ImageImageImage

Doc Lets "Phil-the-Whiner" Have It!

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#21 » by sully00 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:41 pm

If that is your best your are about to be rubbed out. I don't want here you BS explanations about effort, that was your night PP hitting nothing, KG bricking, Bennet reffing and Kobe getting off and you still almost spit the bit.

Circle the wagons son, you may have run them Indians off this time but they are still up in them hills.
User avatar
Pogue Mahone
Head Coach
Posts: 6,006
And1: 738
Joined: Aug 09, 2003
Location: In the Sun
Contact:
     

 

Post#22 » by Pogue Mahone » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:31 pm

Game 3 Results (Season Average)

eFG%:
BOS: .398 (.522)
LAL: .478 (.525)

TO%:
BOS: .148 (.170)
LAL: .148 (.149)

OReb%:
BOS: .286 (.266)
LAL: .225 (.263)

FT/FGA
BOS: .181 (.267)
LAL: .304 (.256)

Off Efficiency:
BOS: 92.0 (110.2)
LAL: 98.0 (113.0)

Now, if you look at the defensive performance of each team during the regular season, save for foul shots, Los Angeles performed pretty much like every other team the Celtics have faced. In fact, without the extra trips to the line, the defense was right where it was early in the season for Boston.

For the Lakers, I believe the 'defensive' performance was an aberration. It was so far removed from what they did during the regular season and what they have done, to date, in the playoffs.

Watching the game itself, there was an awful lot of contact that wasn't called that benefited the Lakers. Which is fine but it should be called both ways, imo. Lakers whined about the free throw inequity after game 2. Was it any surprise that KobeStoppedKobeDidn't was going to be catered to by the refs and the league?

That statement may seem hypocritical but the Lakers weren't any more aggressive than the Celtics in game 3. They were much less aggressive in game 2. I think the proof of the league's favoritism is evident in the handling of Phil Jackson's comments. Most players, coaches and executives are fined for disparaging remarks in regards to the officiating. Why nothing towards Jackson?

Oh, btw, Laker fans, I advise you come into the light. It's bad karma to support evil and it will have a way to come back and bite you in the ass :)
User avatar
Danny Darko
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 18,595
And1: 5,954
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
         

 

Post#23 » by Danny Darko » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:17 am

Pogue Mahone wrote:Oh, btw, Laker fans, I advise you come into the light. It's bad karma to support evil and it will have a way to come back and bite you in the ass :)



Hey now, leave Marv Albert out of this
Image
User avatar
Pogue Mahone
Head Coach
Posts: 6,006
And1: 738
Joined: Aug 09, 2003
Location: In the Sun
Contact:
     

 

Post#24 » by Pogue Mahone » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:32 am

Corvus Crow wrote:Hey now, leave Marv Albert out of this


:rofl:
mainevent3405
Banned User
Posts: 307
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 04, 2007

 

Post#25 » by mainevent3405 » Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:06 am

Heir wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


lol, OUR intro sucked? Your team has played that same crap throughout the playoffs with the KG's psycho ass screaming.

Again, I'm talking effort, not their actual performance. How hard you work doesn't always= a win. But if we had played like that in the first two games we'd be the ones up 2-1.


But you're not. Now when you lose tomorrow night, I want to see you back here again. Oh, and YES your intro blows cows balls! THE WORST intro I have seen all season. You would think in La-La land they could have done better. That was atrocious. By the way, I am from the A as well and even everyone down at Atlantic Stations Fox Sports Bar & Grill was laughing at that weak ass introduction.

Return to Boston Celtics