All-Rookie teams

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

All-Rookie teams 

Post#1 » by Liqourish » Tue May 13, 2008 9:33 pm

http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/52497/20080513/horford_and_durant_headline_all_rookie_team/


Kevin Durant of the Seattle SuperSonics and Al Horford of the Atlanta Hawks headline a talented group of rookies named to the 2007-08 T-Mobile NBA All-Rookie Team, the NBA announced today. Horford, the only player unanimously voted to the 2007-08 T-Mobile NBA All-Rookie Team, finished with 58. Durant, winner of the 2007-08 T-Mobile Rookie of the Year award, received a total of 57 votes.


Rounding out the T-Mobile NBA All-Rookie First Team are Houston
cdubbz
RealGM
Posts: 15,468
And1: 4,001
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: Oakland
 

 

Post#2 » by cdubbz » Tue May 13, 2008 9:49 pm

we can read it on the wiretap...
Kuya wrote: a good agent collects all the data, including quotes to give them leverage in contract deals.
User avatar
Atlanta Hawk Fan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,653
And1: 659
Joined: Jul 19, 2002

 

Post#3 » by Atlanta Hawk Fan » Tue May 13, 2008 10:02 pm

For the sake of commenting on the process, I do think there is an age limit that should apply to players being considered for ROY or All-Rookie teams.

Should Elton Brand be eligible for ROY if he plays in Italy next year? That is the equivalent of Luis Scola playing professionally in Europe and then being eligible for ROY at age 29 in the US.

The rookie awards are intended to recognize young, inexperienced players who excel, IMO. There should be an age limit to prevent veterans from being included when they simply choose to play professionally somewhere else before getting their payday in the NBA.

For next season, I would limit the age to something like 25 and use that going forward so that Hawks' "Rookie" David Anderson could not be eligible to make the All-Rookie team next season in the interests of keeping the award focused on the group of players who it should apply to.

Others may love guys like Ichiro or Scola being considered rookies but I don't.
Image
Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

 

Post#4 » by Liqourish » Tue May 13, 2008 10:05 pm

3 of the top "Rookies" were not from the 2007 draft class.

Has there ever been that many rookies not actually apart of the draft class included in the All-Rookie teams?
jefe
General Manager
Posts: 8,307
And1: 746
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Location: memphis

 

Post#5 » by jefe » Tue May 13, 2008 10:15 pm

Atlanta Hawk Fan wrote:For the sake of commenting on the process, I do think there is an age limit that should apply to players being considered for ROY or All-Rookie teams.

Should Elton Brand be eligible for ROY if he plays in Italy next year? That is the equivalent of Luis Scola playing professionally in Europe and then being eligible for ROY at age 29 in the US.

The rookie awards are intended to recognize young, inexperienced players who excel, IMO. There should be an age limit to prevent veterans from being included when they simply choose to play professionally somewhere else before getting their payday in the NBA.

For next season, I would limit the age to something like 25 and use that going forward so that Hawks' "Rookie" David Anderson could not be eligible to make the All-Rookie team next season in the interests of keeping the award focused on the group of players who it should apply to.

Others may love guys like Ichiro or Scola being considered rookies but I don't.


I understand what you're saying and it certainly has merit, but IMO rookie means rookie (i.e. first year playing in the league). But if you want to draw a bright line, why not say "rookie" means first year of playing the sport professionally (i.e. distinction from "amateur" NCAA play) regardless of league/age?
User avatar
may191988
Junior
Posts: 315
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2007

 

Post#6 » by may191988 » Tue May 13, 2008 10:34 pm

OMG Thad got absolutely robbed!!!!!!!! Jeff Green over THAD??!!!!!! No way. Thad was a main contributor in a playoff team with better numbers while Jeff gReen struggled to get minutes in the 2nd worst team in the league. THATS RIDICULOUS!!
LAKERS*CLIPPERS*BULLS
User avatar
Atlanta Hawk Fan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,653
And1: 659
Joined: Jul 19, 2002

 

Post#7 » by Atlanta Hawk Fan » Tue May 13, 2008 10:34 pm

jefe wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I understand what you're saying and it certainly has merit, but IMO rookie means rookie (i.e. first year playing in the league). But if you want to draw a bright line, why not say "rookie" means first year of playing the sport professionally (i.e. distinction from "amateur" NCAA play) regardless of league/age?


