAMNSELF ENT. wrote:Hmm.. interesting.

Well if anything.. I still feel like we need help on PG and C despite how well Rondo and Perkins have been playing as of late.

How about a trade for Baron Davis?

Boston trades:
Ray Allen and Rajon Rondo

Boston receives:
Baron Davis and Andris Bendrins

Starting Lineup after the trade:

PG - B. Davis
SG - T. Allen
SF - P. Pierce
PF - K. Garnett
C - A. Bendrins

Nice!

But then again, I didn't check the trade checker on this one..

I am a big fan of BDavis. But Rondo is going to be a star in this league. Rondo has the "IT" factor. I still like the NYK deal.

P2 · Post #46 » by P2 » Thu May 8, 2008 12:45 pm

Call me crazy, but I would actually do that deal, granted that we can get a really promising rookie who can contribute right away as a part of the rotation with that 15th pick.

MyInsatiableOne · Post #47 » by **MyInsatiableOne** » Thu May 8, 2008 1:12 pm

P2 wrote:Call me crazy, but I would actually do that deal, granted that we can get a really promising rookie who can contribute right away as a part of the rotation with that 15th pick.

^You crazy! :crazy:

eitanr · Post #48 » by **eitanr** » Thu May 8, 2008 4:54 pm

The fact is the C's would not need Shaq to play 82 games this past season, they'd just need him for the playoffs. Shaq still forces double teams in the post and is aggressive around the hoop. Those are 2 major items the C's are lacking. These playoffs are exposing those weaknesses.

As for the Suns, they do this deal since Nash and Allen expire the same time. It allows PHX to run and gun and try it better that way (instead of meshing styles) until Nash and Allen expire.