Vince Carter or Paul Pierce
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
- Reks
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,507
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 30, 2007
bostonfan34 wrote:The fact that you have to compare a 'motivated' Vince vs. Pierce is exactly his biggest problem.
He SHOULD be motivated. He is a loser, though. Are we really going to sit here and say, oh, Vince would be this good if he actually tried? That's idiotic.
Pierce is a better leader, a better rebounder, WAY better defender, better 3PT shooter (look at the stats, Paul has shot 39% from 3 the last couple years), playmaker, more clutch... this isn't even a good comparison.
I'll take the guy that's in the NBA Finals and hasn't quit on his team and demanded a trade.
You're taking the same guy that without KG and Ray Ray only won 24(?) games last season.
menflavor
easily the worst realgm screen name
easily the worst realgm screen name
-
- Senior
- Posts: 504
- And1: 19
- Joined: Oct 01, 2007
^ yo bostonfan34 is correct
Carter is a better athelete than pierce but who isnt? Vince Carter is looser who is overrated and jacks up shots. cool kids, wasnt pierce injured last season. did the celtics loose 21 strait without pierce?...thank you.
pierce vs johnson is a better comparison because both does the same thang equally.
Carter is a better athelete than pierce but who isnt? Vince Carter is looser who is overrated and jacks up shots. cool kids, wasnt pierce injured last season. did the celtics loose 21 strait without pierce?...thank you.
pierce vs johnson is a better comparison because both does the same thang equally.
Twitter.com/Hood_President Follow Me!!!!!
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,864
- And1: 176
- Joined: Jul 19, 2006
- Contact:
-
if you saw him play after kidd left and knew he was playin on basically one leg you would have seen he had alot of passion and he was actually trying but being like tmac in the sense was setting up his teammates alot playing more of the point gaurd role cuz harris isn't a pure pg. next year hes gonna be back to normal if not better.
even on one leg his defense was solid if hes healthy his defense is better, if the nets had more offense other than RJ then he could be a better defender and not waste so much energy on offense.
even on one leg his defense was solid if hes healthy his defense is better, if the nets had more offense other than RJ then he could be a better defender and not waste so much energy on offense.
Stream My New Basketball Anthem "KING": https://ampl.ink/7QwkY
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,528
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 06, 2005
- Location: NYC
Hood President wrote:^ yo bostonfan34 is correct
Carter is a better athelete than pierce but who isnt? Vince Carter is looser who is overrated and jacks up shots. cool kids, wasnt pierce injured last season. did the celtics loose 21 strait without pierce?...thank you.
pierce vs johnson is a better comparison because both does the same thang equally.
If Vince Carter is a loser, what does that make you?

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,467
- And1: 5,348
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
- celticfan42487
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,526
- And1: 15,365
- Joined: Jul 22, 2005
- Location: Billerica, MA
-