ImageImageImage

Who will have more success in MN Big Al or the Big ticket

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Who will have more team success in Minnesota

Al Jefferson
10
59%
Kevin Garnett
7
41%
 
Total votes: 17

cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

 

Post#21 » by cpfsf » Mon Jun 9, 2008 10:52 pm

lol, look on the bright side, if we kept Udrih, we might not have had the 3rd pick in the NBA draft. With two more wins we would have had a better record than Memphis, LAC, NY, Seattle, and Miami.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,522
And1: 4,979
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

 

Post#22 » by theGreatRC » Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:20 am

For the record, I said "When they get old" I never said the Lakers were old.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,662
And1: 22,230
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

 

Post#23 » by Klomp » Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:33 am

Am I the only one who hates Al always being compared to KG now? It gets kinda old.....
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#24 » by deeney0 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:51 am

nc21tarheels wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


They only have 2 guys with over 8 yrs experience. Kobe/Fisher. In fact, the average age of the Lakers is YOUNGER than our team. The Mavs only average 1 year older than our team too.
Compare that to the spurs who have 8 guys with over 10 yrs experience.


Sure, when you look at Walker and Buckner and Madsen. The Wolves core is remarkably young:

Jefferson: 23
Foye: 24
Brewer: 22
McCants: 23
Gomes: 25
Smith: 24
Telfair: 23 (as of today; Happy Birthday Bassy)
Snyder: 25
Jaric: 29
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

 

Post#25 » by cpfsf » Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:50 am

klomp44 wrote:Am I the only one who hates Al always being compared to KG now? It gets kinda old.....


Big Al is not KG and Green is not the next Tracy McGrady (Rockets fans thought that trade was a steal, man were they ever wrong).

Anyway, I am not comparing Al's individual performance to KG. Really this is more of a discussion of team success.

deeney0 wrote:Sure, when you look at Walker and Buckner and Madsen. The Wolves core is remarkably young:

Jefferson: 23
Foye: 24
Brewer: 22
McCants: 23
Gomes: 25
Smith: 24
Telfair: 23 (as of today; Happy Birthday Bassy)
Snyder: 25
Jaric: 29


Plus we got Richard and our 3 draft picks. Can't keep all of our FA's but we will bring in even more young talent.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

 

Post#26 » by big3_8_19_21 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:25 am

Devilzsidewalk wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I wish one of those players he chose to pay was Beno Udrih :(


I believe it when he sustains it. Dan Dickau was great for a year, too.

Also, go back and look at his season stats, they weren't THAT great. They were pretty much identical to Foye's who missed the first 43 games of the year and then had to start working the rust off. Really they're almost scarily similar.

Udrih:
32.0 MPG
12.8 PPG
4.3 APG
3.3 RPG
0.9 SPG
2.28 TO
2.10 PF
46.3% FG
38.7% 3FG
85.0% FT

Foye:
32.3 MPG
13.1 PPG
4.2 APG
3.3 RPG
0.9 SPG
2.03 TO
2.60 PF
42.9% FG
41.2% 3FG
81.5% FT
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

 

Post#27 » by big3_8_19_21 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:35 am

Udrih produced pretty consistently the same all season while Foye got leaps and bounds better each month back from injury, I won't go into all the stats, but I'll highlight some of them and then do a full stat layout for Foye on his last month

FOYE BY THE MONTH:
January (2 games):
9.0 ppg
1.0 apg
1.5 rpg
38.9% FG
33.3% 3FG

February:
10.0 ppg
2.6 apg
3.0 rpg
38.2% FG
41.9% 3FG

March:
12.5 ppg
5.3 apg
3.9 rpg
44.1% FG
40.4% 3FG

April (these are numbers he sustained for 10 games):
18.4 PPG
5.2 APG
3.0 RPG
1.4 TO
3.7 PF
1.1 STL
45.6% FG
42.3% 3FG
88.9% FT

THOSE are some nasty numbers in April. Assuming he improves some over the summer we could be looking at 20 ppg, 5-6 apg on 45/40/85 shooting %...I know this isn't a Foye thread, but I mean did KG ever have a player like that who actually stuck around? (besides a ROOKIE Foye).
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
User avatar
TMo519
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,274
And1: 25
Joined: Jun 10, 2008
Location: Twin Cities, MN

 

Post#28 » by TMo519 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:34 pm

It may be partly wishful thinking, but I think Al Jefferson will have more team success than KG. Part of that is because the entire core of this team is pretty young. Get 3 or 4 of these guys to produce and you got a nice nucleus for years to come. When KG was coming up, there was really just Marbury and then we all know where that went. I don't forsee a Marbury type situation coming, but some would argue that if they draft Mayo it could happen.

Plus, it kinda depends on what we're talking when you say more success. What if Big Al gets out of the 1st round three times, but misses the playoffs in like of the years in between or something like that? Is that "more successful" than 8 straight playoff appearances?
User avatar
mandurugo
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 231
Joined: Aug 14, 2002

 

Post#29 » by mandurugo » Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:57 pm

Well I don't think anyone can deny that Al got us a higher draft pick than KG ever did - score 1 for the new guy!
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,279
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

 

Post#30 » by shrink » Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:27 pm

I think getting back to the main question, it all depends on how you personally determine "success." If "success" means "rings" to you, KG was just as unsuccessful as Troy Hudson. If "success" means personally turning a perrenial laughingstock into a legitimate team that is respected by people here and around the world, then Garnett has been hugely successful. how many international posters do we have on these very boards simply because Garnett was Garnett, and drew them in?

I can't say Al won't be as successful as KG. Al is a tremendous player, and has a decent chance to win championships. However, in my opinion, KG, the greatest player in Timberwolves history, has left some pretty big shoes to fill.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves