what do the lakers do if ariza opts out? he's due 3.1 next yr if he exercises his player option but what if he decides to walk away? can the lakers afford to commit long term to him knowing that sasha is due a new contract, odom will move down to take some minutes at sf, and walton/vlad's mle level long term deals?
are the lakers going to be trevor's ideal situation knowing that they'll have to slow down the tempo with gasol/bynum? doesn't seem like his offensive skill set would go with the lakers direction unless he dramatically improves his jumpshot.
What if Trevor Ariza opts out?
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
What if Trevor Ariza opts out?
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,966
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
What if Trevor Ariza opts out?
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,966
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
he's only making 3.1 next yr, it shouldn't be that hard to get a competitive salary from someone else. even he takes a pay cut, he may better off on a less traditional offense that will help him show off his skills for a payday next off season. even if he doesn't opt out, whats his future like with the lakers anyway? sasha, walton, radman aren't going anywhere any time soon. odom, or his replacement via trade, is going to be making significant money too. would it be a stretch to say that the only way the lakers can afford to keep ariza is to simply let odom walk?
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,830
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 02, 2007
- Location: OC, CA
All the more reason to move Lamar while he's hot for Teyshawn Prince
. Vlad Rad has gotta to have some takers out there as well, especially on a lesser team he could do great with no restraints or a more uptempo team like GS,PHX, etc.
If Luck Walton wasn't BWalt's son, would he have been signed with an infinity and beyond contract? Would anyone want Walton at his current contract; I would have to say absolutely not.

If Luck Walton wasn't BWalt's son, would he have been signed with an infinity and beyond contract? Would anyone want Walton at his current contract; I would have to say absolutely not.
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 96,341
- And1: 25,469
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
-
probably not as many as you'd thinkDubaLakers wrote:All the more reason to move Lamar while he's hot for Teyshawn Prince. Vlad Rad has gotta to have some takers out there as well, especially on a lesser team he could do great with no restraints or a more uptempo team like GS,PHX, etc.
If Luck Walton wasn't BWalt's son, would he have been signed with an infinity and beyond contract? Would anyone want Walton at his current contract; I would have to say absolutely not.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,827
- And1: 44,855
- Joined: Feb 06, 2007
- Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.
j-far wrote:Yeah playing for Los Angeles gets you a lot of attention around the league and I wouldn't be surprised if Phoenix throw the MLE at either him or Turiaf. Both could be really good in a running offense alongside Nash.
Vujacic has earned himself a nice little raise, but I'll be completely shocked if Turiaf gets anywhere close to the full MLE. His stock has plummeted during the playoffs. We've got virtually no muscle inside, and he still can't make much of a dent in the rotation. Anything more than a million or two would be grossly overpaying.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,827
- And1: 44,855
- Joined: Feb 06, 2007
- Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.
And speaking of Ariza, he's be absolutely insane to opt out of his contract. What exactly has he done to raise his profile and earn a raise? Frankly, I'm still trying to figure out why exactly so many Laker fans are enamored with him.
If and when his contract does come up, barring some sort of breakout next year I don't see any way the Lakers can commit anything but a minimum deal. We already have too much dead money locked up in Walton and Radmanoscrewup, and at the same position no less.
If and when his contract does come up, barring some sort of breakout next year I don't see any way the Lakers can commit anything but a minimum deal. We already have too much dead money locked up in Walton and Radmanoscrewup, and at the same position no less.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,227
- And1: 68
- Joined: Feb 18, 2004
-
Sedale Threatt wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Vujacic has earned himself a nice little raise, but I'll be completely shocked if Turiaf gets anywhere close to the full MLE. His stock has plummeted during the playoffs. We've got virtually no muscle inside, and he still can't make much of a dent in the rotation. Anything more than a million or two would be grossly overpaying.
the market is absolutely dead this year... if Varajeo or Darko can bring in at least the MLE, Turiaf will get close to it IMO... that's why I feel we just let him go... we could easily replace him with a Kurt Thomas type...
Vujacic is also going to get the full MLE like Kapono/Radmanovic, but he's worth it IMO...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,827
- And1: 44,855
- Joined: Feb 06, 2007
- Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 96,341
- And1: 25,469
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
-
xSABOx wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
the market is absolutely dead this year... if Varajeo or Darko can bring in at least the MLE, Turiaf will get close to it IMO... that's why I feel we just let him go... we could easily replace him with a Kurt Thomas type...
Vujacic is also going to get the full MLE like Kapono/Radmanovic, but he's worth it IMO...
so who are these kurt thomas like replacements, they don't fall off of trees