What is difference between elite and top tier SG?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Hood President
Senior
Posts: 504
And1: 19
Joined: Oct 01, 2007

What is difference between elite and top tier SG? 

Post#1 » by Hood President » Thu May 29, 2008 12:29 am

what is the difference between elite and top tier? i chose the SG postion because...i just felt like it.

a elite shooting guard to me is someone who averages 20 points and getting his teammates involved and not being selfish while being double team nightly. elite does not mean you have to have a long impresive resime.....if your not doubled 90% percent of the games then your not elite.

top tier is someone who has "body of work" and has a long impressive resime with hardly any flaws like kobe(maybe wade)

for example: joe johnson is elite SG right? yes. is he top tier? not even close. hes not even on the same universe as kobe BUT he is elite.

kobe
Tmac
Johnson
Ai
Carter
Wade
Arenas

all these SG in my opinion are elite but not all are top tier with the exception of kobe(maybe wade). and i dont like carter or ai that much. but they are elite

if you disagree with me then go ahead bring the meat.

whats your definition of both?
Twitter.com/Hood_President Follow Me!!!!!
User avatar
T-Spot
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2008

 

Post#2 » by T-Spot » Thu May 29, 2008 12:46 am

First name has to be Kobe.
Image
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

 

Post#3 » by TMACFORMVP » Thu May 29, 2008 1:11 am

It's probably a SG that can dominate both ends of the floor both offensively and defensively but also contribute in other facets of the game if their shot is not falling. Some one that can just control the flow of the game at all times.

Impact on the game is always greater than the stats IMO.
User avatar
CB4MiamiHeat
General Manager
Posts: 8,694
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 13, 2004

 

Post#4 » by CB4MiamiHeat » Thu May 29, 2008 1:52 am

Kobe, Wade, Tmac...maybe AI
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#5 » by dockingsched » Thu May 29, 2008 1:58 am

maybe ai? definitely not ai

u let ai in, u let a lot of people in.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,570
And1: 4,199
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

 

Post#6 » by CBS7 » Thu May 29, 2008 2:32 am

Shoot, get to the line, create for others, and defend at least decently.
User avatar
SportsFan215
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,992
And1: 60
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#7 » by SportsFan215 » Thu May 29, 2008 2:49 am

I think you might have to put Joe Johnson in that group now.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#8 » by kooldude » Thu May 29, 2008 2:59 am

Kobe and Wade.

I have Manu almost close to elite, but at very good.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
The_Believer
Pro Prospect
Posts: 810
And1: 0
Joined: May 20, 2007
Location: The Bay

 

Post#9 » by The_Believer » Thu May 29, 2008 2:59 am

^^^ No, 1 quarter doen't make you elite. If so, Monta is due to his 1 month stretch, which is much longer than a quarter/a series. Although, JJ has impressed me a lot from his performance vs. BOS.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#10 » by dockingsched » Thu May 29, 2008 3:00 am

SportsFan215 wrote:I think you might have to put Joe Johnson in that group now.


not a chance he's on the same level as kobe, wade, tmac.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
AIfan3
Head Coach
Posts: 6,561
And1: 3,816
Joined: Mar 21, 2005
Location: Searching for AI's mojo..

Re: What is a elite SG? 

Post#11 » by AIfan3 » Thu May 29, 2008 3:39 am

Hood President wrote:what qualifies a SG as elite. do he have to atleast average 20 points per game. the reason i bring this up because lots of folks say ginobili is not a elite SG(and i agree). what bench benchmark do a SG have to reach to be considered elite.

please explain.


Basically a SG that's head and heels over most other SG's in the league.. Meaning top 5.

Kobe, T-mac ( Is he really a SG?), Wade, AI (hate all you want), VC
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#12 » by dockingsched » Thu May 29, 2008 4:11 am

elite means that you are at the very top level. ai and vince carter are clearly not on the same level as kobe, tmac, and wade. tmac might not even be on that level.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#13 » by JoshB914 » Thu May 29, 2008 4:42 am

TMac is not on the same level as Wade, he's not in the same universe as Kobe.
User avatar
Baller 24
RealGM
Posts: 16,637
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 11, 2006

 

Post#14 » by Baller 24 » Thu May 29, 2008 2:47 pm

JoshB914 wrote:TMac is not on the same level as Wade, he's not in the same universe as Kobe.


Before his shoulder injury and shooting percentages dropped the last month of the year, he would of been. Kobe is on a whole different level than Wade, but it can be argued that McGrady and Wade can be on the same level. McGrady turns the ball over very less, and is a better play maker then any of those guys listed. His defense is decent, nothing to great, but its not bad at all, probably behind Wade in that department, but obviously McGrady also has height advantage (his wingspan is close to 6'11). And obviously in his worst NBA season he makes the all NBA third team, and gets top 10 in MVP voting, while also leading his team to 50+win season without Yao, twice. He is probably up their, but not nearly on the same level as Kobe. I don't think anyone is right now in the shooting guard department. If anything it goes like this:
Kobe












Wade
Tmac



AI
Vince
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
UDRIH14
General Manager
Posts: 7,757
And1: 665
Joined: Jan 27, 2005
Location: Australia

 

Post#15 » by UDRIH14 » Thu May 29, 2008 3:22 pm

lol at JJ being elite class

manu torches him every h2h
AJ:"I'm Western Conference," he said. "I'm Popovich. I'm for him, for Texas and for the Spurs."
Malinhion
Banned User
Posts: 10,071
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Holding a Players-Only Meeting

 

Post#16 » by Malinhion » Thu May 29, 2008 4:22 pm

TarMac isn't on the same level as Wade. He's not even past AI. I don't know why people are so quick to put AI below McGrady when Iverson has had better numbers for a longer time, and has more career accolades and general success.

