What is difference between elite and top tier SG?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Malinhion
Banned User
Posts: 10,071
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Holding a Players-Only Meeting

 

Post#21 » by Malinhion » Thu May 29, 2008 5:23 pm

Baller 24 wrote:I can also see Wade and Kobe elite yes, Tmac 2nd tier makes sense, I can understand AI going ahead of Tmac because of his statistics, but Melo? I think thats pushing it, Melo isn't even a SG, or has led his team to any success, if anything Denver is playing better with AI then Melo, from what I've seen based on statistics, but obviously the Nuggets aren't going to move Melo over AI due to his age. But aside from the stats Melo puts up, he still has an inability to win with AI.


Melo took them to the playoffs as a rookie and they haven't missed it since. Adding AI hasn't pushed them any further into the postseason. I don't see how you give Iverson the credit over Melo, here. It's clear that Iverson's stats went up playing with Melo, whereas Melo's numbers haven't increased that much. What increase there was is due to his evolution as a player, not help from Iverson.
Hood President
Senior
Posts: 504
And1: 19
Joined: Oct 01, 2007

 

Post#22 » by Hood President » Thu May 29, 2008 5:35 pm

UDRIH14 wrote:lol at JJ being elite class

manu torches him every h2h


sure he would, he would burn jj
Twitter.com/Hood_President Follow Me!!!!!
User avatar
Baller 24
RealGM
Posts: 16,637
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 11, 2006

 

Post#23 » by Baller 24 » Thu May 29, 2008 5:36 pm

Malinhion wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Melo took them to the playoffs as a rookie and they haven't missed it since. Adding AI hasn't pushed them any further into the postseason. I don't see how you give Iverson the credit over Melo, here. It's clear that Iverson's stats went up playing with Melo, whereas Melo's numbers haven't increased that much. What increase there was is due to his evolution as a player, not help from Iverson.


That Nuggets team was missing one thing on their team in 2003, and that was scoring. Melo came onto a team that had a starting lineup of Miller, Lenard, Melo, Nene, Camby, pretty damn all around team if you ask me. He came in and did what he had to do, and that was score points.

Now the reason I say the Nuggets win more and are a better team with AI then Melo:
Iverson's win shares with the Nuggets: 33 to only 15 loses, while his offensive win share was up to 24.7.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... sal01.html
Melo's win shares with the Nuggets: 24 and 19 loses, while his offensive win share production was 14.5.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... oca01.html

Melos best season as an all around player was 2006, and he played terrific, while even helping his team, his turnovers were lower, and his win shares were a career best. Playing with AI has made all that disappear and he has since turned into hurting his team as much as helping them. But the reason I say the Nuggets are better with AI, is because of his win production, he gives you a solid all around player compared to Melo. If there is a player the Nuggets want to keep, its AI, not Melo. It also shows when Melo has been mentioned in many rumors.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
The_Believer
Pro Prospect
Posts: 810
And1: 0
Joined: May 20, 2007
Location: The Bay

 

Post#24 » by The_Believer » Thu May 29, 2008 6:02 pm

Malinhion wrote:TarMac isn't on the same level as Wade. He's not even past AI. I don't know why people are so quick to put AI below McGrady when Iverson has had better numbers for a longer time, and has more career accolades and general success.

It's silly to do this for just shooting guards, though. Just include all swingmen and combo guards. The distinction will flesh out more clearly. Here is my list (in order after this season):

Top Tier (Elite): Kobe (1), LeBron (2), Wade (3)
2nd Tier (Elite): Iverson (4), Carmelo (5), McGrady (6), Carter (7), Pierce (8), Johnson (9), Arenas (10)
3rd Tier: Ginobili (11), Butler (12), Allen (13), Hamilton (14), Iguodala (15), Roy (16), Martin (17), Redd (18)
4th Tier: Maggette (19), Richardson (20), Gordon (21), Ellis (22), McCants (23), Mobley (24), Davis (25)

An elite player generally outclasses the rest of the competition on the floor on a nighty basis. An elite player clearly takes his team to the next level, and has demonstrated the ability to do so in the postseason. 3rd tier are great players who aren't ideal 1st options on a championship squad, but would probably make great complements to a franchise player. 4th tier and below are merely cogs in a machine.


You have Monta below Iggy, Redd, Maggz, Rich, and Gordon?!?!

:rofl: That's just laughable. Monta was putting up this season's numbers in his first year as a full-time starter in his third year out of high school, accomplishing several historic feats this year. IMO he's already a tier 2/top 10 SG, and he's just gonna get better. He's MUCH, MUCH better than a cog in a machine. Just wait till next year.
Malinhion
Banned User
Posts: 10,071
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Holding a Players-Only Meeting

 

Post#25 » by Malinhion » Thu May 29, 2008 6:28 pm

Baller 24 wrote:That Nuggets team was missing one thing on their team in 2003, and that was scoring. Melo came onto a team that had a starting lineup of Miller, Lenard, Melo, Nene, Camby, pretty damn all around team if you ask me. He came in and did what he had to do, and that was score points.


I heard this argument a lot, and I've seen it several times from you. It sounds good, but there's a reason that the Nuggtes only won 17 games and were in place to draft Anthony in the first place.

Camby averaged 7-7, and missed 50 games. Nothing has really changed in that department since. His numbers are a little better (10-10), but he misses a ton of games every season.

