Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
Moderator: THE J0KER
Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,892
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 03, 2008
- Contact:
Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
I really thought one of them would be on for sure. I guess not.
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 13
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
big123 wrote:I really thought one of them would be on for sure. I guess not.
why? neither deserved it.
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 769
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 19, 2006
- Location: Denver, CO
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
reverendJim wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
why? neither deserved it.
yet Tmac and Paul Pierce did???
Melo got snubbed nobody should be suprised though.
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,892
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 03, 2008
- Contact:
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
reverendJim wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
why? neither deserved it.
Why don't they deserve it? They both had great individual seasons and arguably the best of their careers. I honestly thought one of them would make the 3rd team. I'm a little suprised that both got snubbed.
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
- etopn23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,072
- And1: 160
- Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
The Rockets were better than the Nuggets without Yao. That's why T-Mac made an all NBA team, he doesn't put up empty stats. I can't even imagine what McGrady would do if he was on a team as stacked as the Nuggets.EMB6903 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
yet Tmac and Paul Pierce did???
Melo got snubbed nobody should be suprised though.
It's a different game when you don't see doubles from half court down.
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
- JRmakes_it_rain
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 845
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 18, 2006
- Location: The Fort CO.
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
etopn23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
The Rockets were better than the Nuggets without Yao. That's why T-Mac made an all NBA team, he doesn't put up empty stats. I can't even imagine what McGrady would do if he was on a team as stacked as the Nuggets.
It's a different game when you don't see doubles from half court down.
Obviously the rockets were better then the nuggets without Yao....because in a must win game the rockets only got beat by what?...20 points by the nuggets.....better teams usually get smacked in must win games on the regular. You're no better then us untill somebody actually gets to the 2nd round. T-mac is as one dimensional as AI and Melo.....You ask what would T-mac do on the nuggets? My guess is smoke weed, have a lazy eye, not play d (since he doesn't now), and be a volume scorer.....and not make it to the 2nd round.
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
- pickaxe
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,696
- And1: 66
- Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
big123 wrote:I really thought one of them would be on for sure. I guess not.
I think any help Iverson has provided is not readily apparent.
All though we have lots of guys with talent, no one had a breakaway year as an individual. Yet the team did not have a breakaway year as a team. If the results had spoken for themselves, Melo or AI easily could have picked it up. No results, no individual bests = no All-NBA
While we know he is a spark-plug and keeps the team going, no one noticed.
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 769
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 19, 2006
- Location: Denver, CO
Re: Both AI and Melo get snubbed on All-NBA teams
etopn23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
The Rockets were better than the Nuggets without Yao. That's why T-Mac made an all NBA team, he doesn't put up empty stats. I can't even imagine what McGrady would do if he was on a team as stacked as the Nuggets.
It's a different game when you don't see doubles from half court down.
Iverson played 82 games while leading the NBA in minutes played, had more ppg, apg, better FG% then Tracy Mcgrady while adding 2 steals per game... Mcgrady only played 66 games and started 62. there is no way Tmac deserves it over AI, sorry.
and stop acting Like Denver is some stacked team, we had horrible pg play and no big gave us a post presense aside from Nene's 15 or so apperences.
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 238
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 20, 2008
Well i'm going to say that both of them deserved to be on the lists. I'm confused on how they go about selecting these things at this point. Is it by individual statistics or team wins or what? Because statistically...i'm not sure if Paul Pierce has been better then Carmelo this year. Boston has had a great season, thats for sure. But again, what are these based on?
Iversons stats are better then Manus, T-Macs, Steve Nash and D-Wills. All of them are deserving, yes, but it seems as if people have a different set of rules depending on which player it is. I would keep Nash and D-Will (i'm happy D-Will is getting some love because it seems as if everyones focus is on CP3 right now), but Manu or Tracy could be replaced. It's just strange to see a player like AI that has been on these lists for so many seasons, never had a problem making them before... and then just barely miss it. Oh well, the lists are made already and its done...no need crying over spilt milk. Good luck to them next season.
Iversons stats are better then Manus, T-Macs, Steve Nash and D-Wills. All of them are deserving, yes, but it seems as if people have a different set of rules depending on which player it is. I would keep Nash and D-Will (i'm happy D-Will is getting some love because it seems as if everyones focus is on CP3 right now), but Manu or Tracy could be replaced. It's just strange to see a player like AI that has been on these lists for so many seasons, never had a problem making them before... and then just barely miss it. Oh well, the lists are made already and its done...no need crying over spilt milk. Good luck to them next season.
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,892
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 03, 2008
- Contact:
Ballin02 wrote:Well i'm going to say that both of them deserved to be on the lists. I'm confused on how they go about selecting these things at this point. Is it by individual statistics or team wins or what? Because statistically...i'm not sure if Paul Pierce has been better then Carmelo this year. Boston has had a great season, thats for sure. But again, what are these based on?
Iversons stats are better then Manus, T-Macs, Steve Nash and D-Wills. All of them are deserving, yes, but it seems as if people have a different set of rules depending on which player it is. I would keep Nash and D-Will (i'm happy D-Will is getting some love because it seems as if everyones focus is on CP3 right now), but Manu or Tracy could be replaced. It's just strange to see a player like AI that has been on these lists for so many seasons, never had a problem making them before... and then just barely miss it. Oh well, the lists are made already and its done...no need crying over spilt milk. Good luck to them next season.
It seems about team wins to me. 2 players each from the Celtics, Spurs, Jazz, Rockets and Suns. Then 1 each from the Lakers, Hornets, Magic and Mavs. Then Lebron. The Pistons had the 2nd best record in the league and the voters decided no one deserved it on that team, but 2 from every other team. Go figure.
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 238
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 20, 2008
big123 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
It seems about team wins to me. 2 players each from the Celtics, Spurs, Jazz, Rockets and Suns. Then 1 each from the Lakers, Hornets, Magic and Mavs. Then Lebron. The Pistons had the 2nd best record in the league and the voters decided no one deserved it on that team, but 2 from every other team. Go figure.
Yeah that Pistons situation got me too. The Pistons get no love.