It's silly to do this for just shooting guards, though. Just include all swingmen and combo guards. The distinction will flesh out more clearly. Here is my list (in order after this season):

Top Tier (Elite): Kobe (1), LeBron (2), Wade (3)
2nd Tier (Elite): Iverson (4), Carmelo (5), McGrady (6), Carter (7), Pierce (8), Johnson (9), Arenas (10)
3rd Tier: Ginobili (11), Butler (12), Allen (13), Hamilton (14), Iguodala (15), Roy (16), Martin (17), Redd (18)
4th Tier: Maggette (19), Richardson (20), Gordon (21), Ellis (22), McCants (23), Mobley (24), Davis (25)

An elite player generally outclasses the rest of the competition on the floor on a nighty basis. An elite player clearly takes his team to the next level, and has demonstrated the ability to do so in the postseason. 3rd tier are great players who aren't ideal 1st options on a championship squad, but would probably make great complements to a franchise player. 4th tier and below are merely cogs in a machine.
ambiglight
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,367
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 03, 2007

 

Post#17 » by ambiglight » Thu May 29, 2008 4:26 pm

Elite is just comprised of the best off guards in the league regardless of what their specialty may be. Lots of guys qualify in that case.
Top Tier is comprised of the group of off guards overall with regards to shooting, playing off the ball, passing, scoring, defense and decision-making.

The top tier has AI, Kobe, Manu, Vince, and McGrady. The only one that has distinguished himself from the others clearly is Kobe and some of that may be due to having the good fortune to play with a great organization that is well managed and committed to putting a winning product on the floor. AI, Manu, Vince, and McGrady are all elite transcendent players with extensive individual resumes but have one flaw or another that has kept them from demanding universal respect. In truth, the off guard position is not a make or break position. So its very easy to be a top tier shooting guard yet not be a championship player. As such I think folks are overly critical of the AIs, Carters, and McGradys. As much as kobe is loved he's still very much in the same top tier as those other players individually.
ambiglight
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,367
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 03, 2007

 

Post#18 » by ambiglight » Thu May 29, 2008 4:30 pm

Malinhion wrote:TarMac isn't on the same level as Wade. He's not even past AI. I don't know why people are so quick to put AI below McGrady when Iverson has had better numbers for a longer time, and has more career accolades and general success.

It's silly to do this for just shooting guards, though. Just include all swingmen and combo guards. The distinction will flesh out more clearly. Here is my list (in order after this season):

Top Tier (Elite): Kobe (1), LeBron (2), Wade (3)
2nd Tier (Elite): Iverson (4), Carmelo (5), McGrady (6), Carter (7), Pierce (8), Johnson (9), Arenas (10)
3rd Tier: Ginobili (11), Butler (12), Allen (13), Hamilton (14), Iguodala (15), Roy (16), Martin (17), Redd (18)
4th Tier: Maggette (19), Richardson (20), Gordon (21), Ellis (22), McCants (23), Mobley (24), Davis (25)

An elite player generally outclasses the rest of the competition on the floor on a nighty basis. An elite player clearly takes his team to the next level, and has demonstrated the ability to do so in the postseason. 3rd tier are great players who aren't ideal 1st options on a championship squad, but would probably make great complements to a franchise player. 4th tier and below are merely cogs in a machine.

are u sure wade "outclasses" the rest of the competition on a regular basis? durability should factor into this as well. i do like your tier system for the most part though
Malinhion
Banned User
Posts: 10,071
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Holding a Players-Only Meeting

 

Post#19 » by Malinhion » Thu May 29, 2008 4:38 pm

ambiglight wrote:are u sure wade "outclasses" the rest of the competition on a regular basis? durability should factor into this as well. i do like your tier system for the most part though


Yes.

Image
User avatar
Baller 24
RealGM
Posts: 16,637
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 11, 2006

 

Post#20 » by Baller 24 » Thu May 29, 2008 4:48 pm

Malinhion wrote:TarMac isn't on the same level as Wade. He's not even past AI. I don't know why people are so quick to put AI below McGrady when Iverson has had better numbers for a longer time, and has more career accolades and general success.

It's silly to do this for just shooting guards, though. Just include all swingmen and combo guards. The distinction will flesh out more clearly. Here is my list (in order after this season):

Top Tier (Elite): Kobe (1), LeBron (2), Wade (3)
2nd Tier (Elite): Iverson (4), Carmelo (5), McGrady (6), Carter (7), Pierce (8), Johnson (9), Arenas (10)
3rd Tier: Ginobili (11), Butler (12), Allen (13), Hamilton (14), Iguodala (15), Roy (16), Martin (17), Redd (18)
4th Tier: Maggette (19), Richardson (20), Gordon (21), Ellis (22), McCants (23), Mobley (24), Davis (25)

An elite player generally outclasses the rest of the competition on the floor on a nighty basis. An elite player clearly takes his team to the next level, and has demonstrated the ability to do so in the postseason. 3rd tier are great players who aren't ideal 1st options on a championship squad, but would probably make great complements to a franchise player. 4th tier and below are merely cogs in a machine.


I can also see Wade and Kobe elite yes, Tmac 2nd tier makes sense, I can understand AI going ahead of Tmac because of his statistics, but Melo? I think thats pushing it, Melo isn't even a SG, or has led his team to any success, if anything Denver is playing better with AI then Melo, from what I've seen based on statistics, but obviously the Nuggets aren't going to move Melo over AI due to his age. But aside from the stats Melo puts up, he still has an inability to win with AI.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark

Return to Player Comparisons