Voshon Lenard was actually added in the same offseason as Carmelo, despite being literally beyond his last legs at that point. Sure he was 30, but his achilles was so beyond repair that he played 3 games the next season before calling it quits. He may have scored 14 points a game, but he did it at a .422 clip and contributed nothing else but turnovers.

Andre Miller was also added that offseason, and he was the only consistent piece alongside Melo. But it's not like he was much more than an above-average point guard. He can't shoot, but he is ball dominant. He's a great playmaker for other players, but he can't get an open shot for himself. If you sit and think about it, there are a lot of point guards who are better than him. He is servicable.

Boykins was an atrocious chucker who fired up the ball every time he touched it. But he was considered a "sparkplug" because you could actually fit him in the engine of your mini cooper.

Obviously the team was having bigger problems than one scorer could fix. They were the worst offensive team in the league. Now, after adding one of the best finishers, they've been making the playoffs with 40-50 wins every season. Nene almost averaged 10-6...almost. But he also missed 30 games with an injury.

Are you forgetting that the Nuggets have been the most injury-plagued franchise since drafting Carmelo? The next year they added K-Mart from Jersey, who proceeded to miss beaucoup games over the next few seasons with lingering microfracture issues.

Now the reason I say the Nuggets win more and are a better team with AI then Melo:
Iverson's win shares with the Nuggets: 33 to only 15 loses, while his offensive win share was up to 24.7.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla...sal01.html
Melo's win shares with the Nuggets: 24 and 19 loses, while his offensive win share production was 14.5.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla...oca01.html


While I'm aware that win shares are generally credible, I'm wary of "advanced statistics" and other things you don't really see from watching the games themselves.

To me, Iverson had trouble coexisting with a second option for years in Philly. There was nobody they could bring in to put up enough points or shoot a good enough percentage. Iggy was a high % guard, but was too young to bring volume scoring and was hampered in that respect by Iverson. Webber got his 20/10, but it seems like he was taking 30 shots a night. Stick him in Denver, and they let him be the main facilitator. However he didn't also have to be the #1 option, because Melo is such a great finisher. Voila! You have Iverson putting up ridiculous assist numbers, and his FG% was higher than he could ever dream.

Melos best season as an all around player was 2006, and he played terrific, while even helping his team, his turnovers were lower, and his win shares were a career best. Playing with AI has made all that disappear and he has since turned into hurting his team as much as helping them. But the reason I say the Nuggets are better with AI, is because of his win production, he gives you a solid all around player compared to Melo. If there is a player the Nuggets want to keep, its AI, not Melo. It also shows when Melo has been mentioned in many rumors.


The Nuggets would be stupid to keep Iverson over Carmelo. Don't get me wrong--Iverson was my favorite player until the Heat drafted Wade. But doesn't what you just told me indicate that having Iverson on the team is hurting Carmelo? Every offseason people question whether Iverson is finally going to drop off. Personally, I'll believe it when I see it. But that doesn't mean that you dump a much younger franchise player to get a point guard who could drop off any day. Plus, Iverson's contract is running out. If you had him on the Nuggets without Melo, they would be in much worse shape...why do you think Iverson is having the best production of his career?

They were "shopping" Carmelo because they wanted to see who was available. They had absolutely no intention of trading him. That was just pre-lottery draft hype.
User avatar
Baller 24
RealGM
Posts: 16,637
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 11, 2006

 

Post#26 » by Baller 24 » Thu May 29, 2008 6:38 pm

Malinhion wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



The Nuggets would be stupid to keep Iverson over Carmelo. Don't get me wrong--Iverson was my favorite player until the Heat drafted Wade. But doesn't what you just told me indicate that having Iverson on the team is hurting Carmelo? Every offseason people question whether Iverson is finally going to drop off. Personally, I'll believe it when I see it. But that doesn't mean that you dump a much younger franchise player to get a point guard who could drop off any day. Plus, Iverson's contract is running out. If you had him on the Nuggets without Melo, they would be in much worse shape...why do you think Iverson is having the best production of his career?

They were "shopping" Carmelo because they wanted to see who was available. They had absolutely no intention of trading him. That was just pre-lottery draft hype.


Yeah it makes sense they wouldn't want to get rid of Melo over AI, but I'm just bringing in some statistics from what AI has done, and what Melo has done. AI obviously has hurt Melo's game a lot, Melo was a top 10 player in 2006, since then his all around game has been steadily hurting his team with his high turnover percentage, and sometimes bad shot selection. I just know one thing, one or the other has to go, obviously the Nuggets would keep Melo due to his age, and scoring ability. But they also need to IMO change the whole look of that team. Just do a complete make over, when I say this, I'm saying if your getting rid of AI, get rid of the others, they have been to the playoffs every year, and obviously if they want to build around Melo, there going to have to get rid of some players. If anything, keep Melo, Camby, some other potential players, but other then that, get a compelte make over. Because not only is Melo getting older, but its hurting his image as a player with all the continues losses, and inability to be a contender ever year with a talented supporting cast.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
Malinhion
Banned User
Posts: 10,071
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Holding a Players-Only Meeting

 

Post#27 » by Malinhion » Thu May 29, 2008 7:24 pm

The team probably needs a makeover.

They have enough talent to win a title, but the coaching has led them far astray.

I'd hire Avery Johnson.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#28 » by Smills91 » Thu May 29, 2008 9:41 pm

It's Kevin Martin(Elite) vs. Your Starting SG(whoever that is).

Return to Player Comparisons