ImageImageImageImageImage

If we decide to blow it up, this is the best deal...

Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair

Bimbo_Coles
Pro Prospect
Posts: 920
And1: 26
Joined: Jun 18, 2001

 

Post#21 » by Bimbo_Coles » Fri May 16, 2008 12:15 am

marthafokker wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



The point is... status quo. If we are out of playoff with the original Baron/Monta combo, how is having this status quo make us BETTER? I think that is what we are trying to get across.


If there was a reason that we didn't make the playoffs, it was certainly not because of our starting backcourt.
User avatar
GSWhoopfan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,508
And1: 67
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

 

Post#22 » by GSWhoopfan » Fri May 16, 2008 12:19 am

marthafokker wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I agree. Just look at Chicago and see what happened.


Hinrich isnt undersized. Ben Gordon was one of the only bright spots for the bulls...

that...and getting rid of Ben Wallace
Lets Go Baron Davis...i dont care what jersey you put on. Lets go.
Big Smooth is focused and ready to handle the centers of the league.
Curry and Ellis will be a top 5 back court this season. 6/25/2010
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#23 » by FNQ » Fri May 16, 2008 1:54 am

marthafokker wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I agree. Just look at Chicago and see what happened.


Dear Lord... Unfortuntately Bimbo (btw, great reference :D) the draftpicks became part of the scenario here.

Eric Gordon is 6'4 220... Ben Gordon was 6'3 190 coming into the league. Eric is an athletic specimen, and Ben was pretty average...

More concerning is the Batum and Lopez picks.... the underachiever that still can't shoot well and then an energy big who's slow as hell... I mean we have Kosta already, we dont need to corner the market with slow stiffs.

If the deal can be swung, I'd like to go:

Love / Rush / Ibaka and take a offensive rebounder in the 2nd.... then I'd love this deal :nod:
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,353
And1: 7,111
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

 

Post#24 » by giberish » Fri May 16, 2008 3:00 am

marthafokker wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



The point is... status quo. If we are out of playoff with the original Baron/Monta combo, how is having this status quo make us BETTER? I think that is what we are trying to get across.


The plan is to add a young player (Mayo or perhaps Gordon) who would be able to keep the backcourt playing at the level it did last year for the next 5-10 years (realistcally there would be a dropoff for a 1-3 years while the rookie developed an NBA game even in the best scenario).

During that time the young front court players (Beans, Wright, #14, ...) improve so the team becomes better overall. As opposed to having Baron in decline while the young bigs improve so the team stays decent but never improves overall.
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#25 » by Sid the Squid » Fri May 16, 2008 3:24 am

Keep Baron and pay him the max till he's 44 >>>>> drafting OJ Mayo
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

 

Post#26 » by old rem » Fri May 16, 2008 8:35 am

510Reggae wrote:Great deal, horrible picks (outside of EG)...


Batum and R.Lopez is a great way to piss away the picks we've just earned.


Yeah.

Gordon can be quite good-if a somewhat small SG. He won't be that good right away. Few guys go from freshman to instant NBA success. He may need a full season to just = Azu.

Batum? A young unseen Euro? What second hand info I have says talented but not that focused or consistant. Who can even tell me what his scoring/reb/asst numbers were the past season or two? Suppose he's just a low energy Pietrus?

Robin Lopez REALLY needed another year in school to find SOME offensive game. As is, think Foyle but not quite as quick. We'd be nuts to take him with much better bigs still available.
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

 

Post#27 » by old rem » Fri May 16, 2008 8:59 am

Sid the Squid wrote:Keep Baron and pay him the max till he's 44 >>>>> drafting OJ Mayo



Let's hear it for the King Of Cynics :clap: :clap:

Mayo won 3 high school state championships in 2 different states,spent summers playing the best high school AAU stars-since he was a soph,scored 20+ as a freshman in the pac 10. Can play PG or SG. Not too shabby.

Mostly....this is NOT a draft where you want mid round picks,and I'm not that keen on even most of the alleged top 10. Outside of Beasley...it's like the next 8 guys are MISSING then at #10 you resume with Rose,B Lopez,Love etc.
CENSORED... No comment.
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

 

Post#28 » by jgustav1 » Sat May 17, 2008 5:04 pm

Subaculta wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Clips get a hometown draw, who will do one of two things for them... either (along with Brand, Kaman, Mobley and Thornton) get them into the playoffs, or (and Sterling would like this) come off the books next year and a massive expiring.


If the Clippers trade Maggette, it will be in a package for Calderon, Baron Davis and Mike Dunleavy cannot co-exist. No way would he allow Davis to jackup 500+ 3 point attempts in a season.
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#29 » by Sid the Squid » Sat May 17, 2008 6:47 pm

Dunleavy's going to coach who they give him..He's got 1 coaching option...The clips...Sr.'s living on the edge with his NBA coaching career.
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

 

Post#30 » by jgustav1 » Sun May 18, 2008 12:48 am

Sid the Squid wrote:Dunleavy's going to coach who they give him..He's got 1 coaching option...The clips...Sr.'s living on the edge with his NBA coaching career.


