Could D'Antoni be our chance to unload contract garbage?
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Could D'Antoni be our chance to unload contract garbage?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
Could D'Antoni be our chance to unload contract garbage?
I remember in the not to distant past that we had discussed Mike D'Antoni wanting players like Mo Williams and Dan Gadzuric to fit his play style. Is there any chance that we could unload these kinds of players onto the Knicks?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,295
- And1: 196
- Joined: Feb 21, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 101,994
- And1: 55,062
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
- europa
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,919
- And1: 471
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
- Location: Right Behind You
Villanueva/Dez
FOR
David Lee/Malik Rose
Lee would be an upgrade over Villanueva and could either start at PF if Yi isn't ready or provide a strong backup. Rose brings a larger expiring deal than what Dez has. So that's a strong trade asset the Bucks could use at the deadline.
FOR
David Lee/Malik Rose
Lee would be an upgrade over Villanueva and could either start at PF if Yi isn't ready or provide a strong backup. Rose brings a larger expiring deal than what Dez has. So that's a strong trade asset the Bucks could use at the deadline.
Nothing will not break me.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,714
- And1: 9,547
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
It certainly couldn't hurt Milwaukee to have D'Antoni in NY. I don't think D'Antoni wants the Knicks job... he wants a win now job but is using the Knicks as leverage with the Bulls... and if the Bulls don't want to pay the big Bucks then I could see him settling for the Knicks.
He's certainly going to want to win tho, which isn't in the Knicks best interest this season.
He's certainly going to want to win tho, which isn't in the Knicks best interest this season.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
I just think that we have a lot of run and gun offensive players that play no defense, and that his system is predicated on just that kind of player. We might not need to unload garbage cap, but I think that we could easily unload players that don't fit our coach onto the Knicks.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: Could D'Antoni be our chance to unload contract garbage?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
Re: Could D'Antoni be our chance to unload contract garbage?
Balls2TheWalls wrote:I remember in the not to distant past that we had discussed Mike D'Antoni wanting players like Mo Williams and Dan Gadzuric to fit his play style. Is there any chance that we could unload these kinds of players onto the Knicks?
That style of play is going to be a lot harder to make successful without Nash or some other highly skilled point guard.
The Knicks don't have a good PG on their roster and if he took the Bulls job, Hinrich hardly fits that style of play. Hinrich is much more of a half court PG given he doesn't push the ball all that well and he doesn't penetrate the paint well.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,438
- And1: 11,242
- Joined: May 12, 2002
I agree. But I see more of a Gadz for Jerome James type deal.
Gadz obviously fits the uptempo style better than James, who may or may not be dead. Who knows?
Anyway, it shaves a year off of Gadz's deal for us, which brings it in line to expire with Simmons. That is huge, especially if we end up doing Redd for TT/Mobley/#6 or Hughes/#9 and/or Mo for Haslem. That brings all our expirings together for a trading bonanza 2 years from now.
Gadz obviously fits the uptempo style better than James, who may or may not be dead. Who knows?
Anyway, it shaves a year off of Gadz's deal for us, which brings it in line to expire with Simmons. That is huge, especially if we end up doing Redd for TT/Mobley/#6 or Hughes/#9 and/or Mo for Haslem. That brings all our expirings together for a trading bonanza 2 years from now.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,343
- And1: 4,113
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
-
midranger wrote:I agree. But I see more of a Gadz for Jerome James type deal.
Gadz obviously fits the uptempo style better than James, who may or may not be dead. Who knows?
Anyway, it shaves a year off of Gadz's deal for us, which brings it in line to expire with Simmons. That is huge, especially if we end up doing Redd for TT/Mobley/#6 or Hughes/#9 and/or Mo for Haslem. That brings all our expirings together for a trading bonanza 2 years from now.
I think that James could be a legitimate backup center as well. I think he could give us minutes, and an exit from New York could be an excellent way to get him back on track.
I, personally, think that the Clippers deal is too good to be true. Hughes/#9 seems more in line with something I could see us getting. I think we are going to either get only picks, or be saddled with another albatross contract. We are not going to be able to unload salary and get a high lottery pick as per the Clipper trade.