Dwyane Wade vs. Clyde Drexler

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
WesWesley
General Manager
Posts: 8,002
And1: 5
Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Location: TORONTO

Dwyane Wade vs. Clyde Drexler 

Post#1 » by WesWesley » Sun Jun 1, 2008 4:52 pm

Who is the better basketball player?

Peak years.

Dwyane Wade - 27.2/5.7/6.7

Clyde Drexler - 27.2/7.9/5.8
5:26 LAC - B. Davis misses a layup
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#2 » by kooldude » Sun Jun 1, 2008 6:23 pm

Wade
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
candy for lunch
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,583
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 20, 2007

 

Post#3 » by candy for lunch » Sun Jun 1, 2008 6:25 pm

Clyde, without a doubt.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,361
And1: 9,913
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#4 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jun 1, 2008 6:35 pm

Wade's best year is better than any of Clyde's years . . . better defense, equivalent offense (once you include the pace and fould drawing), plus the final MVP but . . .

Wade has only played 5 years in the league and only two of those were injury free . . . he has a LONG way to go to approach Clyde's career.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Wade3Iverson
Head Coach
Posts: 6,816
And1: 2
Joined: Dec 13, 2005

 

Post#5 » by Wade3Iverson » Sun Jun 1, 2008 6:57 pm

penbeast0 wrote:Wade's best year is better than any of Clyde's years . . . better defense, equivalent offense (once you include the pace and fould drawing), plus the final MVP but . . .

Wade has only played 5 years in the league and only two of those were injury free . . . he has a LONG way to go to approach Clyde's career.


Well said.
Image
The best engine in the world is the vagina -- started with one finger, self-lubricating, takes any size piston and changes it's own oil every month. Pitty it's so temperamental
Patterns
Banned User
Posts: 6,008
And1: 18
Joined: Sep 19, 2007

 

Post#6 » by Patterns » Sun Jun 1, 2008 8:05 pm

Better basketball player? Wade
halfHAVOC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,864
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Contact:
 

 

Post#7 » by halfHAVOC » Sun Jun 1, 2008 10:49 pm

wade isn't even in his prime yet and when healthy hes still better.
Stream My New Basketball Anthem "KING": https://ampl.ink/7QwkY
User avatar
Flash3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 52,635
And1: 403
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Location: L-I-M-R

 

Post#8 » by Flash3 » Sun Jun 1, 2008 10:59 pm

Could've sworn we had this debate just 2 weeks ago.....
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.
User avatar
Basileus777
General Manager
Posts: 7,822
And1: 2,051
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: New Jersey
 

 

Post#9 » by Basileus777 » Sun Jun 1, 2008 11:00 pm

Wade's peak might be better, but he hasn't done it long enough to put him over Clyde.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#10 » by kooldude » Mon Jun 2, 2008 12:41 am

Basileus777 wrote:Wade's peak might be better, but he hasn't done it long enough to put him over Clyde.


who cares what about Wade's career when his peak is already better. The Q is who's the better player, not who's career is longer and more comprehensive...
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
Baller 24
RealGM
Posts: 16,637
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 11, 2006

 

Post#11 » by Baller 24 » Mon Jun 2, 2008 12:56 am

Both similar players as of right now when you look at stats and how they played. Both weren't good 3 pt shooters (Clyde was later on in his career). And both were above average defenders, both have/had great play making skills, and scoring is similar.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#12 » by kooldude » Mon Jun 2, 2008 1:23 am

Baller 24 wrote:Both similar players as of right now when you look at stats and how they played. Both weren't good 3 pt shooters (Clyde was later on in his career). And both were above average defenders, both have/had great play making skills, and scoring is similar.


Wade's peak is significantly better than Clyde's. Their numbers are similar because of pace; once you adjust them, Wade's numbers will be superior too.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
Baller 24
RealGM
Posts: 16,637
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 11, 2006

 

Post#13 » by Baller 24 » Mon Jun 2, 2008 1:31 am

kooldude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Wade's peak is significantly better than Clyde's. Their numbers are similar because of pace; once you adjust them, Wade's numbers will be superior too.


True, Drexlar like Wade was the primary source of offense on a terrific team with the Blazers in this prime. He went to the finals twice, but never won one, arguably he was the 2nd best shooting guard in the league during his prime, behind Jordan. Which isn't saying much since Jordan was on a completely different level.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
User avatar
nycballer718
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,849
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 06, 2006
Location: new york city

 

Post#14 » by nycballer718 » Mon Jun 2, 2008 4:05 am

i get tired of hearing that about wade....i'll let the haters put it in their sigs...i guarantee we haven't seen the best of wade. not even close. he works too hard for anyone to ever think his best years are ahead of him at only 26 years old.
User avatar
shawngoat23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 287
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

 

Post#15 » by shawngoat23 » Mon Jun 2, 2008 5:29 am

Clyde.

I'd take his prime over Wade's too.
penbeast0 wrote:Yes, he did. And as a mod, I can't even put him on ignore . . . sigh.
jzmagik
Banned User
Posts: 5,528
And1: 0
Joined: May 06, 2005
Location: NYC

 

Post#16 » by jzmagik » Mon Jun 2, 2008 5:39 am

kooldude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Wade's peak is significantly better than Clyde's. Their numbers are similar because of pace; once you adjust them, Wade's numbers will be superior too.


LOL if you're going to adjust for pace, you might as well adjust for handcheck rules too.
User avatar
gavran
RealGM
Posts: 18,216
And1: 8,954
Joined: Nov 02, 2005
Location: crossing the line

 

Post#17 » by gavran » Mon Jun 2, 2008 6:54 am

Baller 24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


He went to the finals twice, but never won one,

Except that one year of course, when he did win the 'chip.
User avatar
Yangsing
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,361
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 28, 2007

 

Post#18 » by Yangsing » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:07 pm

jzmagik wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



LOL if you're going to adjust for pace, you might as well adjust for handcheck rules too.


Also adjust for touch fouls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aySGUzzxjGE

Return to Player Comparisons