ImageImageImage

does the NBA fix games???

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

ArmstrongInGreen
Pro Prospect
Posts: 956
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Location: right behind you

does the NBA fix games??? 

Post#1 » by ArmstrongInGreen » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:18 pm

I found this halftime understory to be the most fascinating aspect of yesterday's game. Yeah LA won and that sucks, but honestly who really thought they wouldn't. Vegas had them as a 9.5 favorite for christs sake!!! :lol:

Good article in today's Herald about the issue with the officiating. I've been saying for years that David Stern is the 'Don of Basketball' I wouldn't be the least bit suprised if he ordered this series to go 7 games as well. Especially after hearing that CBS would make over half a billion dollars because of it...... :wavefinger:

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/bask ... ormat=text
Truthiracy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,649
And1: 71
Joined: Feb 23, 2008
Location: ABQ, New Mexico

 

Post#2 » by Truthiracy » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:35 pm

Obviously yes.

Here's a video of some terrible calls from Game 3.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=FBWERcV3Fw0
Debate the Conspiracy master on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/truthiracy3
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

 

Post#3 » by MyInsatiableOne » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:40 pm

People have thought this for YEARS. No new news...
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
Allanon
Sophomore
Posts: 135
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

 

Post#4 » by Allanon » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:48 pm

By the same logic, the Celtics were given Game 2. What was it, 38-10?

Piston fans say that the NBA fixed up the Celtics to win and Spur fans say there's a huge conspiracy for Laker/Celtics.

I don't agree, Celtics and Lakers were clearly the 2 best teams in the 2 conferences.

I'd like to think the Lakers didn't show up in Game 2 until the 4th quarter.

I'd also like to think in game 3, only Ray Allen came to play for the Celtics.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

 

Post#5 » by MyInsatiableOne » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:08 pm

^^Seriously? The Laker team in game 3 was MUCH different from the one in game 2. In game 3 they actually WENT TO THE HOOP and hit some shots, unlike game 2.
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
Flexx10dzl
Sophomore
Posts: 125
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

 

Post#6 » by Flexx10dzl » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:08 pm

No they don't Celtics got the calls in game 2 LAL got the calls in game 3..

The NBA wants all games to go 7...lol..think if Bos loses ..it's cuz they just got together and next year ..blah blah..LAkers lose ..Kobe isn't this Kobe isn't That ..but next year with bynum blah blah..ect..
User avatar
bingoboyraps
Junior
Posts: 328
And1: 5
Joined: Aug 10, 2006

 

Post#7 » by bingoboyraps » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:13 pm

...I believe that the officiating is not "ordered" to be biased, although so far in the playoffs the officiating has been advantageous for any home team...I think the refs are intimidated by the home court fans to be honest...and to be fair, because a lot of the calls are based on interpretation and opinon it is a really tough job...
User avatar
Allanon
Sophomore
Posts: 135
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

 

Post#8 » by Allanon » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:16 pm

MyInsatiableOne wrote:^^Seriously? The Laker team in game 3 was MUCH different from the one in game 2. In game 3 they actually WENT TO THE HOOP and hit some shots, unlike game 2.


Exactly right. And in game 3, the Celtics settled for missing jumpshots instead of taking it to the hoop like they did in game 2. PP was unstoppable in the paint in Game 2, but in game 3 he was just throwing up long distance bricks. KG spent most of Game 3 at the 3 point line.

All this conspiracy stuff is overblown, just watch the game.
Desiderium
Veteran
Posts: 2,544
And1: 646
Joined: May 11, 2006
 

 

Post#9 » by Desiderium » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:41 pm

in the press conference, phil jackson was asked about the tim donaghy allegations, and phil replied by saying that the refs should be under a whole other organization that's not involved with the nba front office and is independent. that would be a pretty good idea tho i doubt it would happen
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#10 » by Athanacropolis » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:41 pm

The Cs-Cavs series was blatantly in favor of the LeBrons, especially game 6. That was some disgusting officiating I've seen since 2002. Totally egregious.
GuyClinch
RealGM
Posts: 13,345
And1: 1,478
Joined: Jul 19, 2004

 

Post#11 » by GuyClinch » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:45 pm

They might. Despite Stern's denials its not hard to imagine those events happened. The league controls the refs - if they entered into an agreement the league could just deny it ever happened. Because no money exchanged hands it would be hard to prove.
cloverleaf
RealGM
Posts: 10,241
And1: 7,536
Joined: Feb 10, 2007

 

Post#12 » by cloverleaf » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:46 pm

Of course it is, as everyone has pretty well known for years. But it IS news that it may not be bottled up safely within a one-man scandal after all--and more of the ugly truth is coming out.

Good. Let's get some sunshine in there as Stern disinfectant and get the League on a track of greater integrity at least.
ArmstrongInGreen
Pro Prospect
Posts: 956
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Location: right behind you

 

Post#13 » by ArmstrongInGreen » Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:01 pm

Scandalouzzzz wrote:in the press conference, phil jackson was asked about the tim donaghy allegations, and phil replied by saying that the refs should be under a whole other organization that's not involved with the nba front office and is independent. that would be a pretty good idea tho i doubt it would happen



that would really be the best thing for the NBA, but it will never happen, Don Stern would never relinquish such power...
ArmstrongInGreen
Pro Prospect
Posts: 956
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Location: right behind you

 

Post#14 » by ArmstrongInGreen » Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:02 pm

either way, i think the series is going to 7.......
LongTimeFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,227
And1: 292
Joined: Jul 17, 2003

 

Post#15 » by LongTimeFan » Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:23 pm

I thought the House testicle foul on Billups was pro wrestling type stuff.

That said I have children that ref soccer games and it is tough to get it right. Some calls are just very difficult to make, offsides in soccer and offensive fouls in basketball.

I think if you kick the guy in the balls, you should be ejected in any sport. Even pro wrestling.
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

 

Post#16 » by Athanacropolis » Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:51 pm

LongTimeFan wrote:I thought the House testicle foul on Billups was pro wrestling type stuff.

That said I have children that ref soccer games and it is tough to get it right. Some calls are just very difficult to make, offsides in soccer and offensive fouls in basketball.

I think if you kick the guy in the balls, you should be ejected in any sport. Even pro wrestling.


I agree with your last sentence, but the fact that some calls are difficult to make doesn't absolve the referees from blowing the calls they do. These men are PROFESSIONALS. If they can't hack it, fire 'em and hire refs who can.

Return to Boston Celtics