Chris Wilcox Arrested

The place to discuss the history of Seattle Supersonics Basketball.

Moderator: Cactus Jack

Patches Pal
Sophomore
Posts: 217
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 14, 2008

 

Post#21 » by Patches Pal » Thu Jun 5, 2008 4:31 pm

Sweezo said,
"If he can afford a handgun, or two, then he can afford to go down to the local sheriff's office, plunk over the fee, and fill out a form. I have no sympathy for him."

You also are making assumptions about his guilt or innocence. As a member of law enforcement this is a horrible attitude for you to have. This mornings Seattle Times report indicates Chris Wilcox was the passenger in the car. The gun probably was not his.

Unfortuately law enforcement personnel always assume a crime has been committed and damage innocent people with an arrest record. I hope he sues the pants off that police officer. Perception is reality. The perception of law enforcement in this country is pretty low and declining all the time. It could have been handled with a warning not an arrest and from the little we know I still see no probable cause for asking them to exit the vehicle or a search. We will learn more in the days ahead.
Sweezo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,215
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 12, 2001
       

 

Post#22 » by Sweezo » Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:01 am

Patches Pal wrote:You also are making assumptions about his guilt or innocence.


You must have missed the "if" in front of the statement you decry...

Patches Pal wrote:As a member of law enforcement this is a horrible attitude for you to have.


This would mean something to me if I was a member of law enforcement...

Patches Pal wrote:This mornings Seattle Times report indicates Chris Wilcox was the passenger in the car. The gun probably was not his.


If there was a gun in the vehicle on the date in question, do you know where the gun was located in the car relative to Wilcox? Constructive possession...look it up...

Patches Pal wrote:Unfortuately law enforcement personnel always assume a crime has been committed and damage innocent people with an arrest record.


They have to. If they have a guy who is not licensed to carry a firearm, and has a firearm in his possession, the officer has no business making the determination that no crime occurred and letting the person go. Abso[i]lute[i]ly not his job...

Patches Pal wrote:I hope he sues the pants off that police officer.


So you're rooting for Chris Wilcox, the millionaire, to institute and action which would likely ruin the career of a blue collar civil servant? And you're doing so without even knowing any details about the incident? Yeah, I'm sure that lawsuit would do wonders for his career and marketability...

Patches Pal wrote:The perception of law enforcement in this country is pretty low and declining all the time.


...says a random poster on the internet...

I'd say the public opinion of criminals is probably lower than that of law enforcement.

Patches Pal wrote:It could have been handled with a warning not an arrest


He'd been charged with the same crime before. Not exactly warning material...

Fun times for the officer, too, if he decides to give a warning and that gun is used later that night for a less than ideal purpose.

Patches Pal wrote:and from the little we know I still see no probable cause for asking them to exit the vehicle or a search.


That's because there's no additional info currently available to the public as far as I can tell.
sipclip
Head Coach
Posts: 6,859
And1: 1,241
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

 

Post#23 » by sipclip » Fri Jun 6, 2008 3:29 am

I can't believe some of you guys think this is a big deal. It's absolutely nothing. I also see that you guys aren't aware that Wilcox did have a concealed weapons permit during the first time he was arrested but it was for North Carolina. I guess the permits aren't valid in other states.
User avatar
Troy McClure
Banned User
Posts: 4,415
And1: 46
Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Location: Springfield

 

Post#24 » by Troy McClure » Fri Jun 6, 2008 6:31 am

CatchNShoot wrote:Free Chris Wilcox! These charges are trumped up! To wit:

1. He's not a great shot.

2. He's incapable of stealing.

3. He's allergic to the (cell) block.

4. He doesn't need illegal defense.

5. He won't take the charge(s).

6. He never played for the Bullets

So there.


Lol, pretty funny.
User avatar
myELFboy
Analyst
Posts: 3,439
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 28, 2005

 

Post#25 » by myELFboy » Fri Jun 6, 2008 10:35 pm

i love how the article cites his Wikipedia biography as though it's a credible source...

Return to Seattle Supersonics Basketball