The Official Thread for the #4 Pick

The place to discuss the history of Seattle Supersonics Basketball.

Moderator: Cactus Jack

sonic-ben
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,290
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
Location: in the clouds

 

Post#221 » by sonic-ben » Tue Jun 3, 2008 11:54 pm

hopefully the Nets

Sean Williams and filler, #10,#21 for Wilcox and #4
Go cougs
FARMERMAN10
Veteran
Posts: 2,754
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2005

 

Post#222 » by FARMERMAN10 » Wed Jun 4, 2008 12:07 am

^If we do that, then package 21 and a future pick to get another lottery pick, I'm happy.

Who would the Nets want so badly at the #4?
User avatar
HeavyP
Starter
Posts: 2,072
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
Location: Bonney Lake, Washington
Contact:
     

 

Post#223 » by HeavyP » Wed Jun 4, 2008 3:46 am

Chad ford also said:

Two different team executives told me in Orlando that Sonics GM Sam Presti had called about trading the No. 4 pick. One trade would have the Sonics moving down a few spots in the lottery. The other would have the Sonics moving significantly down.

I'm not sure how much to read into it because a Sonics source made it sound like the team was high on Jerryd Bayless, and I doubt he's on the board past No. 6. We'll see what happens.


Moving a little ways down could be something like: Ridnour + #4 for Malik Rose #6 Or possibly something with the #9.

My guess is moving signifcantly down is a play to get Iggy or Kevin Martin (not likely), or Beidrins.

Obviously those could require more then the #4, but I don't know what else they could be looking at..
User avatar
Det the Threat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,384
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Location: Germany
   

 

Post#224 » by Det the Threat » Wed Jun 4, 2008 6:08 pm

HeavyP wrote:
Moving a little ways down could be something like: Ridnour + #4 for Malik Rose #6 Or possibly something with the #9.

My guess is moving signifcantly down is a play to get Iggy or Kevin Martin (not likely), or Beidrins.

Obviously those could require more then the #4, but I don't know what else they could be looking at..


I really wouldn't like to move down in this draft, as i couldn't think who we should take in the later lottery.
So moving down should bring back a guy that is already established in this league but still young enough to be paired with Durant and Green.

A guy like Devin Harris of the Nets comes to mind.

So maybe something like #4, Wilcox, Griffin for #21, Harris, Van Horn

BTW: We couldn't trade for Biedrins or Igoudala during the draft, as both of them are RFA's this summer. Martin is a guy i'm not that interested in.
User avatar
HeavyP
Starter
Posts: 2,072
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
Location: Bonney Lake, Washington
Contact:
     

 

Post#225 » by HeavyP » Wed Jun 4, 2008 6:44 pm

I'm curious as to why you're not a fan of Kevin martin's? I think he'd be the perfect fit next to KD. that's a good point about the RFA's I didn't even think of that. So, I guess that leaves as people we could target with our pick and trading substantially low in the lottery as... Devin harris, Raymond Felton, Kevin Martin, Andrea Bargnani Maybe?

Other then that, I don't really see any other people we'd consider giving up our pick for..
User avatar
bennith13
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,600
And1: 23
Joined: Jun 10, 2001
Location: Lake Washington

 

Post#226 » by bennith13 » Wed Jun 4, 2008 6:51 pm

At this point I think my ideal draft if we cannot move up would be to take Bayless at 4 and then try to trade back into the lotto with the 24, our second round picks, and maybe a player. The more I read about Kevin Love the more think he would be a good player for us, just not at 4.
User avatar
Det the Threat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,384
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Location: Germany
   

 

Post#227 » by Det the Threat » Wed Jun 4, 2008 7:04 pm

HeavyP wrote:I'm curious as to why you're not a fan of Kevin martin's? I think he'd be the perfect fit next to KD.


I don't think that Martin is a good fit next to Durant.
He needs the ball in his hands to be effective and he's a scorer only.

We've already got Durant for that role and i'd rather have some more versatile players(especially on the the defensive end) next to Durant, to build that team.
User avatar
djthesonicsfan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,534
And1: 159
Joined: Aug 13, 2007
     

 

Post#228 » by djthesonicsfan » Wed Jun 4, 2008 7:48 pm

Assuming there is no negotiated settlement of the Sonics' court cases that result in Bennet losing ownership of the team, I'm sure Presti's marching orders are to: (a) develop the team for the future & (b) reduce near term payroll. Bottom line is that any player personnel scenario not fitting those two criteria is not likely to happen.

