ImageImageImage

Rivers is an idiot!

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

 

Post#21 » by MyInsatiableOne » Wed May 7, 2008 1:26 pm

sully00 wrote:Those that can't play coach, those that don't have a clue about either one blame the coach.


:nod:
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

 

Post#22 » by Tricky Ricky » Wed May 7, 2008 1:28 pm

sully00 wrote:Those that can't play coach, those that don't have a clue about either one blame the coach.


Do you like his rotations?
CelticsWhat!
Pro Prospect
Posts: 884
And1: 1
Joined: May 22, 2003
Location: I'll be where I'm at!!

 

Post#23 » by CelticsWhat! » Wed May 7, 2008 1:50 pm

sully00 wrote:Those that can't play coach, those that don't have a clue about either one blame the coach.


:nod:
"If you drop a phonograph needle on Brasky's nipple, it plays the Beach Boys' 'Pet Sounds.'"
User avatar
DorfonCeltics
Analyst
Posts: 3,680
And1: 215
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

 

Post#24 » by DorfonCeltics » Wed May 7, 2008 1:59 pm

Cep wrote:Yea, but Z was on fire, and Powe had disrupted his shot before, as Davis had him opened a bunch of times. Z is a Celtic killer.


Don't take this personally but you're a moron. Did you watch any of the C's/Cavs games from the regular season? Other than KG, Davis probably did the best job guarding Z. He has the weight to push him off the block (something nobody else on the C's has) and does a great job at challenging his shooting hand. Baby plays Z almost completely fundamentally sound. That's why he was in there guarding Z. My guess is you were more frustrated with Davis on the offensive side of the ball where he didn't do much. Really though, you should watch the games more closely.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,063
And1: 9,041
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

 

Post#25 » by ParticleMan » Wed May 7, 2008 2:07 pm

Tricky Ricky wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Do you like his rotations?



his rotations won 66 games. i think they're fine.
User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

 

Post#26 » by Tricky Ricky » Wed May 7, 2008 3:10 pm

ParticleMan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




his rotations won 66 games. i think they're fine.


The playoffs are different than the season, I shouldve said do you like his playoff rotations?
User avatar
Taget
Analyst
Posts: 3,169
And1: 2,631
Joined: Apr 24, 2004
     

 

Post#27 » by Taget » Wed May 7, 2008 5:39 pm

We won despite our two wings having bad games. Of course it's a home game and I'd feel a lot more comfortable not to have any home games in doubt.

But this is the playoffs not the regular season when you could conceivably toss a coach. Hopefully after a lackluster game he makes the necessary adjustments and we hold home court advantage and win this series.

At this point all you can do is sit back and root for our team and wish Doc the best. If god forbid we end up getting tossed from the playoffs then and only then should we even be thinking about calling for heads.
[quote:545636310b="Darth Celtic"]man, these refs need to stop giving us the benefit of the doubt and start screwing us.[/quote]

Image
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

 

Post#28 » by MyInsatiableOne » Wed May 7, 2008 6:26 pm

Taget wrote:We won despite our two wings having bad games. Of course it's a home game and I'd feel a lot more comfortable not to have any home games in doubt.

But this is the playoffs not the regular season when you could conceivably toss a coach. Hopefully after a lackluster game he makes the necessary adjustments and we hold home court advantage and win this series.

At this point all you can do is sit back and root for our team and wish Doc the best. If god forbid we end up getting tossed from the playoffs then and only then should we even be thinking about calling for heads.


And even then, how smart would it be now that we finally have had some head coach stability and the players (especially the Big 3) like playing for him?
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
UGA Hayes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,022
And1: 19,727
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Location: real gm

 

Post#29 » by UGA Hayes » Wed May 7, 2008 7:00 pm

Let me first say I thought Doc did a better than credited job in the Atlanta series.

That being said I'm convinced yesterday's game was historic. It might have been the worst combined coaching performance by two coaches in a playoff game. I swear the coaches made the wrong move (or nonmove) every single chance they got.

We went through an amazing number of scoreless stretches yesterday including the beginning of the game, when the bench came on in the second quarter, after the first four points of the third quarter. And we didn't make any adjustments. We didn't put anyone in the game, we didn't call a timeout, we didn't take the ball out of the hands of the guys who were shooting poorly and turning the ball over.

