psykosacul I can request anything of anyone that I want in this world. They don't have to comply nor do I have to ALREADY exhibit, perform, or posses that which I requested. That person didn't comply so I exercised my right to make an addition to my ever growing ignore list.
As for Lou Williams and the Bogut/Dalembert tandem, did you see what Mo Williams 17.2ppg 6.3assists and Sessions 8.1ppg 7.7assists did for the Bucks last season? I'm not going to waste time explaining the virtues of having a player that is 6th in the NBA in interior scoring. Case closed.
Is Dalembert A Suitable PF Option?
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan
Re: Is Dalembert A Suitable PF Option?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,285
- And1: 1
- Joined: Dec 13, 2007
Re: Is Dalembert A Suitable PF Option?
- IggyTheBEaST
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,452
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Re: Is Dalembert A Suitable PF Option?
phiphan wrote:Defensively, maybe. Offensively, no. Look at the playoffs this year -- it's almost prerequisite to have an offensively gifted PF if you want to advance past the 1st round.
offense is irrelvent if the C we bring in has scoring skills. They will put their best post defender on him and the worse one on daly. They will defend us anyway they want and we can run our ofesne any way we want regardless of 4 or 5. sams position label doesnt really matter one bit.
===========
ITBs Dream Team:
Iverson/Iggy/Lebron/Amare/Dwight
I <3 Thaddeous
ITBs Dream Team:
Iverson/Iggy/Lebron/Amare/Dwight
I <3 Thaddeous
Re: Is Dalembert A Suitable PF Option?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,383
- And1: 599
- Joined: Jun 24, 2004
Re: Is Dalembert A Suitable PF Option?
Agree...the scoring PF is not a pre-requisite. The Sixers had a better shot at getting out of the 1st round if they had more interior depth on defense, not offense. Don't get me wrong, Garnett, Duncan (young), Boozer are all great pieces to teams, but it is by no means a pre-requisite to get our of round 1.