Who is the NBA's biggest Parasite?
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Who is the NBA's biggest Parasite?
-
- On Leave
- Posts: 42,148
- And1: 9,859
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Who is the NBA's biggest Parasite?
Honestly, is there a player who is more dependent on another player like Chandler is to Paul? Chandler has always been an amazing rebounder but has always left alot to be desired on the offensive end, but with Paul, he must always be accounted for on the offense.
-
- On Leave
- Posts: 42,148
- And1: 9,859
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Anticon wrote:The term parasite means someone who drains someone else without giving anything back.
So your usage doesn't make any sense. I agree that he needs Paul for his offense, but that doesn't make him a parasite.
Didn't mean to jump on you - it just initially looked like an insult.
I made it pretty clear what I meant in the original post if you bothered to read it.
-
- On Leave
- Posts: 42,148
- And1: 9,859
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
G35 wrote:Let's look at it like this. Replace Chandler with Kwame Brown. Then see if it takes something on Chandlers end to complete all those alley oops.
Paul can't just do that with anyone out there.....
I think would actually be productive on the offensive end... but not to the degree as Chandler.
I actually had a thread not too long ago if having good hands is a skill or something that can be developed. No one really had an answer to that question.
- eatyourchildren
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,501
- And1: 11
- Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Blame Rasho wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I think would actually be productive on the offensive end... but not to the degree as Chandler.
I actually had a thread not too long ago if having good hands is a skill or something that can be developed. No one really had an answer to that question.
Kwame can't catch passes on the move, so...
ugkfan2681" wrote: wrote: i dont take **** lightly im from the land of the trill home of the rockets RESPECT OK.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 27,575
- And1: 2,141
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Baltimore, MD
-
This is going to sound odd, even blasphemous, but I think a lot of Tony Parker's success comes from Tim Duncan. Without Duncan, his offensive effectiveness would be minimal, as his penetrating game would be taken away, leaving jumpshots that he can't hit consistently. He's not a great passer, nor is he an exceptional defender (though he's either average or above average in both categories), so I don't think he'd get All-Star consideration, let alone actually making the team.
However, I guess you could say that about a lot of players who play alongside a dominant big man.
So basically, this post is worthless.

However, I guess you could say that about a lot of players who play alongside a dominant big man.
So basically, this post is worthless.
