Tinsley Trade with NJN

massey1992 · Post #1 » by **massey1992** » Fri Jun 6, 2008 2:01 pm

Pacers incoming

Keith Van Horn
Maurice Ager

Pacers outgoing

Jamaal Tinsley

Nets incoming

Jamaal Tinsley

Net's outgoing

Keith van Horn
Maurice Ager

Why for the Pacers?
They get rid of a horrible contract plus a guy that the fans are not exactly thrilled with on or off the court. They bring in an expiring and a young guard that can play well when givin minutes.

Why for the Nets?
They get a good solid backup or starting guard for Devin Harris. They get rid of a few of the young players that won't be getting minutes in their organization.

What do you guys think of it?

FreeRon · Post #2 » by **FreeRon** » Fri Jun 6, 2008 2:18 pm

Of course we'd do it. The Nets wouldn't.

Post #3 » by **count55** » Fri Jun 6, 2008 2:23 pm

FreeRon wrote:Of course we'd do it. The Nets wouldn't.

Dcbaseballer52 · Post #4 » by **Dcbaseballer52** » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:04 pm

do they not already have Devin Harris AND Marcus Williams

:lol:

bballpacen · Post #5 » by **bballpacen** » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:07 pm

count55 wrote:
FreeRon wrote:Of course we'd do it. The Nets wouldn't.

Indydave · Post #6 » by **Indydave** » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:30 pm

The Pacers would do that trade tomorrow if they could, but don't think the Nets will.

Post #7 » by **PR07** » Fri Jun 6, 2008 5:01 pm

Is the Lions' Matt Millen running the Nets now and has an infatuation with PG's instead of WR's?

massey1992 · Post #8 » by **massey1992** » Fri Jun 6, 2008 5:26 pm

They are said to like Tinsley because he is a pass first point guard. Van Horn isn't doing anything and Ager isn't working out there.