rsavaj wrote:I'm leaving the "mourning" phase and slowly transitioning into the "nervous anxiety" phase...
Yep.
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
because mike dantoni has one of the shortest rotations / leashes in the entire NBA and 95% of other coaches will play those guys that dantoni didnttosweet68 wrote:I'm curious as to why people think that a new coach will automatically play the young players that the old coach didn't.
I also want to know how any free agents will be signed without making a S&T move, since the Suns are over the cap. The MLE will only go so far.
-SDU- wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
personally i cant fathom how people cant see all the good he did for this franchise
KJ7 wrote:If I'm to be honest I just want this forthcoming season to be over with. I don't see us winning it next season but the following season we'll have some massive contracts coming off the books so we might be able to do some trades to put us in a better position.
We are stuck in a transition phase. We're still a good team but IMO not good enuff to win the whole thing. So I see next season as being a blend of making some massive decisions. Do we persist with Diaw and LB. Do we start winding down Nash/Shaq espec if we have a poor start to the season?
This next season could well be like the one in which we traded Marbury. Old side with a big salary which *could* do something but if I'm being realistic won't.
Unless something drastic happens next season will be all about how we start. If we start well then the oldies will play a lot. If we start off crap Shaq's gonna find something to complain about and mgmt will have to make a call about whether we start looking to the future or limp into the play-offs and have another early exit.
So no ... I'm not refreshed by any stretch of the imagination.
KJ7 wrote:Not taking a dig here but what has Tucker shown to make you think he could even be a role player? I know he carved open the D-League but really that doesn't hold a lot of weight with me considering what others have done there. The problem with Tucker is I see him doing most of his best work with the ball in his hands. And he's not good enuff to be relied upon to even carry the bench. So where does that leave him?
DJ I can understand. At least we've seen him have glimpses of good defensive efforts. I have likened him to an Aaron McKie type. I think he'll be a good bench player to a borderline starter (give him 2 years). The biggest problem with DJ is that next season is the final year of his contract because he was a 2nd round pick. So if he plays well next season are we really going to spend money to retain him? I hope so but realistically?
garrick wrote:If we can just get a couple more pieces like an athletic SF who can shoot and defend thereby putting Hill back on the bench where he belongs and a back up PG we may have a good shot in the playoffs.
Hill is an excellent SF but he is injury prone and we really need to watch his minutes.
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
Hello, I am from the Milwaukee Bucks board and I am a looooooooooooooonnngg time Bucks and NBA fan from way back.Go7enKs wrote:Well...I think your feeling is called delusion. But I really hope you are right when you say that D'Antoni was our problem and that we are better off with a practically inexperienced coach who isn't nearly as proven as Mike was.
I repeat, I TOTALLY hope you are right. But, as of now, we made a MAJOR step back. Time will tell.