Scenarios that fit include:
- adding a couple more solid rookies
- stashing 2nd rounder picks in Europe
- jettisoning L Ridnour for a less costly & expiring contract
- encouraging D Wilkins to opt out
- only offering R Swift a minimum make good contract
- keeping only 13 players on the roster

Scenarios that don't fit include:
- any trade that increases the 2008/09 total salary
- any transaction that requires the Sonics to pay more than 13 players

We might not like it, but it is what it is. Besides, those two rookies Presti's going to add are going to be keepers. Here's hoping it'll be OJ Mayo & B Rush.
Patches Pal
Sophomore
Posts: 217
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 14, 2008

 

Post#229 » by Patches Pal » Thu Jun 5, 2008 8:49 pm

Ridnour had his worst year. Trading Watson while his value is high makes more sense to me. Let Rid start next year and his value will come way up. Then trade him the following year.

I don't see a clear preference after the top 10 picks. For example, Robin Lopez and Brandon Rush are all over the mock drafts depending on who guys like. All of these guys are projects at that point. Our #24 pick could net just as good a player as #15. We just get more guys to chose from.
User avatar
Hiphophead101
Senior
Posts: 693
And1: 68
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
     

 

Post#230 » by Hiphophead101 » Thu Jun 5, 2008 9:37 pm

sonic-ben wrote:hopefully the Nets

Sean Williams and filler, #10,#21 for Wilcox and #4


Yuck!

Sean Williams is a beast, but i'd prefer my #4 pick any day. Mayo/Bayless will put up 20+ easy in the league.

Maybe Sean Williams for wilcox straight up
Patches Pal
Sophomore
Posts: 217
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 14, 2008

 

Post#231 » by Patches Pal » Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:56 am

Maybe Sean Williams and #10 for Wilcox. Williams will not start ahead of Collison or Green.
User avatar
ryantony
Sophomore
Posts: 159
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 05, 2007

 

Post#232 » by ryantony » Sat Jun 7, 2008 7:09 pm

This is a little OT but..

"...more fond of Oklahoma City than Seattle is Indiana guard Eric Gordon. 'That would be a better spot (Oklahoma City) than being all the way up there in Seattle,' Gordon said...."

Don't be surprised with an Eric Gordon 4th pick?

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/basketbal...onx30.html
Ex-hippie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,213
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2003

 

Post#233 » by Ex-hippie » Sat Jun 7, 2008 11:17 pm

Patches Pal wrote:Ridnour had his worst year. Trading Watson while his value is high makes more sense to me. Let Rid start next year and his value will come way up. Then trade him the following year.


Ain't gonna happen. Ridnour is crap. I swear, he's quickly ascending my list of least favorite Sonics of all time, with Jim McIlvaine and Paul Westphal. He failed on a veteran team because he was all scared of big, scary Ray Allen. He failed on a young team that could have used a real leader at the point guard position. He's a little girly man, he never improved defensively, his offensive efficiency is low... I've just got no respect for his game whatsoever. If we can trade him along with a second round pick for an expiring, I'll be ecstatic.
BBen
Starter
Posts: 2,104
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2007

 

Post#234 » by BBen » Sun Jun 8, 2008 9:27 pm

Hey what do you guys think of Anthony Randolph? He's a 3/4 with a great handle, sweet jumper and an inside game. He's also a nice shot blocker and plays good help D. He's another 6'10 skinny guy that weighs about 200lbs though. We could start three really mobile big guys that have a handle with inside/outside games at 2/3/4. They'd also be really long on defense and create TONS of mismatches.
richboy
RealGM
Posts: 25,424
And1: 2,487
Joined: Sep 01, 2003

 

Post#235 » by richboy » Sun Jun 8, 2008 9:30 pm

I'm starting to think Kevin Love is the guy. I would take him at 4 if I think he is the guy. Last year I really thought Thaddeus Young or Rodney Stuckey was the guy I wanted for the Sonics but I harped on not taking them that high. Now if that draft was today they both would go top 5. If Kevin Love is the guy I say take him 4.
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful." John Wooden
User avatar
ryantony
Sophomore
Posts: 159
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 05, 2007

 

Post#236 » by ryantony » Sun Jun 8, 2008 10:44 pm

BBen wrote:Hey what do you guys think of Anthony Randolph? He's a 3/4 with a great handle, sweet jumper and an inside game. He's also a nice shot blocker and plays good help D. He's another 6'10 skinny guy that weighs about 200lbs though. We could start three really mobile big guys that have a handle with inside/outside games at 2/3/4. They'd also be really long on defense and create TONS of mismatches.


Also a great passer and dribbler for his size.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-CRtna5iDFc
User avatar
Hiphophead101
Senior
Posts: 693
And1: 68
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
     

 

Post#237 » by Hiphophead101 » Mon Jun 9, 2008 4:40 pm

He cant shoot

Return to Seattle Supersonics Basketball


cron