Kwame Brown Vs. Michael Olowakandi.
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Kwame Brown Vs. Michael Olowakandi.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,002
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Kwame Brown Vs. Michael Olowakandi.
Which would you rather have on your team? Who is the worst player of the two. Which is the bigger bust?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 10,071
- And1: 3
- Joined: Oct 03, 2006
- Location: Holding a Players-Only Meeting
I'd rather have Kwame. At least Phil turned him into something servicable. An athletic, rebounding big who's a lock-down man defender. He's expiring this summer, and I don't expect him to get that big of a deal. When he's not on such an atrocious contract I think people might start to look at him more favorably. Sure, he's a bust, but I can see him being a helpful part on a team that already has a frontcourt piece.
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,095
- And1: 20,070
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
- RJM
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,609
- And1: 2,266
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
-
- shawngoat23
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,622
- And1: 287
- Joined: Apr 17, 2008
I wouldn't want either, but I'll take Kwame. I hate to say this, but I'll take his pathetic offensive game over Olowokandi, who averaged like 43% from the field for his career. As a big man.
And as crappy as his hands are, he turns the ball over much less than Olowokandi.
And as crappy as his hands are, he turns the ball over much less than Olowokandi.
penbeast0 wrote:Yes, he did. And as a mod, I can't even put him on ignore . . . sigh.