Image

Memphis - Indy Trade

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

User avatar
Grizzfan777
Senior
Posts: 530
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2006

Memphis - Indy Trade 

Post#1 » by Grizzfan777 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:20 am

Troy Murphy
2008 1st Rounder

For

Mike Miller
2008 Lakers 1st Rounder

Thoughts?
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#2 » by APerna » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:27 am

Wow. I might actually do that.
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
User avatar
Crossova21
Junior
Posts: 379
And1: 11
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

 

Post#3 » by Crossova21 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:28 am

Personally I would love to have Mike Miller, but giving up our 1st rounder for him isn't going to solve our point guard problem. I like the idea of Diogu for Crittenton though. Miller would just further clog up our wing rotation. Love your thinking though. We need another playmaker.
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#4 » by cdash » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:48 am

I actually like this deal. If we could expand it by adding Diogu in and get back Lowry or, less likely, Crittenton, that would be great.
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by APerna » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:51 am

I like the idea cdash, but I'd be interested to see what Grizzfan777 would think of the addition...
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#6 » by cdash » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:53 am

I anticipate he will respond less favorably, lol. Regardless, any deal in which we get rid of Troy Murphy and actually get back a real life player in return is a victory for me.
User avatar
Grizzfan777
Senior
Posts: 530
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2006

 

Post#7 » by Grizzfan777 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:00 am

I think Critt would be easier to get rid off...but you said a PG problem...whats wrong with Tinsley?
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#8 » by APerna » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:05 am

We hope you're joshing. I think I'd take #28/Critt/Miller for #11/Ike/Murph...

We could cross our fingers that Rush falls a few picks, or that Lawson's injury/arrest drop him to #28.
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

 

Post#9 » by PR07 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:09 am

Or Mario Chalmers. J.J. Hickson's stock is rising too, he seems like a steal in the late first round.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#10 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:09 am

Why would the Pacers trade our only chance at getting a legit PG in the draft for another wing player? Have ya'll forgotten about Dunleavy and Granger?
User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

 

Post#11 » by APerna » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:12 am

In my opinion, Miller is more of a true shooting guard than either Dunleavy or Granger.

Simply gives us versatility...and rids us of Murphy's deal.

PR07...I think Chalmers as well, but he might be a tad of a reach there.
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#12 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:17 am

So where does that put Dunleavy? On the bench? Miller has a pretty long deal to, no?
User avatar
Grizzfan777
Senior
Posts: 530
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2006

 

Post#13 » by Grizzfan777 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:19 am

miller has 2 years...Murphy has 3
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#14 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:28 am

So we trade a player, who over-payed, is at least useful to us, and the 11th pick for a play who would be a bench player on the Pacers, or put another very good, long term money, player on the bench, and the 28th pick just to cut a year off of Murphy's deal?

I can't see any, not one, bight side for this.
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#15 » by cdash » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:37 am

Are you serious? No bright side for us? Murphy sucks. Murphy is paid $10 million+ per year for the next three years. Miller is good. He makes $8 million+ per year for the next two years. He, unlike Murphy, has value, so if we wanted to trade him, we could.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,022
And1: 4,333
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

 

Post#16 » by basketballwacko2 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:38 am

I like Miller but I don't want to swap picks what about a deal like Murphy, Daniels and Diogu for Miller, Collins and either Crit or Lowry?
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,711
And1: 13,952
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

 

Post#17 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:36 am

What about a Troy Murphy, Shawne Williams, Ike Diogu, and #11 pick for Mike Miller, Mike Conley Jr., and a future Memphis 2nd round pick (they don't have one this year)?


That's a deal I can get behind. You run a 3 man swing rotation of Dunleavy, Miller, and Granger, with each getting about 32 minutes a night at the swing positions (each of them can play our swing positions equally). Conley immediately becomes the PG of the future and if we can't trade Tinsley, then we essentially platoon Conley with Tinsley, with Diener picking up any extra minutes. We get very thin at PF and C though as we're essentially left with JO and Foster.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#18 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:46 am

cdash wrote:Are you serious? No bright side for us? Murphy sucks. Murphy is paid $10 million+ per year for the next three years. Miller is good. He makes $8 million+ per year for the next two years. He, unlike Murphy, has value, so if we wanted to trade him, we could.


So we throw away the 11th pick, Shawne Williams career, and 1 of our 3 legit big men to add a guy who will be a backup for us?

I don't get it.
ahartleyvu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,352
And1: 60
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#19 » by ahartleyvu » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:47 am

lol why would Memphis do that?

Miller >>>>>> Troy, Ike
Conley >> 11th pick, Shawne
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,711
And1: 13,952
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

 

Post#20 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:21 am

It's a good question, but why the hell would they take on Troy Murphy's contract at all? Answer me that one.

Return to Indiana Pacers