ImageImageImage

Keep Telfair for Cheap?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,279
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#1 » by shrink » Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:37 am

I read an interesting article that suggests that a small offer might keep Telfair simply becaue of the new economics of free agency. I would not mind keeping Telfair, regardless of who we draft, if his price tag isn't too high.

http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=9062

"Owners' pockets are getting a lot tighter," asserted the executive.

"Do you know how many full mid-level exceptions were handed out last year? Zip. That's right, not a single one. And the summer before last? Just three."

So while teams are granted various exceptions to the salary cap -- with the mid-level being the most prominent -- owners are feeling less and less comfortable about allowing their GM's to spend the entire amount allotted by the collective bargaining agreement. And owners are getting increasingly more cautious of paying for potential in the current economic climate.

What that means is restricted free agents this summer -- such as J.R. Smith, Sasha Vujacic and Sebastian Telfair to name a few -- probably aren't going to command the kind of money they might have been able to even four or five years ago.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,279
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#2 » by shrink » Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:39 am

.. and of course, this might mean Gomes is cheaper, and Craig Smith and Kirk Snyder aren't guaranteed to hit the road.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#3 » by deeney0 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:57 am

I'm for keeping all of them if they're cheap.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#4 » by Basti » Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:14 am

deeney0 wrote:I'm for keeping all of them if they're cheap.
Frozen316
Pro Prospect
Posts: 806
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 07, 2006
Location: Here
Contact:

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#5 » by Frozen316 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:20 am

I would love to keep Sebastian, especially if we don't take Mayo or Bayless. We should have at least one true point guard on the team.
User avatar
Tekkenlaw
Starter
Posts: 2,078
And1: 39
Joined: Apr 16, 2008

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#6 » by Tekkenlaw » Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:23 am

I really want to keep Bassy, I think he has more potential than any of our other RFA's.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#7 » by revprodeji » Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:47 pm

WHat I was told is that Gomes is our first priority, but Bassy is #2. We want to keep him. I see us keeping him. Likely Mayo is seen as a 1/2, which means having a true back-up 1 is a good thing. Also, we are constantly getting injuried. I am all for keeping Bassy.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#8 » by dunkonu21 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Telfair is our version of Rondo. We have to keep him!
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,997
And1: 6,012
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#9 » by Devilzsidewalk » Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:13 pm

for very very cheap I'd like him, but not if it interferes with MN getting a more important free agent at swing or the frontcourt. For backup PG we already got Jaric, if we need another we can go the minimum route and pick up a guy like Arroyo or Smush Parker. Plus we got those two 2nd rounders, that could be a guard too. We have to wait until the draft sorts itself out before thinking about Telfair.
Image
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#10 » by deeney0 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:19 pm

Bassy isn't nearly the defender that Rondo is, but I think Bassy is a bit more of a pure PG.
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#11 » by dunkonu21 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:39 pm

But he is a pain in the ass to the other team like Rondo. He'll get a couple blow byes, steal a bunch of balls and is a pretty good passer. I know he isn't as athletic, but he brings some of the same energy and is a very good back-up PG if injuries happened just like Rev said.


He is also one of the few dudes in the world who has the foot speed and quickness to stay with the Tony Parker's and Chris Paul's of the world.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#12 » by revprodeji » Mon Jun 16, 2008 6:11 pm

another thing is that you could argue McCants was at his best last year when he played the 3, not the 2. We had a line-up of Bassy-Jaric-Shad. Lets say we get Mayo. We can play a line up of foye-mayo-shad (bassy-mayo-shad) which means more minutes for Bassy. It is a crazy athletic line-up.

Talent is good, the more the better.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#13 » by deeney0 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 6:25 pm

If you're willing to play zone all the time or just give up on defense. But playing Shad a lot at three, against folks like Carmelo and LeBron and Caron? Recipe for trouble.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,315
And1: 12,163
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#14 » by Worm Guts » Mon Jun 16, 2008 6:34 pm

You can give Shad spot duty at the 3 during certain matchups but you can't give him consistent minutes there, especially with an undersized 2.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#15 » by 4ho5ive » Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:49 pm

I was rooting for Telfair when we got him last season so it would be nice to be able to retain him if he is willing to come for a lower dollar amount. If he can work on his shooting and ability to finish, then I think he would be a great change-of-pace guard to have.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,886
And1: 862
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#16 » by karch34 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:53 pm

I'm all for keeping him on the cheap. Even if we get Mayo who could play PG, it'd be nice to have a pure PG as the backup. Marko can play PG, but I think he's a better fit as a combo 1-3 off the bench, mainly at SF.

I like what I saw from Bassy and want to keep him. The issue as I see it is going to be how much PT for everyone since we're already back court heavy without drafting Mayo. So if we draft Mayo and resign Gomes and Telfair that alone leaves us with:
Mayo: starting PG or SG
Foye: starting PG or SG
McCants: SG likely off the bench and not a great SF due to size.
Telfair: backup PG
Jaric: backup PG, SG, SF
Gomes: SF, PF who in my mind should be starting at SF with Al at PF.
Brewer: SF, SG still needs work, but he's going to get his PT some way.
Buckner: SG but expiring not likely to see major minutes

Obviously with Al playing C it moves Gomes to PF for major minutes and helps alleviate some of the 1-3 minutes, but I think both are much more effective at PF and SF respectively.
User avatar
TMo519
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,274
And1: 25
Joined: Jun 10, 2008
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#17 » by TMo519 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:27 pm

Yeah, I kinda echo everyone else, I'm all on board with signing talent on the cheap, I don't care what position.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,279
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#18 » by shrink » Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:49 pm

Well, I thought it was good news too, and I didn't expect anyone to say it was a bad thing to keep talent at a bargain price.

One other thought I had here was that this gives us a slight edge economically for all the guys we want to bring back, if its cheap.

First, all teams operate under similar cost limitations, and if our players are more productive for the dollar, i.e., more cost-effective, that is obviously a benefit.

Second, if other teams are reluctant to add salary for a free agent, that doesn't mean they wouldn't trade for the guy if it would keep their payroll at the same level. For example, suppose we could get Craig Smith for $2 mil. He might not be a fit here, but he'd be a helpful low-post scorer for several teams that have a big center to put behind them. Heck, he'd be more veteran production at a cheap price than several picks for teams with play-off ambitions. Yes, we'd be adding that salary (versus letting him walk like a TPE), but we could possibly trade him for a piece that fits? Or use him as incentive to get a trade done? If he's cheap, he's a trade asset.

I'll be happy to keep Telfair. I hope this means Gomes pricetag will be lesser than I imagine. But if the price is right, getting Craig Smith (talent without fit) would be a good move too.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,886
And1: 862
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Keep Telfair for Cheap? 

Post#19 » by karch34 » Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:53 am

That should make Smith more likely and you make some great points Shrink. I really think it depends on if we acquire a big man through the draft or via trade though.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves