Heat11114 wrote:
I don't understand the fascination with Miller. If we dump him in 2010 for cap space we just traded down from 2 to 5 for a 2 year rental of Mike Miller. If we resign him, we just traded down from 2 to 5 for Mike Miller and our potential cap space. I'd rather trade our cap garbage and get back expiring contracts or future picks.
The thing about Miller is he is such a great shooter, which is exactly what we need next to Wade. If Riley ends up deciding that he likes Mayo as much or more than Beasley, then by making that trade he gets the guy he always wanted while picking up a great shooting swingman and possibly another young piece (Warrick/Lowry/Critt/late 1st), all while dumping our worst contract in Blount. This could make us competitive immediately if we decide to use the MLE on the best C we can get, or if we move Marion or Haslem for a C. If we use the MLE then we could have:
Mayo/Banks
Wade/Miller
Marion/Miller/Wright
Haslem/Marion/Warrick
MLE/Zo
If we didn't use the MLE, we would have the ability to trade Marion's expiring or Haslem for a post-presence at C depending on who came available at the deadline. Or, we choose not to use the MLE and keep Marion, then once Marion expires we wil have the financial flexibility to sign a PF/C to the max and have a lineup of: Mayo, Wade, Miller, Haslem, MAX player. Or, we could still go for cap space in 2010, while becoming more competitve now.
Still though, I would be happier if we came out of this draft with Beasley than with Mayo/Miller but if Riley really wants Mayo then he would have to heavily consider this. It would give us flexibility long term (trades and/or cap room in '09 and '10) while making us competitive now, which would also make me happy.