ImageImageImage

Pre-Draft Camp Measurements are out

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan

tk76
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,615
And1: 734
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Pre-Draft Camp Measurements are out 

Post#1 » by tk76 » Tue Jun 3, 2008 6:03 pm

http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Ent ... ased-2911/

No Speights, but still lots of numbers to over-analyze.

Probably there are only a few instances where these numbers truly project major problems or potential in players that hasn't already shown on the court, but it is still interesting.

I was wondering if Love would have a better standing reach than Thaddeus, and it turns out they both are the same (8'10".) Brook Lopez (9'5") has a 7" reach advantage to Love when they are fighting for a rebound. Keep in mind that other undersized PF's like Boozer and Brand had long arms (Boozer's reach is 9'1.5", making him effectively 3.5" taller than Love.) On the other hand, promising back-ups like Maxiel (8'11), Bass (8'10.5) and Milsap (8'9.5) are in Loves range.

Arthur's numbers are underwhelming, measuring out only 6 lbs heavier and 0.5" longer reach than Young (and the same weight and 1" longer reach than Iguodala when he was drafted.)

The biggest impact of these measurements is in how it will effect GM's. Some players may drop (Arthur), while others might rise dramatically effecting the Sixers options.
tk76
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,615
And1: 734
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

 

Post#2 » by tk76 » Tue Jun 3, 2008 6:16 pm

Looking at last years numbers, to be fair to Love, his numbers are pretty close to Horford's. He measured out as a good athlete.
dbodner
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,474
And1: 536
Joined: Feb 18, 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by dbodner » Tue Jun 3, 2008 9:15 pm

Love's vertical and bench press numbers will do him well.

BTW, if anyone has problems with draftexpress, can you do two things for me:
1) Let me know your ISP (you can pm me if you don't want this public)
2) let me know if you can ping draftexpress.com (start | run | cmd | ping www.draftexpress.com)

Thanks.
twitter.com/DerekBodnerNBA :: Senior writer, The Athletic Philadelphia
dbodner
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,474
And1: 536
Joined: Feb 18, 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by dbodner » Tue Jun 3, 2008 9:16 pm

Mayo's #'s do him well as well.
twitter.com/DerekBodnerNBA :: Senior writer, The Athletic Philadelphia
PhilasFinest
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 3,581
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
     

 

Post#5 » by PhilasFinest » Tue Jun 3, 2008 10:28 pm

Id LOVE to see us trade up and nab Kevin Love
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
Skates
Head Coach
Posts: 7,305
And1: 3,849
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
       

 

Post#6 » by Skates » Tue Jun 3, 2008 10:45 pm

Donte Green measured out pretty well, conversely Darrell Arthur's numbers are very disapointing.

Eric Gordon has an insane wingspan for his size. I think Gordon may be the Thad Young of this draft, drafted lower than he would have been out of high school after an inconsistent freshman season, but makes a very good pro, possibly better than Mayo or Bayless.

I always love how some guys are 0.5 inches taller in their shoes and others are about 2 inches taller. Hey, get me a pair of those platform Nikes.
roseorbust
Senior
Posts: 725
And1: 6
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Location: bottom 3 city

 

Post#7 » by roseorbust » Tue Jun 3, 2008 11:36 pm

My god Joe Alexender is a freak.
The New Brand turned Bland
freshie2
RealGM
Posts: 11,383
And1: 599
Joined: Jun 24, 2004

 

Post#8 » by freshie2 » Tue Jun 3, 2008 11:58 pm

Yes...for anyone who wanted Darrel Arthur as the PF for the Sixers, they better have the same opinion about Alexander. Really shocked they measured out so similarly considering how much more athletic Alexander appeared on the court. Who knows how they pan out in the pros, but Alexander really does stand out when you compare the two.

Love's vert was more than expected...still a bit undersized. If you are going to roll the dice on 2-3 year potential, Randolph and McGee. Randolph is a risk if you take him too high, but he'll probably still go in the top 5-6. McGee is so long and athletic, but how can you tap into that head and get some production?? I saw some of the internet clips, and he really moves like a skilled PF, and now he measures out like a true center. How much of a gamble is he @ 16?? Not my first choice, but if he has the head and work ethic, he really could be something in a few years.
freshie2
RealGM
Posts: 11,383
And1: 599
Joined: Jun 24, 2004

 

Post#9 » by freshie2 » Wed Jun 4, 2008 12:12 am

Much less excited after looking at the measurements...will they post the Euro measurements somewhere? Now I'm more interested in guys like Batum, KK, Ajinca to see how they compare to the Americans.
freshie2
RealGM
Posts: 11,383
And1: 599
Joined: Jun 24, 2004

 

Post#10 » by freshie2 » Wed Jun 4, 2008 12:50 am

McGee's standing reach is only surpassed by Yao Ming's measurements historically. Not sure if some others didn't measure, but that's the only one that tops him in the historical chart. On the flip side, O'Bryant and Sene are right below him by about an inch, so standing reach doesn't mean a ton if you can't play the game.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers