The "We lost because of refs" Myth
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
The "We lost because of refs" Myth
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 153
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 10, 2008
The "We lost because of refs" Myth
Every true fan's perspective is usually biased on calls. For years this myth has been the #1 excuse that every losing team provides. I dont know about you guys, but i'm tired of it.
The facts are,
1. Maybe the other team took the ball to the basket, pounded the paint, more than your team.
2. Maybe the opposing team played with just slightly more intensity at home rather than an away game.
3. If the refs make a bad call on one end, eventually they will make a bad call on the other end. Things usually even out. But fans only notice bad calls against them, not ones they commit.
4. Star treatment exists to a certain extent, but without stars you have no business being in finals. They are faster, more athletic, and some develop the skill of getting a call.
5. Getting a call is a skill, from the pump fake, to driving the lane and flailing your arms.
6. Close games are not decided by 1 bad call, every play in 4th quarter does.
7. The better team wins 99% of the time, with few exceptions.
I hate this "Refs cost us the game" excuse. I would love for at least the RealGM posters, who are very inteligent people, to erradicate it. Instead try to find the true reason your team lost and ways to correct/improve your team.
The facts are,
1. Maybe the other team took the ball to the basket, pounded the paint, more than your team.
2. Maybe the opposing team played with just slightly more intensity at home rather than an away game.
3. If the refs make a bad call on one end, eventually they will make a bad call on the other end. Things usually even out. But fans only notice bad calls against them, not ones they commit.
4. Star treatment exists to a certain extent, but without stars you have no business being in finals. They are faster, more athletic, and some develop the skill of getting a call.
5. Getting a call is a skill, from the pump fake, to driving the lane and flailing your arms.
6. Close games are not decided by 1 bad call, every play in 4th quarter does.
7. The better team wins 99% of the time, with few exceptions.
I hate this "Refs cost us the game" excuse. I would love for at least the RealGM posters, who are very inteligent people, to erradicate it. Instead try to find the true reason your team lost and ways to correct/improve your team.
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,119
- And1: 20,135
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,757
- And1: 7,214
- Joined: Jul 08, 2006
-
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,778
- And1: 21
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
- Location: Rest In Peace Dad
- Contact:
-
may191988 wrote:oh geez try tellin this to utah fans...
In all fairness, They were screwed by the refs in the 4th quarter, but then again all referees make mistakes, it is part of the game.
pillwenney wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.
Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.

-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,822
- And1: 460
- Joined: Oct 20, 2004
-
I think some fans complain and blame the refs too much and some people like you, are still living in the past and don't want to believe that the refs are a problem now more than ever OR could be a BIG problem and affecting games. Like Roscoe said...it's all rigged. BELIEVE IT.
Also, the league could easily change some of these stupid rules that allow the tim donaghy's to exist and go undetected.
So no, I don't think it's as simple as you say, Mr. Stern.
Also, the league could easily change some of these stupid rules that allow the tim donaghy's to exist and go undetected.
So no, I don't think it's as simple as you say, Mr. Stern.

Re: The "We lost because of refs" Myth
- cwas2882
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,832
- And1: 5,895
- Joined: Jun 01, 2004
-
Re: The "We lost because of refs" Myth
nightstarstolen wrote:
7. The better team wins 99% of the time, with few exceptions.
That's silly.
Re: The "We lost because of refs" Myth
- Point forward
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,200
- And1: 285
- Joined: May 16, 2007
- Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D
Re: The "We lost because of refs" Myth
nightstarstolen wrote:3. If the refs make a bad call on one end, eventually they will make a bad call on the other end. Things usually even out. But fans only notice bad calls against them, not ones they commit.
7. The better team wins 99% of the time, with few exceptions.
Sorry, but those 2 points are not true...
- Point forward
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,200
- And1: 285
- Joined: May 16, 2007
- Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D
kandiking wrote:*myth only applies to NY,BOS,CHI,SA,LAL. offer not valid to all other teams and all teams below .500. for more information contact david stern



There was this one ECF Finals game 1987 where Robert Parish just DECKED Bill Laimbeer. He hit him square in the chin, not the slightest doubt that that punch was intentional. Result: NOTHING. As a Celtics fan, I did not mind at all!

-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,056
- And1: 19
- Joined: Mar 16, 2005
- Location: Brazil
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
I'll add two more:
1. You don't get the same calls on the road that you do at home, certainly not in the playoffs.
2. It's a hell of a lot harder to see things at floor level with everyone moving and heading in/out of your line of vision than it is to see them from above, where you are focusing on the ball and/or one player and can see everything clearly.
1. You don't get the same calls on the road that you do at home, certainly not in the playoffs.
2. It's a hell of a lot harder to see things at floor level with everyone moving and heading in/out of your line of vision than it is to see them from above, where you are focusing on the ball and/or one player and can see everything clearly.
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game
- JellosJigglin
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,522
- And1: 9,555
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Icness wrote:I'll add two more:
1. You don't get the same calls on the road that you do at home, certainly not in the playoffs.
2. It's a hell of a lot harder to see things at floor level with everyone moving and heading in/out of your line of vision than it is to see them from above, where you are focusing on the ball and/or one player and can see everything clearly.
That's the truth. But then don't the referees have some responsibility on the outcome of the game? If a call at home isn't the same call on the road, then there is inconsistency in the officiating.
I can see why the Jazz have the best home record, even though they're not viewed as a championship contender. Their crowds can be vulgar and abusive. And the architecture of the building is arranged so that the crowd is over the court and sound can't escape. I think officials get intimidated by the crowd in that building. So that definitely favors the home team.
Same thing can be applied to other teams as well, regarding the home crowd swaying the officiating. Although I haven't heard of any crowds being openly racist (GS series) or making fun of a child with cancer (LA series).
- Nate505
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,755
- And1: 13,571
- Joined: Oct 29, 2001
- Location: Denver, CO
-
JellosJigglin wrote:Same thing can be applied to other teams as well, regarding the home crowd swaying the officiating. Although I haven't heard of any crowds being openly racist (GS series) or making fun of a child with cancer (LA series).
Yeah, it's wonderful when people actually believe accusations without any proof.