Partial measurements released

jmon · Post #1 » by **jmon** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 5:49 pm

http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-pre-dra ... ft=0&sort=

http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Par ... ased-2911/

figured id post it for you guys.

SendEm · Post #2 » by **SendEm** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 6:03 pm

Love just dropped in the draft with his small forward standing reach...

SendEm · Post #3 » by **SendEm** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 6:06 pm

I knew Derrick Rose was short. Just think last year at this time he was said to be a 6'5" PG.

jmon · Post #4 » by **jmon** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 6:09 pm

I am starting to like these round 2 PFs in Othello Hunter and Richard Hendrix more and more each day... Maxiell and Millsap anyone?

SendEm · Post #5 » by **SendEm** » Tue Jun 3, 2008 6:14 pm

Woah OJ Mayo has a 41 inch vertical? I didn't see that one coming. He must play under complete control out on the court...

Post #6 » by **The Guilty Party** » Wed Jun 4, 2008 3:21 pm

How about Patrick Ewing having a 42 inch vertical?? I think he'll be a nice pick in the 2nd round for some team.

Post #7 » by **tk76** » Wed Jun 4, 2008 4:04 pm

How is Alexander as big and better at every stat then Arthur? He is longer, bigger, stronger, faster and a better leaper.

So Arthur is a prototypical PF but Alexander is a SF?
http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-pre-dra ... ft=0&sort=

SendEm · Post #8 » by **SendEm** » Wed Jun 4, 2008 6:01 pm

tk76 wrote:How is Alexander as big and better at every stat then Arthur? He is longer, bigger, stronger, faster and a better leaper.

So Arthur is a prototypical PF but Alexander is a SF?
http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-pre-dra ... ft=0&sort=

They don't have a "measurement" for how well you box out, defend bigs, and score interior baskets. You normally have to watch the games to ascertain those values. Apparently Arthur right now is better at doing those things than Alexander...Arthur's measurements and skill set have BUST written all over them.

SendEm · Post #9 » by **SendEm** » Wed Jun 4, 2008 6:07 pm

The Guilty Party wrote:How about Patrick Ewing having a 42 inch vertical?? I think he'll be a nice pick in the 2nd round for some team.

His standing reach CAN'T be right. They say it's only 8'1" while he's 6'6" with a 7'0" wingspan.

They must have meant to put 8'11"...

Ca · Post #10 » by Ca » Wed Jun 4, 2008 6:14 pm

Love actually helped himself out a bit with the agility drills.

He has a better standing reach than Troy Murphy & a similar one to Drew Gooden. (both pretty effective rebounders) No he isn't an physical marvel like Dwight Howard, but he's pleanty big to play PF.

The Sixer Fixer · Post #11 » by **The Sixer Fixer** » Thu Jun 5, 2008 1:01 am

tk76 wrote:So Arthur is a prototypical PF but Alexander is a SF?
http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-pre-dra ... ft=0&sort=

I don't think anyone really has said Arthur is a "prototypical PF". Actually, all I have heard about him is that he's more a tweener. Probably not skilled enough to play SF, but he's not really physical so playing PF in the NBA will take some adjusting. I think he will be fine offensively, but defense would be my concern for him.

I think Alexander has also been seen as a bit of a tweener. No one ever saw him as a PF, but when he bulked up over the last year or so, people started to think he could see spot minutes at PF in the NBA.

Dedicated_76ers_fan · Post #12 » by **Dedicated_76ers_fan** » Thu Jun 5, 2008 2:59 pm

I think the guy who dropped to at least the second pick is Michael Beasley. At 6'8, he's no longer a big PF. More of a SF/PF Hybrid like Carmelo Anthony.

SendEm · Post #13 » by **SendEm** » Thu Jun 5, 2008 3:27 pm

Dedicated_76ers_fan wrote:I think the guy who dropped to at least the second pick is Michael Beasley. At 6'8, he's no longer a big PF. More of a SF/PF Hybrid like Carmelo Anthony.

Rudy Gay even has a higher standing reach and vertical leap than Beasley. But you can't measure "timing," and that's what Beasley possesses in abundance.