~OhMyBosh~ wrote:well which is it, suck or blow?
swallows. HA!
? bout mark jackson the analyst
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
-
studcrackers
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 52,226
- And1: 6,100
- Joined: Oct 31, 2004
- Location: Getting hit in the head
-
-
njnetsballaaa
- Sophomore
- Posts: 134
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 21, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
NUNBETTA wrote:No, his commentary sounds much more like the pre-recorded analysis you'd hear in a basketball interview. He doesn't sound like he's giving a spontaneous opinion/piece of analysis based on what he's seeing on the court; he's cliche, and a little bit robotic. Notice, he hardly ever varies the rhythm of his speech. In one way, it's a good thing because it means he's concise, but in another way, it's just boring.
He also states the obvious far too often.
I agree, I was smh @ the fact that some Nets fans wanted to replace Lawrence Frank with him. He's funny though, I like his "You're Better Than That!" segments.