KnicksMetsJetsNova wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
you're joking? what are you 7 years old? an original nba team, 2 titles in the 70s in one of the most competitive eras in nba history.. do you even know who clyde frazier is? willis reed? red holzman? i guess they sucked in the 90s too? you know always competing with MJ's bulls? i guess cause the knicks suck now, they all the sudden are not a storied franchise?
So two titles, three HOFers, and competing with a dynasty makes a team storied? The Rockets are just as storied then? What about the Hawks? The Bucks? The point is the Knicks are a third tier team in the NBA, really.
Tier 1: Celtics and Lakers. End of story.
Tier 2: Bulls and maybe Spurs.
Tier 3: Spurs if they didn't make tier 2. Pistons. Sixers. Knicks, maybe Bucks.
Tier 4: Everyone else.
anyone who thinks lebron wouldnt make more playing in nyc in madison square garden is a complete fool.. cleveland? you gotta be kidding me 50% of their loser fanbase is made up of teenage bandwagoners who are on lebrons d*ck.. dude said it himself, he wants to be the richest man on the planet, playing for the knicks wont do it but he WILL make millions more as a knick than ANY other team, even if the nets move to brooklyn, it aint the same, they arent the knicks, they dont play in the worlds most famous arena, hate all you want but if he indeed does come to the knicks (and im not gonna get my hopes up), you will see the impact it makes.. new york is bigger and more important that alot of you think
As someone else said, that's why Ewing made more in endorsements than Shaq in Orlando, right?
at ppl underestimating new york
It's funny people overestimating it, too. You know LA has about as many people as NY when it comes to metro area, right? And Chicago has like 70% the population as well. And the Bay Area has almost as many as Chicago. New York's great and all, but it doesn't make or break people.