You don't know the Clippers that well. Dunvleavy controls most player personnel decisions with the Clippers and has much more say in the draft and free agency than Elgin Baylor. He was the fool behind the drafting of Yaroslav Korolev.
User avatar
Dark Star
Pro Prospect
Posts: 894
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Location: Margaritaville

 

Post#31 » by Dark Star » Sun May 18, 2008 2:55 am

RUSH AND ELLIS = GOOD THINGS
oaktown_refugee wrote:lol @ Cheney as "shooting" guard...
-bob-
RealGM
Posts: 19,991
And1: 41
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
       

 

Post#32 » by -bob- » Sun May 18, 2008 3:04 am

Baron to LAC makes all the sense in the world. Its LA, they are built to be a win-now team, Brand is 29, Maggette is 28, Kaman is 26, Thornton turns 25 soon. It makes no sense for them to draft a 18 or 19 year old PG.
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#33 » by Sid the Squid » Sun May 18, 2008 3:46 am

jgustav1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



You don't know the Clippers that well. Dunvleavy controls most player personnel decisions with the Clippers and has much more say in the draft and free agency than Elgin Baylor. He was the fool behind the drafting of Yaroslav Korolev.
How could you have Brand at 29 and want Calderon > Baron BoomDizzle Davis ? That's insane.
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 41,240
And1: 9,618
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

 

Post#34 » by Mylie10 » Sun May 18, 2008 3:54 am

-bob- wrote:Baron to LAC makes all the sense in the world. Its LA, they are built to be a win-now team, Brand is 29, Maggette is 28, Kaman is 26, Thornton turns 25 soon. It makes no sense for them to draft a 18 or 19 year old PG.


good point BOB.

They've got to firgure out right away if Livingston is healed from that nasty tweak. If he is then maybe they look to bring in a nice back-up type. If they're not confident in him coming back then they will need a starter big time.

their most important needs are Elton Brand and a PG. Success this coming year will have alot to do in whether or not Elton re-signs there.

So yeah I could see interest coming from this direction (Clips). Not sure if the Warriors value Maggette and Livingston enough. I know they wouldn't mind the number 6.

Personally I've seen alot worse trades around here. If Livingston can get back to where he was pre-injury, and Maggette for a one year trial, and possibly getting Love out of the deal, then yeah.

Baron (no number 14) for Mags, Livingston, number 6
Khoee wrote “
Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

 

Post#35 » by jgustav1 » Sun May 18, 2008 4:38 am

Sid the Squid wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

How could you have Brand at 29 and want Calderon > Baron BoomDizzle Davis ? That's insane.


I want a PG who has a good assist/turnover ratio and hits over 40% of his threes. I don't want a guy like Davis jacking up 500+ 3 point attempts and hitting 1/3 of them.

The Clippers would be much more interested in Arenas than Davis, although it is unlikely that Arenas will opt out.
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#36 » by Sid the Squid » Sun May 18, 2008 5:04 am

Ive never realized Baron had a bad ass/to ratio..You are a wealth of knowledge..Thanks for the info..
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

 

Post#37 » by jgustav1 » Sun May 18, 2008 5:20 am

Sid the Squid wrote:Ive never realized Baron had a bad ass/to ratio..You are a wealth of knowledge..Thanks for the info..


Sorry dude, Calderon's assist/turnover ratio is 4/1, this is much better than Baron.
Sid the Squid
Banned User
Posts: 26,062
And1: 9
Joined: Sep 16, 2005

 

Post#38 » by Sid the Squid » Sun May 18, 2008 5:52 am

jgustav1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Sorry dude, Calderon's assist/turnover ratio is 4/1, this is much better than Baron.
Have you always been a wizard at math?
jgustav1
Analyst
Posts: 3,367
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 29, 2003

 

Post#39 » by jgustav1 » Sun May 18, 2008 3:30 pm

No wonder you have 14,000 posts with crap like this.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#40 » by FNQ » Sun May 18, 2008 6:10 pm

jgustav1 wrote:The Clippers would be much more interested in Arenas than Davis, although it is unlikely that Arenas will opt out.



Yeeouch.

Let the record show the Clippers fan wanted the less passing, just as chuck happy, and nearly as defenseless Arenas, coming off knee problems and being shut down in the middle of the Wizards playoff run, than Baron Davis.

The Clips SHOULD be after Jason Kidd instead and going after a young PG... they need ball movement, and not the kind Calderon brings where people stay on the perimeter and wait for a kick... they need in traffic, get the ball to Kaman/Brand quickly and keep the ball out of Al Thornton's hands type PGing... the more Al Thornton dribbles, the more the NBA dies a little inside..

Calderon in truth would be a terrible fit.. he's found a niche in Toronto with the other foreign kids who play a similar style (that now Bosh is learning to play)... it seems Colangelo wanted some fame for his own type of gimmick, the Eurogimmick... but if Livingston was healthy and playing 20 per game, then Calderon makes sense for the Clips... otherwise its just mixing and matching boxscores.

Return to Golden State Warriors