Jason Richardson vs. Rashard Lewis

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

who YOU got?

Poll ended at Wed Apr 8, 2009 1:59 pm

$hard Dolla Bills
8
47%
The 'Rich J'
6
35%
too close to call
3
18%
 
Total votes: 17

magicfan4life05
RealGM
Posts: 23,617
And1: 198
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !

Jason Richardson vs. Rashard Lewis 

Post#1 » by magicfan4life05 » Sat May 10, 2008 1:59 pm

Who is better right now?


Rashard Lewis
Orlando Magic
Position: F
Height: 6-10 Weight: 230
High School: Alief Elsik HS (TX)
Player file | Team stats
2007-08 Statistics
PPG 18.2
RPG 5.4
APG 2.4
SPG 1.2
BPG 0.5
FG% 0.455
FT% 0.838
3P% 0.409
MPG 38.0


VS


Jason Richardson
Charlotte Bobcats
Position: G-F
Height: 6-6 Weight: 225
College: Michigan State
Player file | Team stats
2007-08 Statistics
PPG 21.8
RPG 5.4
APG 3.1
SPG 1.4
BPG 0.7
FG% 0.441
FT% 0.752
3P% 0.406
MPG 38.4
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:

"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,848
And1: 2,010
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#2 » by Cammo101 » Sat May 10, 2008 3:46 pm

It's Shard and it ain't close.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,094
And1: 20,066
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#3 » by NO-KG-AI » Sat May 10, 2008 3:57 pm

I think it's J-Rich.

His 3 pt percentage was really impressive considering the attempts, and the supporting cast.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
BROWN
RealGM
Posts: 10,955
And1: 74
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: RealCity - MTL

 

Post#4 » by BROWN » Sat May 10, 2008 4:27 pm

Jrich, he's improved on his 3 pt shot, and hes one of the best rebounding guards.
LiquidFire
Banned User
Posts: 3,275
And1: 3
Joined: May 03, 2007

 

Post#5 » by LiquidFire » Sat May 10, 2008 4:31 pm

Cammo101 wrote:It's Shard and it ain't close.


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

you know your soft when you have a guard outrebounding a PF!
A.J.
Banned User
Posts: 12,072
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Houston(University of Houston in 2009)

 

Post#6 » by A.J. » Sat May 10, 2008 4:41 pm

Rashard Lewis
The Diesel
Veteran
Posts: 2,711
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 07, 2005

 

Post#7 » by The Diesel » Sat May 10, 2008 4:48 pm

Tough question; but I would pick Rashard.
User avatar
ronnymac2
RealGM
Posts: 11,008
And1: 5,077
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
   

 

Post#8 » by ronnymac2 » Sat May 10, 2008 5:04 pm

j-rich...His stats are relatively equal or better. And he doesn't get to play with Dwight Howard.
Pay no mind to the battles you've won
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
CaptainFanchini
Veteran
Posts: 2,617
And1: 141
Joined: May 29, 2006
Location: northern Italy

 

Post#9 » by CaptainFanchini » Sat May 10, 2008 5:13 pm

They are quite different: JR is more a SG-SF, while RL is more a SF-PF

On my personal team they would be a very good SF and PF duo.

I vote for both.
Basketball is my religion
TAI8
Banned User
Posts: 7,205
And1: 5
Joined: May 14, 2005

 

Post#10 » by TAI8 » Sat May 10, 2008 6:09 pm

Shard
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,848
And1: 2,010
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#11 » by Cammo101 » Sat May 10, 2008 7:33 pm

LiquidFire wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

you know your soft when you have a guard outrebounding a PF!


Let JRich play next to Dwight and we will see how low that rebounding number goes. Shard would have a lot more rebounds playing in the no big man land of Charlotte. It seems like people are punishing Shard here for not being on a terrible team with no help. Shard has taken a backseat to Dwight and to some degree Hedo in order to win games. That does not mean he should be judged specifically on his numbers.

