Bayless is not a top 5 pick
Moderator: Cactus Jack
Bayless is not a top 5 pick
- S0yb3anB0y
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,841
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 18, 2003
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Bayless is not a top 5 pick
Guys!! Bayless is overrated because no other team in the top 6 will draft him. YES, the KNICKS wouldn't even draft him at #6. The only team that might want to draft him is the Clippers at #7. Let's not reach for the next Ben Gordon.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,876
- And1: 578
- Joined: Jun 30, 2001
Personally I would take Love and Alexander off your list and put Galinari and Batum on it. We are talking the first 15 spots, correct? Also, I was pretty high on Augustin but once I found out he's barely 170lbs I wonder about him. But I don't think I would consider him a gamble.
Some of the big men are definitely a gamble, depending on where they're taken. Names like Randolph, Jordan, Lopez, Speights, Koufos, Thompson, Hibbert, and McGee( a player I'm beginning to be intrigued by) all have a bit of a curiosity about how they'll fair in the NBA.
I expect some teams to follow conventional wisdom and pick these players higher than they should simply because of their size. How many will make it into the top half of the draft is a guess though.
I suppose the workouts should separate the pretenders from the contenders.
Some of the big men are definitely a gamble, depending on where they're taken. Names like Randolph, Jordan, Lopez, Speights, Koufos, Thompson, Hibbert, and McGee( a player I'm beginning to be intrigued by) all have a bit of a curiosity about how they'll fair in the NBA.
I expect some teams to follow conventional wisdom and pick these players higher than they should simply because of their size. How many will make it into the top half of the draft is a guess though.
I suppose the workouts should separate the pretenders from the contenders.
Re: Bayless is not a top 5 pick
- yearsago
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,831
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 13, 2002
- Location: Puyallup, Wa
- Contact:
-
Re: Bayless is not a top 5 pick
S0yb3anB0y wrote:Guys!! Bayless is overrated because no other team in the top 6 will draft him. YES, the KNICKS wouldn't even draft him at #6. The only team that might want to draft him is the Clippers at #7. Let's not reach for the next Ben Gordon.
THanks for your thoughts on Bayless, I am sure Presti will make a informed choice
- S0yb3anB0y
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,841
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 18, 2003
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
big L wrote:He's a bit of a gamble, but not the biggest. My biggest gambles for the first half of the first round in this draft would look something like:
1. DeAndre Jordan
2. Brooks Lopez
3. Kevin Love
4. Anthony Randolph
5. Joe Alexander
What're yours, Soy?
I really don't feel there is any big gamble in this year's draft. All the players drafted in the first round should be solid players. There is going to be at least 10 players ending up being a better player than Bayless.
Re: Bayless is not a top 5 pick
- wiff
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,887
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jul 22, 2006
- Location: Gettin da boot!
Re: Bayless is not a top 5 pick
S0yb3anB0y wrote:Guys!! Bayless is overrated because no other team in the top 6 will draft him. YES, the KNICKS wouldn't even draft him at #6. The only team that might want to draft him is the Clippers at #7. Let's not reach for the next Ben Gordon.
That is one hard hitting analysis.
Despite the fact that he averaged just shy of 20pts a game with 4 dimes, and despite the fact that he has top notch athleticism, I'm going to disregard the fact that he scored 103 pts over a three game period in Pac-10 play, and simply take you word for it because you had such great logic behind why you think he isn't worth a top 5 pick.
Man if the Knicks wouldn't draft him then no way do I want the Sonics to draft him.
Then you go on to say
S0yb3anB0y wrote:I really don't feel there is any big gamble in this year's draft. All the players drafted in the first round should be solid players. There is going to be at least 10 players ending up being a better player than Bayless.
So does that mean Bayless isn't a gamble? Like you said ALL the players in the first round should be solid.
I'd like to know what 10 are going to be better than Bayless.
Just out of curiousity Soy have you applied to be a scout for the Sonics? I think they could really use a guy with your common sense and knowledge.
-
- Junior
- Posts: 414
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 17, 2007
- S0yb3anB0y
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,841
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 18, 2003
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
Wiff
I just want to point out that if we do want to draft Bayless, please trade down and draft him. Let me get that point clear.
Here is my list:
1. Rose
2. Beasley
3. Mayo
4. Love
5. Brook Lopez
6. DJ Augustin
7. Joe Alexander
8. Danilo Gallinari
and
probably better than Bayless in the long run
9. Brandon Rush
10. Marreese Speights
11. Chase Budinger
12. Robin Lopez
I just want to point out that if we do want to draft Bayless, please trade down and draft him. Let me get that point clear.
Here is my list:
1. Rose
2. Beasley
3. Mayo
4. Love
5. Brook Lopez
6. DJ Augustin
7. Joe Alexander
8. Danilo Gallinari
and
probably better than Bayless in the long run
9. Brandon Rush
10. Marreese Speights
11. Chase Budinger
12. Robin Lopez
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,876
- And1: 578
- Joined: Jun 30, 2001
Heavy P, that's why I think it's going to be both fun and a big surprise this year. I'm looking forward to draft day. In the past there hasn't been much controversy in what the Sonics were looking for even though the player selected may have been different than what we thought.
Radmanovic was a bit of a surprise but Wally Walker wasn't sure if they could retain Rashard Lewis that summer so he went with an insurance pick that could play both forward positions.. Both Collison and Ridnour covered positions that were expected, although I said for over a month before that draft that David West had the intangibles of heart and leadership that in my mind seperated him from other power forwards that year. Swift was more or less expected with them needing a center. Petro was a yawner only because no one had much in the way of expectations that year when Seattle held the #25 pick. Sene was an outragious pick reportedly coming from the urging of Bob Hill. Most of us had Ronnie Brewer pencilled in for that one. Kevin Durant was 100% expected. Green wasn't mind you.
It's all over the map this year with Presti having many different options. More than most years this draft is shaping up to be one of the most interesting in a longtime, evidenced by the way we have talked about a bunch of different names already. I for one aren't really sure who to take, other than if somehow one of Rose, Beasley, or Mayo magically drop to #4 we need to select him.
My best guess is the same as everyone else. Pointguard, center, and a perimiter defender are the three areas that need addressing the most so players that fit those needs seem more likely. But I wouldn't bet a penny on it.
Radmanovic was a bit of a surprise but Wally Walker wasn't sure if they could retain Rashard Lewis that summer so he went with an insurance pick that could play both forward positions.. Both Collison and Ridnour covered positions that were expected, although I said for over a month before that draft that David West had the intangibles of heart and leadership that in my mind seperated him from other power forwards that year. Swift was more or less expected with them needing a center. Petro was a yawner only because no one had much in the way of expectations that year when Seattle held the #25 pick. Sene was an outragious pick reportedly coming from the urging of Bob Hill. Most of us had Ronnie Brewer pencilled in for that one. Kevin Durant was 100% expected. Green wasn't mind you.
It's all over the map this year with Presti having many different options. More than most years this draft is shaping up to be one of the most interesting in a longtime, evidenced by the way we have talked about a bunch of different names already. I for one aren't really sure who to take, other than if somehow one of Rose, Beasley, or Mayo magically drop to #4 we need to select him.
My best guess is the same as everyone else. Pointguard, center, and a perimiter defender are the three areas that need addressing the most so players that fit those needs seem more likely. But I wouldn't bet a penny on it.
Return to Seattle Supersonics Basketball