That distinction would work for me but would still cause some problems. It is the guys that have played professionally for years that come over and are judged against teenagers and young players that cause problems for me. Instituting a rookie/amateur definition would solve that issue. However, it would probably eliminate all Europeans and many other foreign players who play professionally at a very young age. Someone like Darko or Dirk would not be rookie eligible under that definition because they previously played professionally - even though they were very young when they started in the league.

It is a subject that reasonable minds would differ on. I still like a pure age limit best but maybe a hybrid rule would also work...something along the lines of making players under 24 rookie eligible per se and players over 24 rookie ineligible only if they have played professionally.
Image
User avatar
vi3t
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,193
And1: 1,443
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
 

 

Post#8 » by vi3t » Tue May 13, 2008 10:37 pm

may191988 wrote:OMG Thad got absolutely robbed!!!!!!!! Jeff Green over THAD??!!!!!! No way. Thad was a main contributor in a playoff team with better numbers while Jeff gReen struggled to get minutes in the 2nd worst team in the league. THATS RIDICULOUS!!

Moon deserved to be there over both
User avatar
Sixersftw
RealGM
Posts: 19,197
And1: 9,490
Joined: Dec 23, 2006
Location: Shoot a 3 you coward
       

 

Post#9 » by Sixersftw » Tue May 13, 2008 11:26 pm

vi3t wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Moon deserved to be there over both


if moon made it then i wouldn't think it was straight theft. i think raps & philly fans woulda would have been fine with either one making it over the other but jeff green?
They say an analytics man doesn't have a heart, but I ran the numbers and nothing can be further from the truth - Sam Hinkie probably
panacea
Veteran
Posts: 2,837
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 02, 2007

 

Post#10 » by panacea » Tue May 13, 2008 11:27 pm

I'm befuddled by the inclusion of Green. I didn't watch much of SEA but what I've seen of him was very unimpressive. Thad, and to a lesser extent, Moon were jobbed.
pr0wler
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,245
And1: 3,374
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
     

 

Post#11 » by pr0wler » Tue May 13, 2008 11:33 pm

Jeff Green owns. Quit hatin' you haters.
User avatar
T-Spot
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2008

 

Post#12 » by T-Spot » Wed May 14, 2008 12:29 am

Moon is gonna call his space friends and invade earth now. A key role player on a play-off team [and Thad] gets out voted by a lesser role-player on a lotto team. Its not like he put up better numbers or had superior talent either [making this a different situation than Durant vs Hortford].
Image
User avatar
Reks
Veteran
Posts: 2,507
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 30, 2007

 

Post#13 » by Reks » Wed May 14, 2008 12:34 am

its ok. Give the sonics a lot of love. They're still moving to Oklahoma city. So green robbed young and Oklahoma robs the seattle fans. Its fair and funny
menflavor
easily the worst realgm screen name
User avatar
T-Spot
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2008

 

Post#14 » by T-Spot » Wed May 14, 2008 1:03 am

Which Atlanta homer voted Durant for 2nd team anyway ? :lol:
Image
raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,301
And1: 620
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

 

Post#15 » by raleigh » Wed May 14, 2008 1:12 am

Which Atlanta homer voted Durant for 2nd team anyway ?


Al Horford is one bad man, that's all I'll say. :)
User avatar
yearsago
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,831
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Location: Puyallup, Wa
Contact:
         

 

Post#16 » by yearsago » Wed May 14, 2008 2:07 am

Wonder what the coach that decided to not include durant in his first team was smokin.
User avatar
yearsago
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,831
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Location: Puyallup, Wa
Contact:
         

 

Post#17 » by yearsago » Wed May 14, 2008 2:07 am

T-Spot wrote:Which Atlanta homer voted Durant for 2nd team anyway ? :lol:


Its a travesty that Durant got a 2nd team vote.
User avatar
may191988
Junior
Posts: 315
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2007

 

Post#18 » by may191988 » Wed May 14, 2008 8:18 am

oh yeah actually i hadnt noticed moon didnt make first team i forgot... yeah i think he and thad shouldve made it and leave out green and thornton too. thornton was spectacular at times but not a better body of work than moon. geez the teams this year are pretty pathetic...
LAKERS*CLIPPERS*BULLS
User avatar
Atlanta Hawk Fan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,653
And1: 659
Joined: Jul 19, 2002

 

Post#19 » by Atlanta Hawk Fan » Thu May 15, 2008 4:03 pm

yearsago wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Its a travesty that Durant got a 2nd team vote.


Agreed. He and Horford should both have been no-brainer unanimous picks.
Image
User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

 

Post#20 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Thu May 15, 2008 4:16 pm

I was hoping Nick Young would make the team but of course he was overlooked.

Return to The General Board