Newest RIEHLDEAL Big Board as of 6/11/08

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

riehldeal
Banned User
Posts: 1,315
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 16, 2002

Newest RIEHLDEAL Big Board as of 6/11/08 

Post#1 » by riehldeal » Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:30 pm

1. Rose
2. Beasley
3. Mayo
4. Arthur
5. Alexander
6. Randolph
7. Gordon
8. Bayless
9. Love
10. Lopez
11. McGee
12. Batum
13. Gallinari
14. Budinger
15. Westbrook
16. Thompson
17. Lee
18. Koufos
19. Rush
20. Greene
21. Jordan
22. Speights
23. Douglas-Roberts
24. Augustin
25. Lopez
26. Lawson
27. Hibbert
28. Asik
29. Walker
30. Ajinca
GSW2K4
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,797
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 27, 2002

 

Post#2 » by GSW2K4 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:06 pm

Arthur and Buddinger seem high...

What do you see in them?
jebdrbhjb
Pro Prospect
Posts: 907
And1: 40
Joined: Feb 16, 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
     

 

Post#3 » by jebdrbhjb » Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:44 pm

not to mention it seems like Alexander's stock has jumped a good 10 spots.
Excuse me please, one more drink
Could you make it strong?
'Cause I don't need to think


......Dave Matthews
User avatar
jfucsd10
Junior
Posts: 436
And1: 0
Joined: May 14, 2006

 

Post#4 » by jfucsd10 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:52 pm

and I dont think Westbrook is the 15th best player in this draft. Seems a bit low.
Interesting, you have some ideas you would like to bounce off Brian Sabean? That's strange, I have some objects I would like to bounce off Brian Sabean.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,271
And1: 25,730
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#5 » by moocow007 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:53 pm

The only justification I can see for Arthur and Alexander to be suddenly so high is because of how they looked in recent workouts. But if that was the argument then there's no reason for Westbrook (who looked better than anyone else in workouts) would be so low. Nor are workouts what usually drive players draft positions (especially in recent history where the workout fiends have rarely flourished).

DeAndre Jordan, no matter how raw and how high a potential bust factor he is, will not last until 21...not a chance.

Lee and Rush are also extremely high. Lee is a combo guard that really does nothing extremely well. Rush has a huge hitch is his shooting motion that will get exploited once he goes up against guys that are likely just as tall as him and athletic as him.

Augustin at 24? Way, way, way too low. We can argue height all we want but Augustin is the 2nd best PG in this draft and has both the quickness and the game to make up for being a strong 5'11". And he's a lot more athletic and fleet of foot than the usual cast of characters that he apparently is associated with (i.e. Mateen Cleaves, Jameer Nelson, etc).
riehldeal
Banned User
Posts: 1,315
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 16, 2002

 

Post#6 » by riehldeal » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:20 am

moocow007 wrote:The only justification I can see for Arthur and Alexander to be suddenly so high is because of how they looked in recent workouts. But if that was the argument then there's no reason for Westbrook (who looked better than anyone else in workouts) would be so low. Nor are workouts what usually drive players draft positions (especially in recent history where the workout fiends have rarely flourished).

DeAndre Jordan, no matter how raw and how high a potential bust factor he is, will not last until 21...not a chance.

Lee and Rush are also extremely high. Lee is a combo guard that really does nothing extremely well. Rush has a huge hitch is his shooting motion that will get exploited once he goes up against guys that are likely just as tall as him and athletic as him.

Augustin at 24? Way, way, way too low. We can argue height all we want but Augustin is the 2nd best PG in this draft and has both the quickness and the game to make up for being a strong 5'11". And he's a lot more athletic and fleet of foot than the usual cast of characters that he apparently is associated with (i.e. Mateen Cleaves, Jameer Nelson, etc).


I have had Arthur and Alexander that high since the last month of the college season......I have based all of my opinions, sans McGee whom I had much higher until I witnessed his performance in Orlando myself, on actual game viewings

the only thing i will say is that Augustin might be slightly low but yeah, status quo for now
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,597
And1: 2,304
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

 

Post#7 » by Village Idiot » Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:01 am

I recall you being high on Claver. What's your take on him now?
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
riehldeal
Banned User
Posts: 1,315
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 16, 2002

 

Post#8 » by riehldeal » Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:33 pm

Village Idiot wrote:I recall you being high on Claver. What's your take on him now?


Still am but just don't think that he ultimately remains in this draft

but as a portland fan, I hope he does and we snag him at 13

and as for his placement on this list, I would say either 9 or 10
JN
RealGM
Posts: 20,746
And1: 11,035
Joined: Feb 02, 2007
   

 

Post#9 » by JN » Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:31 pm

I like the list, because you will have the people who base there mock on two web sites and change things around slightly, berate you. They will give you basketball reasons, but really it is all based on where those sites have them ranked.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,271
And1: 25,730
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#10 » by moocow007 » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:38 am

JN wrote:I like the list, because you will have the people who base there mock on two web sites and change things around slightly, berate you. They will give you basketball reasons, but really it is all based on where those sites have them ranked.


?? So basically they won't give you basketball reasons is what you're saying? And the reasons might actually be due to having seen these guys play. Yeah, hard to believe that some people actually watch players and not base it off of DX and nbadraft.net aye? And if the point is about being different then, Beasley will go 21 to the Nets (as Rod Thorn wets himself on national TV). How's that for different?
User avatar
Se7en WoRds
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,453
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2006
Location: The thought you had don't even contemplate, Infinite like figure eight there's no escape...

 

Post#11 » by Se7en WoRds » Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:38 am

Thompson would be a terrible pick for the sixers at 16 if Jordan and Speights were both on the board.
Image
"Yo I'd rather have respect than money, no doubt
But listen to me y'all, I want the mass amount
That the Sesame Street Dracula cant Count"
riehldeal
Banned User
Posts: 1,315
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 16, 2002

 

Post#12 » by riehldeal » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:10 am

Se7en WoRds wrote:Thompson would be a terrible pick for the sixers at 16 if Jordan and Speights were both on the board.


the avg poster never ceases to amaze me.....not a mock bro, it's a big board

Return to NBA Draft