ImageImageImage

slate.com: Good C's article on homecourt advantage

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Gant
RealGM
Posts: 10,861
And1: 14,963
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

slate.com: Good C's article on homecourt advantage 

Post#1 » by Gant » Fri May 16, 2008 4:31 pm

Personally I recoil from all the non-basketball crap: celebrities, mascots, T shirt guns, cheerleaders, in-game entertainment, non-organ produced music, pyrotechnics, and anything else introduced to an arena after approximately 1958.

It makes money? Good for someone. All I want is basketball. Everything else is a distraction.

Nice long article here:

http://www.slate.com/id/2191488/pagenum/all/#page_start
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#2 » by Athanacropolis » Fri May 16, 2008 5:48 pm

Great read Gant, thanks for the link! I've often wondered about why teams play better at home, and this author gave a pretty interesting breakdown about the various theories.

Still, when it comes to KG, it's all about the crowd!
User avatar
Datruth345
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,903
And1: 442
Joined: Nov 25, 2005
 

 

Post#3 » by Datruth345 » Fri May 16, 2008 7:48 pm

anyone notice the celtics don't play music when the actual game is going on like every other arena does

i dont understand how david stern let that crap started...how can you play music as the game is in progress?!?!?!

it irks me to no end
"...That, Mr. James, is etched in stone.” - Bill Russell

Return to Boston Celtics