Like I said, the answer is easily Shard and pretty much any NBA GM would agree.
Kosta
RealGM
Posts: 16,353
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 03, 2006

 

Post#12 » by Kosta » Sat May 10, 2008 7:37 pm

Cammo101 wrote:It's Shard and it ain't close.


The Magic would be far better off with J-Rich on their team...

Half the money, can play S.G, let's Hedo stay at SF and gives the Magic a shot at finding a real PF to play alongside Dwight with all the extra cash leftover...

The numbers are close, these guys are in the same class to me..
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

 

Post#13 » by Wade2k6 » Sat May 10, 2008 7:49 pm

Kosta wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



The Magic would be far better off with J-Rich on their team...

Half the money, can play S.G, let's Hedo stay at SF and gives the Magic a shot at finding a real PF to play alongside Dwight with all the extra cash leftover...

The numbers are close, these guys are in the same class to me..


Can't help but agree here.
halfHAVOC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,864
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Contact:
 

 

Post#14 » by halfHAVOC » Sun May 11, 2008 12:07 am

jrich
Stream My New Basketball Anthem "KING": https://ampl.ink/7QwkY
ISB
Rookie
Posts: 1,235
And1: 210
Joined: Nov 23, 2006

 

Post#15 » by ISB » Sun May 11, 2008 12:12 am

Rashard is a slightly better player IMO, but that contract really is bad.
Patterns
Banned User
Posts: 6,008
And1: 18
Joined: Sep 19, 2007

 

Post#16 » by Patterns » Sun May 11, 2008 12:17 am

Shard is the better player and it's obvious.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,094
And1: 20,066
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#17 » by NO-KG-AI » Sun May 11, 2008 2:34 am

Rashard:

PPG 18.2
RPG 5.4
APG 2.4
SPG 1.2
BPG 0.5
TO's 1.75
FG% 0.455
FT% 0.838
3P% 0.409

MPG 38.0
PER: 16.7
TS%: 59%


J-Rich:

PPG 21.8
RPG 5.4
APG 3.1
SPG 1.4
[b]TO's 2.02

BPG 0.7[/b]
FG% 0.441
FT% 0.752
3P% 0.406

MPG 38.4
PER: 18.4

TS% 55%

I don't see how it's Rashard really, the only thing he has going for him is his TS%, but I would bet J-Rich would get a nice boost playing next to Dwight Howard.

I think Rashard is one of the most underrated players on this board, but so is J-Rich, I like both of these guys.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
T-Spot
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2008

 

Post#18 » by T-Spot » Sun May 11, 2008 2:59 am

Cammo101 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Let JRich play next to Dwight and we will see how low that rebounding number goes. Shard would have a lot more rebounds playing in the no big man land of Charlotte. It seems like people are punishing Shard here for not being on a terrible team with no help. Shard has taken a backseat to Dwight and to some degree Hedo in order to win games. That does not mean he should be judged specifically on his numbers.

Like I said, the answer is easily Shard and pretty much any NBA GM would agree.


Errr...11 RPG, Okafor and 7 RPG, Nazr [in 24 MPG] says hello?
Image
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,848
And1: 2,010
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#19 » by Cammo101 » Sun May 11, 2008 5:26 am

T-Spot wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Errr...11 RPG, Okafor and 7 RPG, Nazr [in 24 MPG] says hello?


Like I said. No big men. These 2 guys play in different situations. JRich is the go to player offensively on a bad team, while Shard is part of an ensemble on a good team. This skews both players numbers in opposite directions. Then again, if you go by pure numbers then Zach Randolph is a top 15 player in the league.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,094
And1: 20,066
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#20 » by NO-KG-AI » Sun May 11, 2008 5:28 am

LOL, yea, that's nobodies as rebounders.

Playing on a bad team might increase numbers, but efficiency will drop as the first option.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"

Return to Player Comparisons