ImageImageImage

Min / Den Simple but effective

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#1 » by prefuse73 » Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:29 pm

Buckner, #31 or Boston '09 for Steven Hunter and #20.

For Denver, they shave off one year off of Hunter's salary (who only played 6 mpg last season. Buckner gives them a veteran defensive wing who can hit the three and is much more stable than j.r. smith.

For Minnesota, we get (if healthy) a legit 7 footer who is athletic, relatively young, can block some shots and rebound. We also get in a good position to draft one of Rlopez, Aijinca, McGee, Hibbert, Kosta, or maybe Speights.

Hunter - RLopez (or whoever)
Jefferson - Gomes - Richard
Brewer - Gomes - Jaric
Mayo - McCants - Jaric
Foye - Mayo - Jaric
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#2 » by Basti » Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:47 pm

I'd do it.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#3 » by 4ho5ive » Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:39 pm

Between Camby, Nene, and Martin, I can see why Denver would have no use for Hunter. Is Buckner's exprining enough to cover the cost of moving down from the #20 to the #31? Im not sure. I do it, not sure Denver does.
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#4 » by cpfsf » Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:57 pm

Denver would not do that, they are trading for a worse pick and Buckner's longer contract.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#5 » by deeney0 » Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:59 pm

cpfsf wrote:Denver would not do that, they are trading for a worse pick and Buckner's longer contract.


Buckner is nonguaranteed after next season (well, he has about $1mil guaranteed, but for all intents and purposes he is an expiring).

Denver is up against the lux, they might not be able to afford to pay their first round pick, they might prefer to move back to next year's Boston's pick or to take a guy in the 2nd Round that they can stash in Europe for a year or two.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,279
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#6 » by shrink » Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:31 pm

Yes for us, and if DEN doesn't make some other move, maybe a yes for them.

The Nuggets had Buckner before -- hope that doesn't affect their decision.

Good idea, prefuse73.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#7 » by big3_8_19_21 » Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:31 pm

shrink wrote:Yes for us, and if DEN doesn't make some other move, maybe a yes for them.

The Nuggets had Buckner before -- hope that doesn't affect their decision.

Good idea, prefuse73.


maybe...they like him?
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,886
And1: 862
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#8 » by karch34 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:28 am

I like it a lot. With Denver up against the luxury tax this deal could make a lot of sense for them.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,739
And1: 2,566
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#9 » by younggunsmn » Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:48 am

Steven Hunter has a player option for '09 at 3.9 million.
Buckner is guaranteed 1 mil for '09.
They only (potentially) save 2.9 million in '09.

Their salary in '09 depends on if they re-sign Iverson, and for how much. If they let him walk they'll be comfortably under the lux.
I completely agree that maybe they'd like to get out of the 1st round to save that money this year,
but they may need more incentive than that.

They'd probably do it for the Miami pick alone, but I don't know if I'd be willing to do that, it could very easily fall in the 11-15 range next year.

But if we've got a C we really, really like available at 20 (mcgee/koufos/hibbert) that we value as a starting NBA center, we've got to do it because this draft is so deep that next year there will likely not be a player of similiar quality available in the 11-15 range. Plus I really like being able to keep 31 and 34 this year, I think the draft is 35 deep at least and we should get 2 outstanding players there.
Hopefully Ajinca and Hardin.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,739
And1: 2,566
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#10 » by younggunsmn » Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:54 am

They have 2 awful, unmovable deals in Nene (4-43) and K-Mart (3-46.5) that will eat up nearly half their cap by 2010.

Thank goodness we're not in that position.
Jaric looks like a bargain next to those 2 slugs.
MN Die Hard
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Min / Den Simple but effective 

Post#11 » by MN Die Hard » Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:36 pm

I threw something similar to this out on the trade board a while back and it didnt get an awful lot of support from the Denver side (although not a lot of replies either). I doubt they'd be willing to add their draft pick to a deal like this.

http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=783349

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves