ATL / MIL

tbhawksfan · Post #1 » by **tbhawksfan** » Wed May 14, 2008 5:51 pm

Marv Williams / Bibby / 2010 first top 10 protect

for

Redd / Mo Williams / 2010 second

Atl gets the vets they need to continue their run and Mil gets a top young SF, a huge expiring and a first to continue their rebuild.

Mo / Acie / Speedy

Redd / Richardson / Mario

JJ / Chil

Smoove / Andersen / Jones

Horford / Zaza

killbuckner · Post #2 » by **killbuckner** » Wed May 14, 2008 6:37 pm

I don't think that the Bucks would come anywhere close to doing this

tontoz · Post #3 » by **tontoz** » Wed May 14, 2008 6:42 pm

Bucks fans seemed fairly agreeable to trading Redd for Marvin/Bibby. I don't know about Mo though.

killbuckner · Post #4 » by **killbuckner** » Wed May 14, 2008 6:59 pm

Honestly I think that fans probably value marvin more than GM's would at this point. Honestly if the Hawks were trying to trade Marvin for an expiring contract and a first rounder what do you think they could get?

evildallas · Post #5 » by **evildallas** » Wed May 14, 2008 7:11 pm

killbuckner wrote:Honestly I think that fans probably value marvin more than GM's would at this point. Honestly if the Hawks were trying to trade Marvin for an expiring contract and a first rounder what do you think they could get?

Late lottery or mid-first. I think Marvin still has some love around the league, but the fact that he's rookie deal is running out hurts his trade value.

The trade with Milwaukee depends on how much they want to cap freedom. I think they are regretting signing Mo Williams to the contract they did and are realizing that Redd isn't a cornerstone worthy of the max. We may be getting talent, but we'd be taking on some huge contracts at the same time.

Rip2137 · Post #6 » by **Rip2137** » Wed May 14, 2008 8:23 pm

Marvin has plenty of love around the league. Despite what fans around here think, Marvin averaging 15-6 as a 3rd-4th option on offense are not bad numbers.

He is still young and is showing signs of being a very good defender.

killbuckner · Post #7 » by **killbuckner** » Wed May 14, 2008 8:34 pm

dallas- thats what I think as well. I just have a feeling that many people here think he would be worth more than that. You are dead on when you say the amount of time left on his rookie contract is what drags down his value.

playa_lev · Post #8 » by **playa_lev** » Wed May 14, 2008 9:21 pm

killbuckner wrote:Honestly I think that fans probably value marvin more than GM's would at this point. Honestly if the Hawks were trying to trade Marvin for an expiring contract and a first rounder what do you think they could get?

Bibby + Marvin

for

Marbury + Lee + 2008 first rounder ??

conleyorbust · Post #9 » by **conleyorbust** » Wed May 14, 2008 9:44 pm

playa_lev wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Bibby + Marvin

for

Marbury + Lee + 2008 first rounder ?? :)

whew, that would be a high first huh? we could swing Lee to a team that could use him like the Raps for A. Parker and their pick if we wanted.

of course Marbury can make Rider look like a guidance counsellor and we would be taking on too much salary.

raleigh · Post #10 » by **raleigh** » Thu May 15, 2008 12:22 am

Rip2137 wrote:Marvin has plenty of love around the league. Despite what fans around here think, Marvin averaging 15-6 as a 3rd-4th option on offense are not bad numbers.

He is still young and is showing signs of being a very good defender.

Heretic! You're supposed to undervalue the Hawks!

M301E814W404 · Post #11 » by **M301E814W404** » Thu May 15, 2008 5:37 pm

I like the Redd deal, but the would make us even smaller than we already ar if we move JJ to the 3

tontoz · Post #12 » by **tontoz** » Thu May 15, 2008 5:49 pm

M301E814W404 wrote:I like the Redd deal, but the would make us even smaller than we already ar if we move JJ to the 3

We are only undersized at the 4/5.