Just b/c we played well defensively doen't mean we had to play poorly offensively. It wasn't their defense that was causing our poor play. It was the awful one on one crap RAy and Paul were doing, and the careless throwing away of the ball.

What I don't understand is why are substitution pattern is so damn rigid. Why don't we take guys out (cept Powe) when they have four bad possesions in a row. . Its not like we can't bring them back in. More disturbingly, such a pattern suggests you really aren't paying much attention to matchups. SA doesn't wait half a quarter to bring Ginobili in when things start off poorly.

Some games Rondo should play half a quarter some a whole quarter some 16 minutes straight. It should depend on the situation, not a preconcieved rotation. If Paul is playing that bad take him out. experiment with a rondo cassell lineup. So something.

Thankfully Mike Brown was even less imaginative. HE basically ran the same 3 plays the entire game.
ArmstrongInGreen
Pro Prospect
Posts: 956
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Location: right behind you

 

Post#30 » by ArmstrongInGreen » Thu May 8, 2008 12:42 am

yeah Doc's substituting was rediculous. he just totally disregards matchups and thinks he can sub guys the same way all the time. this is a series where we should see some eddie house. he won't get abused by the cleveland guards bringing the ball up and his defense is at least as good as cassells. his perimeter shooting was neeeeeeeeeeeeded yesterday.

the second thing that pisses me off about doc is his refusal to adjust the starting lineups ever. our best five players in this series are rondo/pierce/posey/garnett/perkins. i love ray ray but he should be coming off the bench. granted doc hasn't changed the starting lineup all year and he would get killed i'm sure for doing it now, but the point is, a coach like phil jackson will tweak his starting lineup however he sees fit or simply on a whim even and no one would ever think twice...
ArmstrongInGreen
Pro Prospect
Posts: 956
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Location: right behind you

 

Post#31 » by ArmstrongInGreen » Thu May 8, 2008 12:48 am

as far as doc rivers goes, we have a championship roster, but this team will go only as far as doc rivers will take them. HE is the limiting factor to our team, the only thing that can hold them back from banner 17, not the players on the roster.

lets put it this way, if phil jackson or popavich were our coach, i would be INFINITELY more confident in our team right now. and speaking of phil jackson, if we make it to the finals, i really really really do NOT want to play the Lakers. Jackson would outcoach Doc every game....
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

 

Post#32 » by MyInsatiableOne » Thu May 8, 2008 1:05 pm

ArmstrongInGreen wrote:as far as doc rivers goes, we have a championship roster, but this team will go only as far as doc rivers will take them. HE is the limiting factor to our team, the only thing that can hold them back from banner 17, not the players on the roster.

lets put it this way, if phil jackson or popavich were our coach, i would be INFINITELY more confident in our team right now. and speaking of phil jackson, if we make it to the finals, i really really really do NOT want to play the Lakers. Jackson would outcoach Doc every game....


Of course, because Doc is the one playing point guard, shooting guard, small forward, power forward, and center. He's the one taking all of those shots and playing defense and rebounding and dishing out assists and taking free throws. So he better do that all perfectly or it's all his fault.

Because the PLAYERS don't do anything, right?

:roll:

Again, I don't think Doc is perfect but all of you seem to have mental problems or something the way you blame him for **** EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING pertaining to this team. If someone goes down with an injury (God forbid), you'll all blame him for not looking into the future and seeing it and taking the guy out of the game.

(Please Use More Appropriate Word).
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#33 » by sully00 » Thu May 8, 2008 10:51 pm

So is Doc an idiot for sticking with his set rotation, or for changing his set rotation to adjust to the circumstances of the game? You can't have it both ways.

Doc is going to stay with the guys are who defending even if they are struggling offensively, because that is what has won 66 games and that is what won the game on Mon. We stopped CLE from scoring down the stretch, if you don't get that then your opinion of Doc doesn't really matter.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

 

Post#34 » by MyInsatiableOne » Fri May 9, 2008 1:06 pm

^^Thank you sully...that backs my argument up 100%.

By the way, Doc adjusted pretty well last night, dontcha think? 8)
It's still 17 to 11!!!!

Return to Boston Celtics